Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.32, CiteScore: 0.906

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Legume Research, volume 38 issue 2 (april 2015) : 219-228

Impact of biodynamic preparations and panchgavya in organically managed cropping systems comprising legumes on soil biological health

Monika Rana, K.P. Raverkar*, N. Pareek, R. Chandra, D.K. Singh
1College of Agriculture, G.B. Pant University of Agriculture & Technology, Pantnagar-263 145, India.
Cite article:- Rana Monika, Raverkar* K.P., Pareek N., Chandra R., Singh D.K. (2025). Impact of biodynamic preparations and panchgavya in organically managed cropping systems comprising legumes on soil biological health. Legume Research. 38(2): 219-228. doi: 10.5958/0976-0571.2015.00081.8.

ABSTRACT

Biological health of soil was assessed to understand the effect of varingly managed organic cropping systems under field conditions. Twelve treatment combinations comprised two cropping systems (CS1-Basmati rice-Chickpea-Sesbania green manure ;CS2-Basmati rice-Vegetable pea-Maize (green cob & Fodder) + Green gram (residues incorporation) and six organic nutrient manangement practices- T1: Farmyard manure + Vermicompost + Enriched Compost + Neem Cake, T2: Biodynamic Preparations, T3: Farmyard manure + Vermicompost + Enriched Compost + Neem Cake + Panchgavya, T4: Farmyard manure + Vermicompost + Enriched Compost + Neem Cake + Biodynamic Preparations, T5: Farmyard manure + Vermicompost + Enriched Compost + Neem Cake + Biodynamic Preparations + Panchgavya, T6: Control. The highest activity of different soil enzymes viz., dehydrogenase, acid, alkaline and total phosphatase; and aryl sulfatase was assessed to the tune of 1311.02 µg Tri Phenyl Formazan 24h-1g-1 soil at flowering in ‘spring’, 26.99 µg p-nitrophenol h-1g-1 soil, 35.19 µg p-nitrophenol h-1g-1 soil, 62.18 µg p-nitrophenol h-1g-1 soil and 77.75 µg p-nitrophenol h-1 g-1 soil at harvest of ‘rabi’ crop, respectively receiving the organic nutrient package through T5. Significantly enhanced microbial population and their biomass facilitating the enhanced mineralization of nitrogen to the tune of 150.10 µg NH4+-N g-1 soil with nutrient management practices employed through T5 was observed.

REFERENCES

  1. Bolton, H. Jr.; Elliott, L.F. and Papendick, R.I. (1985). Soil microbial biomass and selected soil enzyme activities : effect of fertilization and cropping practices. Soil Biol. Biochem., 17: 297-302.
  2. Brzezinska, M.; Stepniewska, Z. and Stepniewska, W. (1998). Soil oxygen status and dehydrogenase activity. Soil Biol. Biochem., 30: 1783-1790.
  3. Carpenter-Boggs, L.; Kennedy, A.C., and Reganold, J.P. (2000). Organic and Biodynamic. Effects on soil biology. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. J. 64: 1651-1659.
  4. Casida, L.E. Jr.; Klein, D.A. and Santoro, T. (1964). Soil dehydrogenase activity. Soil Sci., 98: 371-376.
  5. Chandrakala, M. (2008). Effect of FYM and fermented liquid manure on yield and quality of chilli (Capsicum annuum L.). M.Sc. (Agricul. Chem.). University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad.
  6. Degens, B.P. (1997). Macro-aggregation on soil by biological bonding and binding mechanisms and the factor affecting these: a review. Australian J. Soil Res. 35: 431-459.
  7. Dinesh, R. ; Dubey, R. P.; Ganeshamurthy, A. N. and Shyam Prasad, G. (2000). Organic manuring in rice-based cropping system: Effects on soil microbial biomass and selected enzyme activities. Current Sci. 79: 1716-1719.
  8. Dinesh, R.; Dubey, R. P. and Shyam Prasad, G. (1998). Soil microbial biomass and enzyme activities as influenced by organic manure incorporation into soils of a rice-rice system. J. Agron. and Crop Sci. 181: 173-178.
  9. Goldstein, W.; Barber W., Carpenter-Boggs, L.; Dalsoren, D. and Koopmans, C. (1999). Comparisons of Conventional, Organic, and Biodynamic Methods. Michael Fields Agricultural Institute. W2493 County Road ES, East Troy, WI 53121.
  10. Goyal, S.; Mishra, M.M.; Hooda, I.S. and Singh, R. (1992). Organic matter microbial biomass relationships in field experiments under tropical conditions: Effects of inorganic fertilization and organic amendments. Soil Biol. Biochem., 24: 1081-1084.
  11. Hasebe, A.; Kanazava, S. and Takai, Y. (1985). Microbial biomass in paddy soil II. Microbial biomass C measured by Jenkinson’s fumigation method. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 31: 349-359.
  12. Jagtap, P.B.; Patil, J.D.; Nimbalkar, C.A. and Kadlag, A.D. (2007). Influence of integrated nutrient management on soil properties and release of nutrients in a saline-sodic soil. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci., 55(2): 147-156.
  13. Jenkinson, D.S. (1988). Determination of microbial biomass and nitrogen in soil. In: Advances in Nitrogen Cycling in Agricultural Ecosystems (Wilsom, J.R. ed). Willingford, Oxon., U.K:CAB International, pp. 368-386.
  14. Katyal, V.; Gangwar, K.S. and Gangwar, B. (2003). Long-term effect of fertilizer use on yield sustainability and soil fertility in rice-wheat system in subtropical India. Fert. News, 48(7): 43-46.
  15. Koepf, H.H. (1989). The Biodynamic Farm: Agriculture in the Service of the Earth and Humanity. Anthroposophic Press, Hudson, New York. pp. 248.
  16. Kumar, A. and Yadav, D.S. ( 2003). Long-term nutrient management for sustainability in rice-wheat cropping system. Fert. News, 48(8): 27-34.
  17. Lal, R. and Kimble, J.M. (1997). Conservation tillage for carbon sequestration. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst. 49: 243-253.
  18. Nannipieri, P. Muccini, L. and Ciardi, C. (1983). Microbial biomass and enzyme activities: production and persistence. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 15:6: 679-685.
  19. Nannipieri, P.; Greg, S. and Ceccanti, B. (1990). Ecological significance of the biological activity in soil. In: Soil Biochemistry Vol. 6 (J.M. Bollag and G. Stotzky, Eds.), Marcel Dekker, New York, pp. 293-355.
  20. Paul, E.A. and Voroney, R.P. (1984). Field interpretation of microbial biomass activity measurements. In: Current Perspectives in Microbial Ecology (M.L. Klug and C.A. Reddy, eds). American Society for Microbiology, Washington Pp. 509-    514.
  21. Rao, M.B.; Gunapalan, N. and Reddy, B.K. 2007. In: Dynamics of soil microbial biomass and activity in conventional and organic farming systems N. Soil Biol. Biochem. (In Press).
  22. Shwetha, B.N. (2007). Effect of nutrient management through organics in soybean wheat cropping system. M.Sc. (Agri.) Thesis, Univ. Agric. Sci., Dharwad.
  23. Stanford, G. and Smith, S.J. (1972). Nitrogen mineralization potentials of soils. Soil Sci. Soc. America Proc., 36: 465-472.
  24. Tabatabai, M.A. and Bremner, J.M. (1969). Use of p-nitrophenyl phosphate for assay of soil phosphatase activity. Soil Biol. Biochem., 1: 301-307.
  25. Tabatabai, M.A. and Bremner, J.M. (1970). Arylsulphatase activity in soils. Soil Sci .Soc. Am.Proc., 34: 225-229.
  26. Tu, C.; Ristaino, J.B. and Hu, S. (2006). Soil microbial biomass and activity in organic tomato farming systems: Effects of organic inputs and straw mulching. Soil Bio. Biochem. 38:247-255.
  27. Wollum, A.G. (1982). Cultural methods for soil microrganisms. In: Methods of soil Analysis , Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties (Page , A.K.; Millar , R.H. and Keeney, D.R. eds.). Agronomy Monograph No. 9, ASA-    SSSA Publisher, Madison, Wisconsin, USA. pp. 781-814.
  28. Yadav, A. K. and Mowade, S. M. (2004). Organic manures and compost. In: Organic farming -A ray of hope for Indian farmer.
Reviewed By

Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)