Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.391

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Legume Research, volume 37 issue 3 (june 2014) : 287-293

STANDARDIZATION OF SOWING DATE AND CULTIVARS FOR SEED PRODUCTION OF GARDEN PEA (PISUM SATIVUM VAR. HORTENSE L.) UNDER NORTH WESTERN HIMALAYAS

Akhilesh Sharma*, Munish Sharma, K.C. Sharma, Yudhvir Singh, R.P. Sharma, G.D. Sharma
1Department of Vegetable Science and Floriculture, CSK Himachal Pradesh Agricultural University, Palampur-176 062, India
Cite article:- Sharma* Akhilesh, Sharma Munish, Sharma K.C., Singh Yudhvir, Sharma R.P., Sharma G.D. (2024). STANDARDIZATION OF SOWING DATE AND CULTIVARS FOR SEED PRODUCTION OF GARDEN PEA (PISUM SATIVUM VAR. HORTENSE L.) UNDER NORTH WESTERN HIMALAYAS. Legume Research. 37(3): 287-293. doi: 10.5958/j.0976-0571.37.3.043.

ABSTRACT

An experiment was conducted during 2007-2008 and 2008-2009 to study the seed production of garden pea cultivars at variable sowing dates. The study was conducted in split plot design replicated thrice with sowing dates starting from 31st October in main plots and four varieties namely, ‘Azad
P-1’, ‘Palam Priya’, ‘Arkel’ and ‘Pb-89’ in sub-plots. Different dates of sowing and varieties significantly influenced phenology and seed yield along with yield contributing traits. The early sowing on 31st October significantly increased the seed yield by 13% and 41% over 10th November and 21st November, respectively. Among the varieties, ‘Palam Priya’ out performed ‘Azad P-1’ and ‘Arkel’ for seed yield with an increase of 38 and 113 % while ‘Pb-89’ had an edge of 34 and 107% over these varieties. Interaction effects revealed that sowing beyond 31st October did not result in decline in seed yield in some cultivars. The highest seed yield was recorded in ‘Palam Priya’ on 31st October and 10th November and that of ‘Pb-89’on 31st October sowing dates over ‘Azad P-1’ and ‘Arkel’. Hence, sowing on end October in ‘Pb-89’ and that of ‘Palam Priya’ from end October to first quarter of November were the most ideal combinations to obtain higher seed yield in garden pea under sub-humid temperate environment.

REFERENCES

  1. Amanullah, J.I., Hayat, T.F., Khan, A.I. and Khan, N. (2002). Effect of sowing dates on yield and yield components of mash bean varieties. Asian J. Pl. Sci., 1: 622-624.
  2. Bozoglu, H., Peksen, E., Peksen, A. and Gulumser, A. (2007). Determination of the yield performance and harvesting periods of fifteen pea (Pisum sativum l.) cultivars sown in autumn and spring, Pak. J. Bot., 39(6): 2017-2025.
  3. Dapaah, H.K., Mckenzie, B.A. and Hill, G.D. (2000). Influence of sowing date and irrigation on the growth and yield of pinto beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) in a subhumid temperate environment. J. Agric. Sci., 134: 33-43.
  4. Dass, A., Patnaik, U. S. and Sudhishri, S. (2005). Response of vegetable pea (Pisum sativum) to sowing date and phosphorus under on-farm conditions. Indian J. Agron., 50(1): 64-66.
  5. Gomez, K.A. and Gomez, A.A. (1983). Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York. 
  6. Green, C.F., Paulson, G.A. and Ivins, J. D. (1985). Time of sowing and the development of winter wheat. J. Agric. Sci., 105: 217-221.
  7. ISTA (1987): Handbook of Vigour Test Methods. Second edition. International Seed Testing Association, Zurich, Switzerland. 72 p.
  8. Knott, C. M. and Belcher, S. J. (1998). Optimum sowing dates and plant populations for winter peas (Pisum sativum). J. Agric. Sci., 131: 449-454.
  9. Moniruzzaman, M., Rahman, S.M.L., Kibria, M.G., Rahman, M.A. and Kaisar, M.O. (2007). Performances of vegetable french bean as influenced by varieties and sowing dates in rabi season. Int. J. Sustain. Crop Prod., 2(5):69-73.
  10. Munier-Jolain, N. and Carrouee. B. (2003). Considering pea in sustainable agriculture: agricultural and environmental arguments. Cahiers Agricultures, 12: 111-120.
  11. Salter, P.J. (1963). The effect of wet or dry soil conditions at different growth stages on the components of yield of a pea crop. J. Hort. Sci., 38: 321-324.
  12. Siddique, A.B., Wright, D. and Ali, S. M. (2002). Effects of sowing dates on the phenology, seed yield and yield components of peas. J. Biol. Sci., 2(5): 300-303.
  13. Silim, S. N., Hebblethwaite, P. D. and Heath, M. C. (1985). Comparison of the effects of autumn and spring sowing date on growth and yield of combining peas (Pisum sativum L.). Article author querysilim sn [PubMed] J. Agric. Sci. 104: 35-46.
  14. Vange, T. and Obi, I.U. (2006). Effect of planting date on some agronomic traits and grain yield of upland rice varieties at Makurdi, Benue State, Nigeria. J. Sustain. Dev. Agric. & Env. 2: 1-9 (ISSN 0794-8867)
  15. Yadav, A. K., Chauhan, S. K., Singh, S. K., and Goyal, V. (2010). Effect of sowing dates and nitrogen levels on growth and yield of vegetable pea (Pisum sativum L.) and its residual effect on wheat (Triticum aestivum) and maize (Zea mays) in vegetable pea-wheat-maize cropping sequence. Indian J. Agric. Sci., 80: 1085-1088.
Reviewed By

Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)