Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.391

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2023)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Legume Research, volume 36 issue 6 (december 2013) : 505-510

PERFORMANCE OF SOME BLACKGRAM GENOTYPES IN RELATION TO PHYSIO-CHEMICAL, ROOT PARAMETERS AND YIELD AS INFLUENCE BY FOLIAR FEEDING WITH BORON

Lolesh Pegu, Prakash Kalita, Kaushik Das, S. Alam, H. P. Dekabarua*, Priti Bandana Konwar
1College of Agriculture, Assam Agricultural University, Jorhat-785013, India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Pegu Lolesh, Kalita Prakash, Das Kaushik, Alam S., Dekabarua* P. H., Konwar Bandana Priti (2024). PERFORMANCE OF SOME BLACKGRAM GENOTYPES IN RELATION TO PHYSIO-CHEMICAL, ROOT PARAMETERS AND YIELD AS INFLUENCE BY FOLIAR FEEDING WITH BORON. Legume Research. 36(6): 505-510. doi: .

ABSTRACT

A field study was carried out during summer season (2011) with the objective to assess the physio-chemical and root parameters of seven blackgram genotypes under rainfed situation as influence by foliar feeding with boron. There were three treatment combinations comprising of control (T1), foliar application of 100 ppm boron at 20 DAS (T2) and foliar application of 100 ppm boron at 20 and 35 DAS (T3). Significant variations in root parameters, physiological and biochemical parameters were recorded in all the genotypes. Genotype USJD-113 followed by SB-121-36 was recorded to be the best genotypes in terms of physiological parameters like photosynthetic rate, chlorophyll contents, leaf nitrogen content and root characters. Foliar application of boron caused significant alteration in root parameters, physiological and biochemical parameters of all the genotypes. The treatment T3 was found to be more effective in enhancing all the parameters as compared to T2. Genotypes USJD-113 and SB-121-36 were found to be more responsive towards foliar application of boron.

REFERENCES

  1. Anonymous (2007-2008). Economic Survey of Assam. Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Beltola, Guwahati.
  2. Bolanos, A.; Huyghe, C.; Escalle, C.; Hacquet, J. and Julier, B. (2002). Effect of Cultivar and Environment on Seed Yield in Alfalfa. Crop Sci. 42: 45-50.
  3. Bolaños, L.; Brewin, N.J. and Bonilla, I. (1996). Effects of Boron on Rhizobium-legume Cell-surface Interactions and Nodule Development. Plant Physiol. 110: 1249-1256.
  4. Brown, P.H.N.; Bellaloui, M.A.; Wimmer, E.S.; Bassil, J.R.; Hu, H.; Pfeffer, H.; Dannel, F. and Romheld, V. (2002). Boron in plant biology. Plant Biol. 4: 205-223.
  5. Chakraborty, S.; Borah, H.K.; Borah, B.K.; Pathak, D.; Baruah, B.K.; Kalita, H. and Borman, B. (2012). Genetic parameters and combining ability effects of parents for seed yield and other quantitative traits in black gram [Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper]. Not. Sci. Biol. 2: 121-126.
  6. Das, M.R.; Borah, D.K. and Medhi, B.K. (2000). Bronzing of rice in relation to ionic environment in inceptisols of Assam. Crop Res. 20(2): 186-191.
  7. Dell, B. and Huang, L. (1997). Physiological response of plants to low boron. Plant Soil 193: 103-120.
  8. Dell, B.; Huang, L. and Bell, R.W. (2002). Boron in plant reproduction. In : Boron in Plant and Animal Nutrition. [Goldbach, H.E. et al. (ed.)]. Kluwer Academic, Pledum Publ, New York, pp. 103-117.
  9. Dordas, C. (2005). Foliar boron application improves seed set, seed yield, and seed quality of alfalfa. Agron. J. 98(4): 907-913.
  10. Gupta, S.C. and V.K. Kapoor (2009). Fundamentals of Applied Statistics. Sultan Chand and Sons 23, Daryaanj, New Delhi-110002.
  11. Harmankaya, M.; Onder, M.; Hamurcu, M.; Geyha and Gezgin, S. (2008). Response of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cultivars to foliar and soil applied boron in boron deficient calcareous soil. African J. Biotechnol. 7(18): 3275-3282.
  12. Heitholt, J.J. (1994). Supplemental boron, boll retention percentage, ovary carbohydrates, and lint yield in modern cotton genotypes. Agron. J. 86: 492-497.
  13. Hiscox, J.D. and Israelstan, G.F. (1979). A method for the extraction of chlorophyll from leaf tissue without maceration. Can. J.Bot. 57:1332-1334
  14. Jackson, M.L. (1973). Soil Chemical Analysis. Public Prentice Hall of India Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi.
  15. Mandal, C.; Bondapandhyay, P.; Alipatra, A. and Banerjee, H. (2012). Performance of summer mung bean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek) under different irrigation regimes and boron levels. J. Food Legume. 25: 37-40.
  16. Marchner, H. (1995). Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants. Academic Press, Newyork, pp. 1-889.
  17. Medhi, B.K.; Deka, C.R.; Das, C.; Chakravarty, D.N.; Talukdar, A. and Hazarika, S. (2002). an Appraisal of nature of soil acidity, chemical and electro-chemical characterization of some Ultisols and Alfisol of Kamrup District, Assam. Res. on Crop. 3(1): 54-60.
  18. Rajiv, G. and Prakash, M. (2012). Response of black gram to flyash application. Plant Archives 12(1): 253-256.
  19. Rao, H.G. and Vidyasagar, C. (1981a). Effect of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium along with foliar and soil applied born on sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). I. Growth, yield, seed oil content and varietal performance. Andra Agric. J. 28: 150-155.
  20. Sharaf, A.E.M.; Farghal, I.I. and Sofy, M.R. (2009). Response of broad bean and lupin plants to foliar treatment with boron and zinc. Autralian J. Basic and Appl. Sci. 3(3): 2226-2231.
  21. Sinclair,T.R.; Bennett,J.M. and Boote , K.J. (1993). Leaf nitrogen content, photosynthesis and radiation use efficiency in peanut. Peanut Sci. 20(1): 40-43
  22. Talukdar, M.C.; Basumatary, A. and Dutta, S.K (2009). Status of DTP Extract of micronutrients in soils on the rice and sugarcane ecosystem of Golaghat District in Assam. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci. 57: 313-316.
Reviewed By

Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)