Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.391

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Legume Research, volume 36 issue 4 (august 2013) : 355-358

IDENTIFICATION OF HETEROTIC HYBRIDS FOR SEED YIELD AND ITS ATTRIBUTING TRAITS IN PIGEONPEA

A.H. Gedam, A.B. Jadhav, A.B. Bagade*, I.A. Madrap
1Department of Agricultural Botany, Marathwada Agriculture University, Parbhani 431 402, India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Gedam A.H., Jadhav A.B., Bagade* A.B., Madrap I.A. (2024). IDENTIFICATION OF HETEROTIC HYBRIDS FOR SEED YIELD AND ITS ATTRIBUTING TRAITS IN PIGEONPEA. Legume Research. 36(4): 355-358. doi: .

ABSTRACT

Heterosis for seed yield and its components were estimated in 40 crosses obtained by crossing 4 female lines with ten male testers in LXT fashion. BSMR-736 and ICPH-2671 were used as standard checks. The analysis of variance revealed significant differences among the parents and hybrids for all the characters studied. Non-additive gene effects were predominant for all the characters, except for days to 50% flowering. The crosses ICPL-3406 x BSMR-23, ICPL-20106 x ICPR-3477, ICPL-3450 x AKT-9913 were best crosses showed high heterosis over mid parents and better parent for grain yield/plant respectively, with 144.98 and 61.31 over the standard check BSMR-736 and ICPH-2671 respectively for grain yield plant.

REFERENCES

  1. Acharya, S., J.B. Patel, C.J. Tank and A.S. Yadav, (2009). Heterosis and combining ability studies Indo-African crosses of pigeonpea. J. Food Legumes, 22 (2): 91-95.
  2. Aher, G.U., I.A. Madrap, M.A. Tike and D.R. Gore (2006). Heterosis and inbreeding depression in pigeonpea. J.Maharashtra Agric. Univ., 31(1): 33-37.
  3. Deshmukh,R.B., R.G. Rodge, J.V. Patil and D.V. Sahane. (2007). Heterosis for yield and yield components in relation to cropping system in pigeonpea. Legume Res., 24 (2): 101-104.
  4. Fonesea, S. and Patterson. F.L. (1968). Hybrid vigour in a seven parental diallel cross in common winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Crop Science. 8:85-88
  5. Pandey, N. (1999). Heterosis and combining ability in pigeonpea. Legume Res., 22 (3): 147-151.
  6. Pandey, N. (2004). Line x tester analysis in long duration hybrid pigeonpea. Legume Res., 27 (2): 79-87.
  7. Reddy Sekhar, M., S.P. Singh, R.B. Mehra and J.N. Govil. (2004). Combining ability and heterosis in early maturing pigeonpea hybrids. Indian J. Genet., 64 (3): 212-216.
  8. Sarode, S.B, M.N. Singh and U.P. Singh (2009). Heterosis in long duration pigeonpea. International J. Plant Sciences. 4 (1) : 106-108.
  9. Verulkar, S.B. and D.P. Singh. (1997). Heterosis in pigeonpea. International Chickpea and Pigeonpea Newsletter. 4 :33-34
Reviewed By

Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)