Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.391

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2023)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Legume Research, volume 38 issue 2 (april 2015) : 157-163

Genetic variability, heritability, genetic advance and path analysis in mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek]

Aparna Raturi, S.K. Singh*, Vinay Sharma, Rakesh Pathak
1Central Arid Zone Research Institute, Jodhpur-342 003, India.
Cite article:- Raturi Aparna, Singh* S.K., Sharma Vinay, Pathak Rakesh (2024). Genetic variability, heritability, genetic advance and path analysis in mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek]. Legume Research. 38(2): 157-163. doi: 10.5958/0976-0571.2015.00024.7.

ABSTRACT

To utilize mungbean gene pool effectively, studies on genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance were conducted under rain-fed conditions during kharif 2009, 2010 and 2011. The data of ten quantitative characters was recorded. The number of pods per plant and seed yield were recorded with significantly higher heritability (>60%), corresponding PCV (>25%) and GCV (>20%) coupled with more than 30% genetic advance. The correlation studies exhibited highly significant and positive association of all the quantitative characters with seed yield except with that of days to 50% flowering. The number of pods per plant had the maximum direct effect followed by plant height and 1000-seed weight indicating their direct contribution towards seed yield. The present study suggests that seed yield and number of pods per plant are greatly influenced by the additive gene effect and greater proposition of variations are heritable for these traits.

REFERENCES

  1. Abbas, G., Asghar, M.J., Shah, T.M. and Atta, B.M. (2010). Genetic diversity in mungbean (V. radiata (L.) Wilczek] germplasm. Pak. J. Bot. 42:3485-3495.
  2. Abbas, G., Manzoor, B., Mahmood, T., Siddique, M. and Ahsanul Haq, M. (2008). Stability analysis for seed yield in mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.)Wilczek]. J. Agri. Res. 46:223-228.
  3. Adewale, B.D., Okonji, C., Oyekanmi, A.A., Akintobi, D.A.C. and Aremu, C.O. (2010). Genotypic variability and stability of some grain yield components of Cowpea. African J. Agri. Res. 5:874-880.
  4. Agarwal, A.P., Patil, S.A. and Satimath, P.M. (2001). Variability, heritability and genetic advance of some quantitative characters over the season in soybean. Madras J. Agri. 88:1-3.
  5. Arshad, M., Aslam, M. and Irshad, M. (2009). Genetic variability and character association among morphological traits of mungbean, Vigna radiata L. Wilczek genotypes. J. Agri. Res. 47:121-126.
  6. Biradar, K. (2007). Genetic studies in green gram and association analysis. Karnataka J. Agri. Sci. 20:843-844.
  7. Chattopadhyay, N., Ghosh, T., Sinha, S., Chattopadhyay, K., Karmakar, P. and Ray, B. (2010). Polysaccharides from Turbinaria conoides: Structural features and antioxidant capacity. Food Chem. 118:823-829.
  8. Dash, D. and Pattanayak, S. K. (2007). Effect of seed treatment with cobalt on nodulation, growth and yield of green gram crop through improving biological nitrogen fixation. J. Soils Crops. 17:24-29.
  9. De Candolle, A. (1886). Origin of Cultivated Plants. Hafner Publishing, New York.
  10. Dewey, D.R. and Lu, K.H. (1959). A correlation and path coefficient analysis of components of crested wheat grass seed production. Agron. J. 51:515-518.
  11. El Hafiez, A., Zohry, A. and El, Aal AINA. (2003). Soil morphological features and competition of intercropping mung bean with sugarcane in upper Egypt. Egyptian J. Agri. Res.. 81:1-14.
  12. Gupta, S., Kumar, S. and Singh, B.B. (2004). Relative genetic contributions of ancestral lines to Indian mungbean cultivars based on coefficient of parentage analysis. Indian J. Genet. 64:299-302.
  13. Hakim, L. (2008). Variability and correlation of agronomic characters of mungbean germplasm and their utilization for variety improvement programme. Indonesian J. Agri. Sci. 9:24-28.
  14. Hamdi, A., El-Ghareib, A.A., Shafey, S.A. and Ibrahim, M.A.M. (2003). Direct and indirect relationships among lentil characters. J. Agri. Res.. 81:224-229.
  15. Johnson, H.F., Robinson, H.F. and Comstock, R.E. (1955). Estimates of genetic and environmental variability in soybean. Agron. J. 47:314-318.
  16. Joshi, M., Singh, S. and Singh, I. (2005). Variability and association studies in lentil (Lens culinaris Medik). Indian J. Pulses Res. 18:144-146.
  17. Khan, M.Q., Awan, S.I. and Mughal, M.M. (2005). Estimation of genetic parameters in spring wheat genotypes under rainfed conditions. Indus J. Biol. Sci. 2:367–370.
  18. Lambrides, C.J. and Godwin, I. (2007). Mungbean. In: Genome Mapping and Molecular Breeding in Plants, Volume 3: Pulses, sugar and tuber crops (Kole, C. eds), Springer, Berlin and Heidelberg, pp. 69–90.
  19. Luthra, S.K. and Sharma, P.C. (1990). Correlation and path analysis in lentils. Lens Newsletter. 17:5-8.
  20. Madhur, J. and Jinks, C. (1994). Study of different days of sowing on yield parameters of green gram (V. mungo). Agri. News. 12:53-56.
  21. Makeen, K., Abrahim, G., Jan, A. and Singh, A.K. (2007). Genetic variability and correlations studies on yield and its components in mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek). J. Agron. 6:216-218.
  22. Mondal, M.M.A., Hakim, M.A., Juraimi, A.S., Azad, M.A.K. and Karim, M.R. (2011). Contribution of morpho-    physiological attributes in determining the yield of mungbean. African J. Biotechnol. 10:12897-12904.
  23. Ortiz, R. and Nq, N.Q. (2000). Genotype x Environment interaction and its analysis in germplasm characterization and evaluation. In: Genotype x Environment interaction analysis of IITA mandate crops in sub–Saharan Africa. (Ekanayake, I.J., Ortiz, R. eds). IITA, Ibadan. pp 32-40.
  24. Pathak, R., Singh, M. and Henry, A. (2011). Genetic diversity and interrelationship among clusterbean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba) genotypes for qualitative traits. Indian J Agri. Sci. 81:402-406.
  25. Rahim M.A., Mia, A.A., Mahmud, F., Zeba N. and Afrin, K.S. (2010). Genetic variability, character association and genetic divergence in mungbean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek). Plant Omics J. 3:1-6.
  26. Rani, C.I., Veeraragavathatham, D. and Sanjutha, S. (2008). Studies on correlation and path coefficient analysis on yield attributes in root knot nematode resistant F1 hybrids of tomato. J. App. Sci. Res. 4:287-295.
  27. Rao, G.R., Rao, Y.K. and Rao, C.M. (2006). Genetic divergence in mungbean. Indian J. Pulses Res. 19:61-63.
  28. Sarobol, N. (1997). Mungbean: Past, present and future. In: Proceedings of the National Mungbean Research Conference VII held at Golden Grand Hotel, Thailand, 2-4 December 1997, pp: 1-20.
  29. Siddique, M., Malik, M.F.A. and Awan, S.I. (2006). Genetic divergence, association and performance evaluation of different genotypes of mungbean (Vigna radiata). Internatl J. Agri. Biol. 8:793-795.
  30. Singh, D.P. and Ahlawat, I.P.S. (2005). Greengram (Vigna radiata) and blackgram (Vigna mungo) improvement in India past, present and future prospects. Indian J. Agri. Sci. 75:243–250.
  31. Singh, M., Singh, T.P., Sharma, S.K. and Thakur, H.L. (2010). Influence of cropping system on combining ability and gene action for grain yield and its components in black gram (Vigna mungo). Indian J. Agri. Sci. 73:356-357.
  32. Solanki, Y.S. (2006). Comparision of correlations and path coefficients under environments in lentil (Lens culinaris Medik). Crop Improv. 33:70-73.
  33. Souframanien, J. and Gopalakrishnan, T. (2004) A comparative analysis of genetic diversity in black gram genotypes using RAPD and ISSR markers. Theoretical Appl. Genet. 109:1687-1693.
  34. Srinives, P. (2006). Research direction and legume crop development. In: Proceedings of the National Legume Crop Research Conference I, held at Rimkok Resort Hotel, Chiang Rai, Thailand, August 2006, pp: 389.
  35. Tabasum, A., Saleem, M. and Aziz, I. (2010). Genetic variability, trait association and path analysis of yield and yield components in mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek). Pak. J. Bot. 42:3915-3924.
  36. Tantasawat, P., Trongchuen, J., Prajongjai, T., Thongpae, T., Petkhum, C., Seehalak, W. and Machikowa T. (2010). Variety identification and genetic relationships of mungbean and black gram in Thailand based on morphological characters and ISSR analysis. African J. Biotechnol. 9:4452-4464.
  37. Tyagi, S.D. and Khan, M.H. (2011). Correlation, path-coefficient and genetic diversity in lentil (Lens culinaris Medik) under rainfed conditions. Internatl Res. J. Plant Sci. 2:191-200.
  38. Wani, M.R. and Khan, S. (2006). Estimates of genetic variability in mutated populations and the scope of selection for yield attributes in Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek. Egyptian J. Biol. 8:1-6.
  39. Yadav, S.S., Phogat, D.S., Solanki, I.S. and Malik, B.P.S. (2005). Genetic divergence under two environments in lentil. Indian J. Pulses Res. 18:150-152.
  40. Yimram, T., Somta, P. and Srinives, P. (2009). Genetic variation in cultivated mungbean germplasm and its implication in breeding for high yield. Field Crops Res. 112:260-266.
Reviewed By

Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)