Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.391

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Legume Research, volume 37 issue 6 (december 2014) : 614-620

EFFECT OF INTEGRATED NUTRITION, BIOFERTILIZERS AND ZINC Application ON PRODUCTION POTENTIAL AND PROFITABILITY OF GARDEN PEA (Pisum sativum L.) IN EASTERN HIMALAYA, INDIA

Rakesh Kumar*, B.C. Deka, Narendra Kumawat1, S.V. Ngachan2
1ICAR Research Complex for NEH Region, Nagaland Centre, Jhamapani, Medziphema- 797 106, India
Cite article:- Kumar* Rakesh, Deka B.C., Kumawat1 Narendra, Ngachan2 S.V. (2024). EFFECT OF INTEGRATED NUTRITION, BIOFERTILIZERS AND ZINC Application ON PRODUCTION POTENTIAL AND PROFITABILITY OF GARDEN PEA (Pisum sativum L.) IN EASTERN HIMALAYA, INDIA. Legume Research. 37(6): 614-620. doi: 10.5958/0976-0571.2014.00685.7.

ABSTRACT

A field experiment was conducted during 2010-11 and 2011-12 to evaluate the effect of inorganic, organic and biofertlizers on growth, yield and economics of garden pea. Application of 100% RDF (NPKS i.e. 40:20:20:20) along with 50% RDN (20 kg nitrogen through vermicompost) to garden pea result in higher growth attributes such as plant height (52.05 and 53.85 cm), number of branches plant-1 (5.94 and 6.25), dry matter production plant-1 (31.92 and 33.45 g), root dry weight (1.83 and 2.13 g plant-1), number of nodules plant-1 (20.51 and 21.80) and nodules dry weight (66.63 and 67.88 mg) in the year of 2010 and 2011, respectively. The yield attributes viz, number of pods plant-1 (15.43 and 16.58), number of seeds pod-1 (5.84 and 6.09), 100-grain weight (20.30 and 20.76 g); and grain yield (11.94 and 12.88 g   plant-1) and straw yield (21.50 and 22.30 g plant-1) were significantly higher recorded with the application of 100% RDF along with 50% RDN during both the years, respectively. The grain (11.53 and 12.62 q ha-1), straw (21.86 and 23.32 q ha-1) and biological yield (30.95 and 35.93 q ha-1) were recorded with above treatment in respective years. Gross return, net return, B:C ratio, production efficiency (kg day-1 ha-1) and economic efficiency (Rs. ha-1 day-1) were also noted higher with 100% RDF +50% RDN during both the years. The seed inoculation with biofertilizers + zinc @ 5 kg ha-1 gave the significantly higher growth and yield attributes; seed yield (10.73 and 11.97 q ha-1), straw yield (19.65 and 21.15 q ha-1) and biological yield (30.56 and 33.13 q ha-1) in both the years, respectively. In both the years, gross return (Rs. 36131 and 40151), net return (Rs. 24495 and 28515), B: C ratio (2.07 and 2.42), production efficiency (9.67 and 10.99 kg day-1 ha-1) and economic efficiency (Rs. 221 and 262 day-1 ha-1) were obtained with the combined applied of biofertilizers + zinc @ 5 kg ha-1 during both the years, respectively

REFERENCES

  1. Anonymous (2009). Project Co-ordinator’s Report, All India Co-ordinated Research Project on MULLaRP. pp: 16.
  2. Bansal, R.K. (2009).Synergistic effect of Rhizobium, PSB and PGPR on nodulation and seed yield of mungbean. J. Food Leg., 22: 37-39.
  3. Gomez, K.A. and Gomez, A.A. (1984). Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research (2nd Ed.). John Wiley & Sons, New York. pp 20-30.
  4. Hedge, D.M. and Dwivedi, B.S. (1993). Integrated nutrient supply and management as a strategy to meet nutrient demand. Fertilizers News, 38: 49-59.
  5. Kanda, C.M. and Mohapatra, B.K. (2003). Effects of farmyard manure and inorganic fertilizers on yield and nutrient uptake of seed amaranth (Amaranthus hypochondricus L.). Indian J. Agron., 48: 142-144.
  6. Kumar, R.P., Singh, O.N., Singh, Y., Dwidedi, S, and Singh, J.P. (2009). Effect of integrated nutrient management on growth, yield, nutrient uptake and economics of french bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). Indian J. Agric. Sci., 79 (2): 122–8.
  7. Kumari, A., Singh, O.N. and Kumar, R. (2012). Effect of integrated nutrient management on growth, seed yield and economics of garden pea (Pisum sativum L.) and soil fertility changes. J. Food Legumes, 25 (2): 121-124.
  8. Kumawat, N., Singh, R.P., Kumar, R., Kumari, A. and Kumar, P. 2012. Response of intercropping and integrated nutrition on production potential and profitability on rainfed pigeonpea. J. Agril. Sci., 4 (7) : 154-162.
  9. Kushwaha, B.L. (1994). Response of French bean to nitrogen application in north Indian plains. Indian J. Agron., 39: 34-37.
  10. Singh, B. and Pareek R.G. (2003). Effect of phosphorus and biofertilizers on growth and yield of mungbean. Indian J. Pulses Res., 16: 31-33.
  11. Singh, R. and Rai, R. K. (2004). Yield attributes, yield and quality of soybean (Glycine max) as influenced by integrated nutrient management. Indian J. Agron., 49 (4): 271-274.
  12. Sinha, B.K., Hemantranjan, A. and Chhabra, M.L. (2001). Yield and yield component of pea (Pisum sativum L.) as affected by zinc nutrition. Annals of Bio., 17: 157-158.
  13. Srivastava, T.K. and Ahlawat, I.P.S. (1995). Response of pea (Pisum sativum L.) to phosphorus, molybdenum and biofertilizers. Indian J. Agron., 40: 630-635.
Reviewed By

Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)