Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.391

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Legume Research, volume 36 issue 4 (august 2013) : 284-288

CORRELATION AND PATH COEFFICIENT ANALYSIS FOR YIELD COMPONENTS OF VEGETABLE SOYBEAN IN NORTH-EAST CHINA

Y.S. Li1, M. Du, Q.Y. Zhang*, M. Hashemi2, X.B. Liu, S.J. Hebert2
1Key Laboratory of Mollisol Agroecology, Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Harbin 150081, China

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Li1 Y.S., Du M., Zhang* Q.Y., Hashemi2 M., Liu X.B., Hebert2 S.J. (2024). CORRELATION AND PATH COEFFICIENT ANALYSIS FOR YIELD COMPONENTS OF VEGETABLE SOYBEAN IN NORTH-EAST CHINA. Legume Research. 36(4): 284-288. doi: .

ABSTRACT

Correlation coefficients and path coefficients of fresh pod yield and yield components of vegetable soybean were investigated in 2010. Thirty vegetable soybean genotypes were grown at the rate of 28 plants m-2 in a randomized complete block design with three replications in field condition in Northeast China. The results showed that fresh pod yield was positively correlated with 3-seed pod per plant (0.81**), 2-seed pod per plant (0.76**), 2-seed pod width (0.59**) and 100-fresh seed weight (0.47**), and negatively correlated with plant height (-0.75**) and 2-seed pod length (-0.64**). Path coefficient analysis also revealed that 3-seed pod per plant (0.58) had the greatest direct positive effect on fresh pod yield, followed by 2-seed pod per plant (0.56), 2-seed pod width (0.31), and 100 fresh seed weight (0.23), whereas plant height (-0.36) and 2-seed length (-0.35) had negative direct effect on fresh pod yield. It wasconcluded that more considerations should be given to the number of seed pod per plant, 2-seed pod width, 100-fresh seed weight, plant height, and 2-seed pod length when selecting higher fresh pod yield of vegetable soybean.

REFERENCES

  1. Arshad, M., Ali, N. and Ghafoor, A. (2006). Character correlation and path coefficient in soybean Glycine max (L.) Merrill. Pak. J. Bot. 38(1): 121-130.
  2. Bizeti, H.S., Carvalho, C.G.P., Souza, J.R.P. and Destro, D. (2004). Path analysis under multicollinearity in soybean. Braz. Arch. Biol. Techn. 47(5): 669-676.
  3. Brar, G.S. and Carter, T.E. (1993) Soybean(Glycine max (L.) Merrill), p. 427-763. In: G. Kalloo and B.O. Bergh(ed.). Genetic improvement of vegetable crops. Pergamon Press, N.Y.
  4. Board, J.E., Kang, M.S. and Harville, B.G. (1999). Path analysis of the yield formation process for late planted soybean. Agron. J. 91(1): 128-135.
  5. Cramer, C.S. and Wehner, T.C. (2000). Path analysis of the correlation between fruit number and plant traits of cucumber populations. Hortscience 35(4): 708-711
  6. Ernst, M. and Woods, T. (2001) Marketing challenges for emerging crops in Kentucky: Vegetable soybeans. 10 Apr.2006. <http://www.uky.edu/Ag/NewCrops/mkt_vegsoy.pdf>
  7. Gan, Y.T., Liu, P.H., Stevenson, F.C. and McDonald, C.L. (2003). Interrelationships among yield components of chickpea in semiarid environments. Can. J. Plant Sci. 83(4): 759-767.
  8. Karasu, A., Oz, M., Goksoy, A.T. and Turan, Z.M. (2009). Genotype by environment interactions, stability, and heritability of seed yield and certain agronomical traits in soybean Glycine max (L.) Merr. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 8(4): 580-590.
  9. Kobraee, S., Shamsi, K. and Rasekhi, B. (2010). Investigation of correlation analysis and relationships between grain yield and other quantitative traits in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Afr. J. Biotechnol. 9(16): 2342-2348.
  10. Lin, C.C. (2001). Frozen Edamame: Global Market Conditions. Second International Vegetable Soybean conference, USA. 93-97.
  11. Liu, B., Liu, X.B., Wang, C., Jin, J., Herbert, S.J. and Hashemi, M. (2010). Responses of soybean yield and yield components to light enrichment and planting density. Int. J. Plant Prod. 4(1): 17-26.
  12. Machikowa, T. and Laosuwan, P. (2011). Path coefficient analysis for yield of early maturing soybean. Songklanakarin J. Sci. Technol. 33(4): 365-368.
  13. Malik, M.F.A., Ashraf, M., Qureshi, A.S. and Ghafoor., A. (2007). Assessment of genetic variability, correlation and path analyses for yield and its components in soybean. Pak. J. Bot. 39(2): 405-413.
  14. Oz, M., Karasu, A., Goksoy, A.T. and Turan, Z.M. (2009). Interrelationships of agronomical characteristics in soybean (Glycine max) grown in different environments. Int. J.Agric. Biol. 11(1): 85-88.
  15. Mebrahtu, T. and Devine, T.E. (2008). Combining ability analysis for selected green pod yield components of vegetable soybean genotypes (Glycine max). New Zeal. J. Crop Hort. 36(2): 97-105
  16. Showkat, M. and Tyagi, S.D. (2010). Correlation and path coefficient analysis of some quantitative traits in soybean (Glycine max l. Merrill). Res. J. Agric. Sci. 1(2): 102-106.
  17. Rao, M., Bhagsari, A. and Mohamed, A. (2002). Fresh green seed yield and seed nutritional traits of vegetable soybean genotypes. Crop Sci. 42(6): 1950-1958.
  18. Salahuddin, S., Abro, M., Kandhro, M., Salahuddin, L. and Laghari, S. (2010). Correlation and path coefficient analysis of yield components of upland cotton [Gossypium hirsutum (L.)] sympodial. World App. Sci. J. 8(special): 71-75.
  19. Udensi, O., Ikpeme, E.V., Edu, E.A. and Ekpe, D.E. (2012). Relationship studies in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp) landraces grown under humid lowland condition. Int. J. Agric. Res. 7(1): 33-45.
  20. Zhang, Q.Y., Gao, Q.L., Herbert, S.J., Li, Y.S. and Hashemi, M. (2010). Influence of sowing date on phenological stages, seed growth and marketable yield of four vegetable soybean cultivars in Northeastern USA. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 5(18): 2556-2562.
Reviewed By

Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)