Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.391

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Legume Research, volume 37 issue 6 (december 2014) : 682-684

DIVERSITY ANALYSIS OF CHICKPEA GERMPLASM IN SCARCE RAINFALL ZONE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, iNDIA

V. Jayalakshmi*, G. Rufus Ronald, K. Lakshmanna
1All India Coordinated Research Project on Chickpea, Regional Agricultural Research Station, Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University, Nandyal – 518 502, India.
Cite article:- Jayalakshmi* V., Ronald Rufus G., Lakshmanna K. (2024). DIVERSITY ANALYSIS OF CHICKPEA GERMPLASM IN SCARCE RAINFALL ZONE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, iNDIA. Legume Research. 37(6): 682-684. doi: 10.5958/0976-0571.2014.00697.3.
Studies on genetic divergence carried out at Regional Agricultural Research Station, Nandyal, of Scarce Rainfall zone of Andhra Pradesh classified 113 chickpea genotypes into eight clusters. Cluster I was the largest with 69 genotypes followed by cluster III with 21 genotypes. Maximum inter cluster distance was observed between VII and cluster VIII (22.00) followed by clusters VI and VII (20.02) whereas, days to 50 % flowering (41.25 %) followed by 100 seed weight (23.28 %), plant height (17.29 %) and number of pods (7.32 %) contributed maximum towards diversity. Based on inter cluster distances and Per se  performance ICCV 13124, ICC 4918, ICC 4872 and ICCV 2969, ICCV 6306, ICCV 15697, ICCV 15333, ICCV 7272, ICCV 15518, ICCV 7308 and ICCV 4814 were identified for inclusion in hybridization programme for realizing desirable transgressive segregants.
  1. Bhatt, G.M. (1970). Multivariate analysis approach to selection of parents for hybridization aiming at yield improvement in self pollinated crops. Aus. Res, 21: 1-7.
  2. Dwevedi, K. Gaibriyal, K and Lal, M. 2009. Assessment of genetic diversity of cultivated chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L.). Asian J. of Agri. Sci. 1(1):7-8.
  3. Jayalakshmi, V and Rufus Ronald, G. (2011). Assessment of genetic diversity for quantitative traits in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). J. Res. ANGRAU. 39(3):58-61.
  4. Lal, D., Ram Krishna and Gurupreet, S. (2001). Genetic divergence in chickpea. Indian J. of Pulse Res. 14(1):63-63.
  5. Lokare, Y.A., Patil, J.V. and Chavan, U.D. (2007). Genetic analysis of yield and quality traits in kabuli chickpea. J. Food Legumes. 2: 147–149.
  6. Mahalanobis, P.C. (1936). On the generalized distance in Statistics. . Proc. of Nat. Inst. of Sci. India. 2:49-55.
  7. Murthy, B.R and Arunachalam,V. (1961). The nature of divergence in relation to breeding systems in crop plants. Indian J. of Gen. 26: 188-189.
  8. Shailendra Patel, Anita Babbar and Rao, S.K. (2006). Genetic divergence in Kabuli chickpea Indian J. of Pul. Res. 19:107-108.
  9. Rao, C.R. (1952) Advanced Statistical Methods in Biometrical Research. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York.

Editorial Board

View all (0)