Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.391

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Research Article

Legume Research, volume 40 issue 2 (april 2017) : 379-383

Screening of some chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) varieties against Helicoverpa armigera under semi arid climatic conditions

Shafiq Ur Rehman, Muhammad Waqar Hassan, Moazzam Jamil, Muhammad Akram*
1<p>University College of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences,&nbsp;The Islamia University of Bahawalpur- 63100 Pakistan.</p>
Cite article:- Rehman Ur Shafiq, Hassan Waqar Muhammad, Jamil Moazzam, Akram* Muhammad (2017). Screening of some chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) varieties against Helicoverpa armigera under semi arid climatic conditions . Legume Research. 40(2): 379-383. doi: 10.18805/lr.v0i0.7589.

ABSTRACT

Nine desi chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) varieties viz., Balkasar-2000, Bhakhar-2011, Bittal-98, Brc-61, Brc-390, Punjab-2000, Punjab-2008, Thall-2006 and 03009 were sown at experimental area of Islamia University of Bahawalpur in randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications each during 2014-2015. 03009 had highest mean larval population of Helicoverpa armigera followed by Bittal-98, Thall-2006 and Bhakhar-2011. Punjab-2000, BRC-390 and BRC 61 exhibited moderate larval population. The least larval population was observed in Punjab-2008 and Balkasar-2000. Maximum per cent pod damage was observed in Bittal-98 (28.29) followed by 03009 (26.57), Bhakhar-2011 (25.47), Thall-2006 (24.27), Punjab-2000 (22.81), BRC-390 (21.70), BRC-61 (20.53), Balkasar-2000 (18.30) and Punjab-2008 (16.73). Highest yield of crop was observed in Punjab-2008 (516.35gplot-1) followed by Balkasar-2000 (483.38), BRC-61 (415.15), BRC-390 (380.03), Punjab-2000 (345.34), Bittal-98 (303.50), Bhakhar-2011 (298.43), Thall-2006 (293.55) and 03009 (209.99) g/plot. It was also observed that larval population of H. armigera increased or decreased with weather factors. Thus varieties showing more pest population yielded less and those with less pest population generated more yield of chickpea. These results can be employed for integrated pest management of H. armigera on chickpea in different semi arid climatic conditions.

REFERENCES


  1. Ahmad, K. and Awan, M.S. (2013). Integerated management of insect pests of chickpea Cicer arietinum (L.) Walp in South Asian Countries: Present status and future strategies - a review. Pak. J. Zool. 45: 1125- 1145.

  2. Akhtar, L.H., Pervez, M.A. and Nasim, M. (2011). Genetic divergence and inter relationship studies in chickpea Cicer arietinum L. Pak. J. Agri. Sci. 48: 35-39.

  3. Akhtar, M.F., Ahmed, I., Nadeem, I., Abbas, Q., Raza, A., Yousaf, M.J., Ahmed, R. and Niaz, T. (2014). Impact of different dates of sowing on gram pod borer (Helicoverpa armigera) infestation in chickpea crop. World J. Zool. 9: 270-275.

  4. FAO. (2014). FAOSTAT data 2014. http://www.fao.org

  5. GoP. (2014). Pakistan. Economic Survey 2013-14. Economic Adviser’s Wing, Finance Division, Government of Pakistan, Islamabad

  6. Javed, H., Iqbal, J. and Khan, T. M. (2013). Studies on population dynamics of insect pests of safflower, Carthamus tinctorius L. Pak. J. Zool. 45: 213-217.

  7. Jukanti, A.K., Gaur, P.M., Gowda, C.L.L. and Chibbar, R.N. (2012). Nutritional quality and health benefits of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.): A review. Br. J. Nutr. 108: 11-26.

  8. Karim, S. (2000). Management of Helicoverpa armigera: A review and prospects for Pakistan. Pak. J. Biol. Sci. 3: 1213-1222.

  9. Khan, S.M. and Faizullah, S. (1999). Varietal performance of gram and comparative effectiveness of three insecticides against gram pod borer (Helicoverpa armigera Hb.). Pak. J. Biol. Sci. 2: 1435-1437.

  10. Kranthi, K.R., Jadhav, D.R., Kranthi, S., Wanjari, R.R., Ali, S.S. and Russell, D.A. (2002). Insecticides resistance in five major insect pests of cotton in India. Crop Prot. 21: 449-460.

  11. Mandal, S. M. A., (2003). Screening of some chickpea genotypes against Helicoverpa armigera. Environ. Ecol. 21: 240-241.

  12. Nadeem, S., Shafique, M., Hameed, M., Atta, B.M. and Shah, T.M. (2010). Evaluation of advanced chickpea genotypes for resistance to pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) (Lepidoptera; Noctuidae). Pak. J. Agri. Sci. 47: 132-135.

  13. Narayanamma, V.L., Gowda, C.L.L., Sariamulu, M., Ghaffar, M.A. and Sharma, H.C. (2013). Nature of gene action and maternal effects for pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera resistance and grain yield in chickpea, Cicer arietinum. Am. J. Plant Sci. 4: 26-37. 

  14. Patankar, A. G., A. P. Giri, A. M. Harsulkar, M. N. Sainari, V. V.Deshpade, P. K, Ranjekar and V. S. Gupta. (2001). Complexity in specificities and expression of Helicoverpa armigera gut proteinases explains polyphagous nature of insect pest. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 31: 453-464.

  15. Prabhakar, M.S., Yeshbir, V.S., Singh, S.P. and Singh, Y. (1998). Economic injury levels of Helicoverpa armigera (Hb) in chickpea as influenced by irrigation. Indian J. Entomol. 60: 109-115.

  16. Rajput, A. A., M. Sarwar, N. Ahmad, Q. H. Siddiqui and M. Toufiq. (2003). Evaluation for resistance in some local and exotic chickpea genotypes against Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner). Pak. J. Biol. Sci. 6: 1612-1615.

  17. Rashid, A., Saeed, H.A., Akhtar, L.H., Siddiqi, S.Z. and Arshad, M. (2003). Performance of advance chickpea strains against gram pod borer (Helicoverpa armigera Hubner). Asian J. Plant Sci. 2: 418-419.

  18. Ruttoh E.K., Mulwa, R.M.S., Ngode, L., Gohole, L., Towett, B., Njogu, N., Silim, S., Rao, G.V.R. and Kimurto, P.K. (2013). Screening for host plant resistance to Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in selected chickpea (Cicer arientinum L.) genotypes in Kenya. Egerton J. Sci. Technol. 13: 39-55. 

  19. Sarwar, M. (2013). Exploration on resource of resistance in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes against gram pod borer Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) (Lepidoptera).    Afr. J. Agric. Res. 8: 3431-3435.

  20. Sarwar, M., Ahmad, N. and Tofique, M. (2009). Host plant resistance relationship in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) against gram pod borer (Helicoverpa armigera Hubner). Pak. J. Bot. 41: 3047-3052.

  21. Sarwar, M., Ahmad, N. and Tofique, M. (2011). Identification of susceptible and tolerant gram (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes against gram pod borer (Helicoverpa armigera) (Hubner). Pak. J. Bot. 43: 1265-1270.

  22. Shafique, M., Nadeem, S., Hamed, M., Atta, B. M. and Shah, T. M. (2009). Performance of some advance desi chickpea genotypes against pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) resistance. Pak. J. Zool. 41: 277-280.

  23. Shah, Z. A. and Shahzad, M. K. (2005). Fluctuation patterns of different developmental stages of Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on chickpea (Cicer arietinum) and their relationship with the environment. Entomol. Fennica. 16: 201–206.

  24. Shrestha, R., Neupane, R.K. and Adhikari, N.P. (2011). Status and future prospects of pulses in Nepal. Paper presented at regional workshop on pulse production held at Nepal Agriculture Research Council (NARC), Kathmandu., Nepal, from 24-25 October 2011.http://www.doanepal.gov.np/downloadfile/Current%20Status%20SAARC_paper-    Nepal_1320838291.

  25. Steel, R.G.D., Torrie, J.H. and Dickey, D.A. (1997). Principles and procedures of statistics. A biometrical approach. 3rd edn. McGraw Hill Inc., New York. 

  26. Wakil, W., Ashfaq, M. and Ahmad, S. (2005). Larval population and pod infestation by Helicoverpa armigera (HUB.) on chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) in Rawalpindi, Pakistan. Pak. Entomol. 27: 33-36.

  27. Zaman, K., Shah, I.A., Khan, M.M. and Ahmad, M. (2012). Macroeconomic factors determining FDI impact on Pakistan’s growth. S. Asian J. G. Bus. Res. 1: 79-95. 
Reviewed By

Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)