Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.391

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Legume Research, volume 36 issue 5 (october 2013) : 387-391

ISOLATION OF HIGH YIELDING LINES ASSOCIATED WITH FUSARIUM WILT RESISTANCE IN PIGEONPEA (CAJANUS CAJAN)

Nalini Dharwad*, P. M. Salimath1, P S Dharmaraj2
1Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, UAS, Dharwad- 580 005, India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Dharwad* Nalini, Salimath1 M. P., Dharmaraj2 S P (2024). ISOLATION OF HIGH YIELDING LINES ASSOCIATED WITH FUSARIUM WILT RESISTANCE IN PIGEONPEA (CAJANUS CAJAN). Legume Research. 36(5): 387-391. doi: .

ABSTRACT

High yielding pigeonpea lines which are associated with Fusarium wilt resistance were isolated from the experiments conducted at UAS, Dharwad and ARS, Gulbarga during 2009 - 2012. The efforts could able to isolate transgressive wilt resistant plants in F2 and high yielding resistant recombinant inbred lines (RILs) from population derived from ‘Maruti’ X ‘GS-1.’ Lines/plants were selected based on seed yield and yield related traits such as 100 seed weight and no .of pods per plant. Phenotyping 288 F2 plants for yield related traits and screening F2:3 for fusarium wilt reaction could able to isolate 10 transgressive wilt resistant plants in F2 which range in seed yield from 169.15 to 217.78 g/plant and 100 seed weight from 9.14 to 13.57g. Accordingly, two high yielding wilt resistant RILs, 109 and 243 were isolated with seed yield of 15.33 and 13.65 q/ha, respectively.

REFERENCES

  1. Chauhan, Y.S. (1990). Pigeonpea: Optimum agronomic management. In The pigeonpea. Nene Y.L., Hall S.D. and Sheila V.K. (eds).CAB International, Wallingford, Oxon, UK. p. 257-278.
  2. Mahata, D. N. and Dave, B.B. (1931). Studies in Cajanus indicus. Botany, 19:1-25.
  3. Ramanujam, S. and Singh, S. P. (1981). Pigeonpea breeding in the All India Coordinated Program. Pages 403-414 In: Genetic Improvement of Pigeonpea – A Review (Saxena KB, ed.). Proceedings of the International Workshop on Pigeonpeas. ICRISAT, Patancheru, India. 1:15-19
  4. Reddy, M. V., Sharma, S. B. and Nene, Y. L. (1990). Pigeonpea: Disease management. In The pigeonpea. p. 303-7. Y.L. Nene, S.D. Hall, and V.K. Sheila (eds). CAB International, Wallingford, Oxon, UK.
  5. Reddy, M. V., Nene, Y. L., Raju T. N., Kannaiyan, J., Remanandan, P., Mengesha, M. H. and Amin, K. S. (1995). Registration of pigeonpea germplasm line ICP 9145 resistant to fusarium wilt. Crop Sci. 35:1231.
  6. Shaw, F. J. F. (1933). Studies in Indian Pulses: The type of Cajanus indicus Spreng. Indian J. Agric Sci. 3:1-36.
  7. Silim, S. N., Gwata, E. T., Mligo J. K., Siyambi, M., Karuru, O., King, S. B. and Omanga, P. (2005). Registration of pigeonpea culitvar ‘ICEAP 00040’. Crop Sci. 45:2647.
  8. Singh, N. B., Singh, I. P. and Singh, B. B. (2005). Pigeonpea Breeding. in Advances In Pigeonpea Research. Kanpur, India: Indian Institute of Pulses Res. Pages 67-95
Reviewed By

Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)