Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.391

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Legume Research, volume 36 issue 4 (august 2013) : 323-330

RESPONSE OF PIGEONPEA(CAJANUS CAJAN) + MUNGBEAN (PHASEOLUS RADIATUS) INTERCROPPING SYSTEM TO PHOSPHORUS AND BIOFERTILIZERS

Jitendra Kumar Malik, Ravindra Singh*, O.V.S. Thenua, Anil Kumar1
1Amar Singh (P.G.) College, Lakhaoti, Bulandshahr- 245 407, India
  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Malik Kumar Jitendra, Singh* Ravindra, Thenua O.V.S., Kumar1 Anil (2024). RESPONSE OF PIGEONPEA(CAJANUS CAJAN) + MUNGBEAN (PHASEOLUS RADIATUS) INTERCROPPING SYSTEM TO PHOSPHORUS AND BIOFERTILIZERS . Legume Research. 36(4): 323-330. doi: .
A field investigation was carried out during the kharif season of 2005-06 and 2006-07. Present study revealed that inter cropping of mungbean did not show adverse effect on the growth attributes, yield attributes and yield of pigeonpea. Phosphorus application @ 40 and 80 kg P2O5/ha and seed inoculation with Rhizobium and Rhizobium + Phosphorus Solubalizing Bacteria (PSB) significantly improved growth and yield attributes and grain yield of pigeonpea and pigeonpea + mungbean inter-cropping system. Cropping system (intercropping) markedly recorded higher pigeonpea equivalent yield (1451 and 1751 kg/ha) over sole pigeonpea (1235 and 1476 kg/ha) in both the years, respectively. The intercropping of mungbean in pigeonpea did not affect grain yield of pigeonpea (1194 and 1443 kg/ha) and instead gave an additional grain yield of mungbean (237 and 256 kg/ha). This additional grain yield of mungbean along with pigeonpea grain yield significantly produced higher pigeonpea equivalent yield (1451 and 1719 kg/ha) over sole pigeonpea as well as sole mungbean. The pigeonpea + mungbean intercropping system recorded significantly higher organic carbon in soil over sole pigeonpea. The phosphorus applied to crops markedly enhanced organic carbon, available P and K content of soil after the harvest of pigeonpea and mungbean.
  1. Ahlawat, I.P.S., Saraf, C.S. and Singh, A. (1985). Production potential of summer and rainy season pigeonpea intercropped with cowpea and green gram. Indian J. Agric. Sci., 55: 565-569.
  2. Chaudhari, P.R. and Gavhane, V.N. (2005). Effects of phosphate solubilizing biofertilizers on growth, nutrient uptake and yield of pigeonpea cv. ICPL-87. Research-on-Crops, 6(3): 454-456.
  3. Cochran, W.G. and Cox, G.M. (1957). Experimental Designs. 2nd edition, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York.
  4. Jat, H.S., Ahlawat, I.P.S. and Jat, M.L. (2000). Effect of land layouts, post-monsoon irrigation and fertilizers on nutrient uptake, water use efficiency and soil moisture extraction pattern by pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan). Journal of Farming System Research and Development 6(1&2): 138-141.
  5. Jat, H.S. and Ahlawat, I.P.S. (2003). Response of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) + groundnut (Arachis hypogaea) intercropping system to planting and phosphorus management. Indian Journal of Agronomy 48(3): 156-159.
  6. Kantwa, S.R., Ahlawat, I.P.S. and Gangaih, B. (2005). Effect of land configuration, post-monsoon irrigation and phosphorus on performance of sole and intercropped pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan). Indian Journal of Agronomy 50(4): 278-280.
  7. Kantwa, S.R., Ahlawat, I.P.S. and Gangaiah, B. (2006). Performance of Sole and inter cropped pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) as influenced by land configuration, post-monsoon irrigation and phosphorus fertilization. Indian Journal of Agronomy 76(10): 635-637.
  8. Tisdale, S.L, Nelson, W.L., Beaton, J.D. and Havlin, J.L. (1995) Soil Fertility and Fertilizers. Fifth Edition, New Delhi, Prentice hall of India Pvt Ltd, pp 62-75.

Editorial Board

View all (0)