Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.391

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Legume Research, volume 37 issue 1 (february 2014) : 37-46

MORPHOLOGICAL RESPONSE OF SOYBEAN UNDER WATER STRESS DURING POD DEVELOPMENT STAGE

T.V. Shadakshari, K.R. Yathish*, T. Kalaimagal, C. Gireesh, K. Gangadhar, Jaggal Somappa
1 Centre for Plant Breeding and Genetics, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore- 641003, India
Cite article:- Shadakshari T.V., Yathish* K.R., Kalaimagal T., Gireesh C., Gangadhar K., Somappa Jaggal (2024). MORPHOLOGICAL RESPONSE OF SOYBEAN UNDER WATER STRESS DURING POD DEVELOPMENT STAGE. Legume Research. 37(1): 37-46. doi: 10.5958/j.0976-0571.37.1.006.

ABSTRACT

An investigation was undertaken to elucidate information on the effects of water stress on yield and yield attributes of soybean {Glycine max (L.) Merrill} at pod development stage. The soybean accessions viz., JS92-22-A, IC18596, IC9311, IC216380, IC110399JS (SH) 99-02, IC16040, IC16040 and VLS53 showed better performance for morphological traits under water stress condition. Among the morphological traits studied, days to maturity showed the maximum reduction (94%) followed by harvest index (69%) and seed yield per plant (55%), while plant height was recorded the lowest reduction of 16% at pod development stage under water stress condition. The genotype VLS53 showed the highest drought tolerance index for seed yield.

REFERENCES

  1. Anonymous. (2010). Director’s report and summary Tables of Experiments (2009-2010) of All Iindia Coordinated Research Project on Soybean , Directorate of Soybean Research, Indore,Madhya Pradesh.p-6.
  2. Kokubun, M., Shimada, S and Takahashi, M. (2001). Flower abortion caused by parenthesis water deficit is not attributed to impairment of pollen in soybean. Crop Sci. 4: 1517-1521.
  3. Liu, F., Andersen, M.N and Jensen, C.R. (2003). Loss of pod set caused by drought stress is associated with water status and ABA content of reproductive structures in soybean. Funct. Plant Biol. 30: 271-280.
  4. Reddy, T. Y., Reddy, V.R and Anbumozhi, V. (2003). Physiological responses of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) to drought stress and its amelioration: A critical review. Plant Growth Regul. 41: 75-88.
  5. Sernaa, R., Kohashi-Shibataa, J., Acosta-Gallegosb, J.A., Trejo-Lopeza, C and Jortiz Cereceresc. (2004). Biomass distribution, maturity acceleration and yield in drought-stressed common bean cultivars. Field Crops Res. 85: 203-211.
  6. Shao, H.B., Chu, L.Y., Abdul-Jaleel, C and Zhao, C.X. (2008). Water deficit stress induced anatomical changes in higher plants. Current Res. Biologies. 331:215-225.
  7. Songri, P., Jogloy, S., Holbrook, C.C., Kesmala, T., Vorasoot, N., Akkasaeng, C and Patanothai, A. (2009). Association `    of root, specific leaf area and SPAD meter reading to water use efficiency of peanut under different available soil water. Agric. Water Manage. 96: 790-798.
  8. Specht, J.E., Chase, K., Macrander, M., Graef, G.L., Chung, J., Markwell, J.P., Germann, M., Orf, V and Lark, K.G. (2001). Soybean response to water. A QTL analysis of drought tolerance. Crop Sci.41: 493–509.
  9. Vorasoot, N., Songsri, P., Akkasaeng, C., Jogloy, S and Patanothai, A. (2003). Effect of water stress on yield and agronomic characters of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). J. Sci. Technol. 25: 283-288.
Reviewed By

Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)