Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.391

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Legume Research, volume 37 issue 5 (october 2014) : 473-478

EVALUATION OF GENETIC DIVERGENCE AND HERITABILITY IN URDBEAN [VIGNA MUNGO (L.) HEPPER]

Sanjeev Kumar, Prakash Singh, Rajesh Kumar, Ranjeet Singh*
1Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, N. D. University of Agriculture and Technology, Kumarganj, Faizabad – 224 229 India
Cite article:- Kumar Sanjeev, Singh Prakash, Kumar Rajesh, Singh* Ranjeet (2024). EVALUATION OF GENETIC DIVERGENCE AND HERITABILITY IN URDBEAN [VIGNA MUNGO (L.) HEPPER]. Legume Research. 37(5): 473-478. doi: 10.5958/0976-0571.2014.00662.6.

ABSTRACT

A field experiment was conducted to examine the genetic divergence and heritability among 109 urdbean genotypes. Significant genotypic differences were observed for all the quantitative traits studied, indicating the considerable amount of variation among the genotypes for twelve characters. High heritability (bs) estimates (> 80%) coupled with high genetic advance (%) of mean were seen for most of the yield contributing traits showing additive gene effect. The genetic diversity analysis was done by employing non-hierarchical Euclidean cluster analysis. It revealed wide range of D2 values (57.57 to 7358.48) suggesting the presence of marked amount of genetic diversity among genotypes; which were grouped into eleven clusters. Cluster IV (18) and XI (18) were having the maximum genotypes followed by cluster I (15) and cluster V (12). The maximum and minimum inter cluster distance were recorded between II and IX (7358.48), and X and XI (170.83), respectively representing wide divergence among these clusters. It is suggested that the crosses should be made between genotype of cluster IV, VIII, IX and XI for enhancing the yield potential of crop as well as improving important economic traits to develop a high yielding variety or cultivar in future breeding programme.

REFERENCES

  1. Beale, E.M.L. (1969). Euclidean cluster analysis. A paper contributed to 37th session of the International Statistical Institute.
  2. Burton, G.W. (1952). Quantitative inheritance in grasses. Proc. 6th int. Grassland Congress 1: 227-283.
  3. Burton, G.W. and de Vane, E.H. (1953). Estimating heritability in tall Fescu (Festuca arudinacea) from replication clonal material. Agron. J., 45: 478-481.
  4. Chauhan, M.P., Mishra, A.C. and Singh, A.K. (2008). Genetic divergence studies in uerbean (Vigna mungo L.). Legume Res., 31 (1): 63-67.
  5. Elangaimannan, R.; Anbuselvam, Y. and Karthikeyan, P. (2008). Genetic diversity in blackgram [Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper]. Legume Res.., 31 (1): 57-59.
  6. Ghafoor, A., Sharif, A., Ahmad, Z., Zahid, M.A. and Rabbani, M.A. (2001). Genetic diversity in blackgram (Vigna mungo). Field Crops Res., 69 (2):183-190.
  7. Johnson, H.W., Robinson, H.F. and Comstock, R.E. (1955). Genotypic and phenotypic correlations in soybean and their implications in selection. Agron. J., 47: 474-483.
  8. Katiyar, P.K. and Dixit, G.P. (2010). Genetic divergence in Indian blackgram cultivars. Indian. J. Agric. Sci., 80 (3): 242-243.
  9. Rao, C.R. (1952). Advanced Statistical Methods in Biometric Research. John Wiley and Sons Inc. New York. pp. 390.
  10. Shanthi, P., Jebaraj, S. and Manivannan, N. (2006). Genetic diversity in urdbean [Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper]. Legume Res., 29 (3): 181-185.
  11. Spark, D.N. (1973). Euclidean cluster analysis: Algorithm As-58 Applied Statistics, 22: 126-136.
  12. Yadav, G.C., Singh, P.K., Singh, B.B. and Verma, R. (2001). Genetic variability and path coefficients in urdbean. Indian J. Pulses Res., 14 (2): 143-144.
Reviewed By

Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)