Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.391

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Legume Research, volume 37 issue 5 (october 2014) : 532-536

MICRO ANALYSIS OF YIELD GAP AND PROFITABILITY IN PULSES AND CEREALS

N.V. Kumbhare*, S.K. Dubey1, M.S. Nain, Ram Bahal
1Division of Agricultural Extension, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi-110 012, India
Cite article:- Kumbhare* N.V., Dubey1 S.K., Nain M.S., Bahal Ram (2024). MICRO ANALYSIS OF YIELD GAP AND PROFITABILITY IN PULSES AND CEREALS. Legume Research. 37(5): 532-536. doi: 10.5958/0976-0571.2014.00671.7.

ABSTRACT

The present study was conducted at farmers’ field in Mathura and Ghaziabad districts of Uttar Pradesh and Bahadurgarh and Gurgaon districts in Haryana during 2010 to 2012. The results of micro yield gap analysis from a sample size of 120 farmers revealed that the average yield gap-I (technology gap) for pigeonpea was 1167 kg/ha in Uttar Pradesh and 1250 kg/ha in Haryana. While, the average yield gap-II (extension gap) for pigeonpea was relatively lower i.e. 183 kg/ha in Uttar Pradesh and 125 kg/ha in Haryana. The average yield gap-I for chickpea was observed as 1641 kg/ha in Uttar Pradesh and 877 kg/ha in Haryana. Whereas, the average yield gap-II for chickpea was relatively lower i.e. 614 kg/ha in Uttar Pradesh and 622 kg/ha in Haryana. However, there was lower yield gap for paddy and wheat in both the states i.e. Uttar Pradesh and Haryana in comparison to pulses (pigeonpea and chickpea). Therefore, it is summarized that technology gap in pulses (pigeonpea and chickpea) was more than extension gap at farmers field. The potential interventions and various constraints of yield gap in major pulses have been highlighted in this paper.

REFERENCES

  1. Boubaker (2005). A paper contributed by FAO to the 4th International Food Legumes Research Conference (IFLRC-IV) held in New Delhi, India, on18-22 October 2005.
  2. Burman, R.R. Singh, S.K. Singh, A.K. (2010). Gap in adoption of improved pulse production technologies in Uttar Pradesh. Indian Research Journal of Extension Education; 10:99-104.
  3. Jadhav, M.S., Waiwal, V.D., Gavali, A.V. (2010). Yield gap analysis of Chickpea in Maharashtra. Agricultural Situation in India; 67: 429-433.
  4. Kannaiyan, S. (1999). Bioresources Technology for Sustainable Agriculture Associated Publishing Company, New Delhi. p.4-22.
  5. Masood Ali and Shiv Kumar (2006). Paradigm shift in planning needed. The Hindu Survey of Indian Agriculture, 63-65.
  6. Ministry of Agriculture, GOI (2012). http://www. agricoop.nic.in/agristatistics
  7. Patole, S.D. Shinde, H.R. Yadav, D.B. (2008). Chickpea production in Ahmednagar district of Maharashtra: a technological gap analysis. Journal of Food Legumes; 21:270-273.
  8. Piara Singh, Vijaya, D. Srinivas, K. Wani, S.P. (2006). Potential productivity, yield gap, and water balance of soybean- chickpea sequential systematic selected benchmark sites in India. Journal of SAT Agricultural Research; 2: 1-50.
  9. Rao, P.P. Birthal,P.S. Bhagavatula, S. Bantilan, M.C.S. (2010). Chickpea and pigeonpea economies in Asia: facts, trends and outlook. VI+ 68pp.25.
Reviewed By

Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)