Cowpea yield under the influence of cropping system, location and nitrogen fertilization

DOI: 10.18805/lr.v39i3.10753    | Article Id: LR-249 | Page : 435-441
Citation :- Cowpea yield under the influence of cropping system,location and nitrogen fertilization .Legume Research-An International Journal.2016.(39):435-441

Erick Sebetha* and Albert Modi1
Address :

Crop Science Department, School of Agriculture, Science and Technology, North-West University, Mafikeng Campus, Private Bag x 2046, Mmabatho 2735.

Submitted Date : 7-09-2015
Accepted Date : 13-05-2016


Yield production of cowpea depends largely on the environmental factors, cropping systems and soil type of the location. In this way, an experiment was conducted to investigate the interaction effect of cropping system, location, season and nitrogen fertilization on cowpea yield. The study comprised of three cropping systems (Maize-cowpea rotation, monocropping cowpea and intercropped cowpea), three locations (Potchefstroom, Taung, and Rustenburg, South Africa) and two rates of nitrogen fertilizers applied in kg ha-1 at each site (0 and 20 at Potchefstroom, 0 and 17 at Rustenburg, 0 and 23 at Taung). A factorial experiment randomized in complete block design with three replications was conducted during 2011/12 and 2012/13 planting seasons. The measured yield and yield components were pod length, seed per pod, pods mass at harvest, grain yield and field biomass yield. Cowpea planted on monocropping and rotational systems had significantly (P < 0.05) higher seed number per pod at harvest, grain yield and field biomass yield than cowpea planted on intercropping. The interaction of location x season plays a vital role on cowpea production by increasing yield. A single cultivar might differ significantly across different locations due to different soil types and climatic factors.


Intercropping Location Monocropping Rotational Yield.


  1. Abayomi, Y.A., Ajibade, T.V., Sammuel, O.F. and Saadudeen, B.F. (2008). Growth and yield responses of cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp] genotypes to nitrogen fertilizer (NPK) application in the Southern Guinea Savanna zone of Nigeria. Asian Journal of Plant Science. 7: 170-176.
  2. Adeoye, P.A., Adebayo, S.E. and Musa, J.J. (2011). Growth and yield responses of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) to poultry and cattle manure as amendments on sandy loam soil plot. Agricultural Journal. 6 : 218-221.
  3. Amujoyegbe, B.J. and Elemo, K.A. (2013). Growth performance of maize/cowpea in intercrop as influenced by time of introducing cowpea and nitrogen fertilizer. International Research Journal Plant Science. 4: 1-11.
  4. Azarpour, E., Danesh, R.K., Mohammadi, S., Bozorgi, H.R. and Moraditochaee, M. (2011). Effect of nitrogen fertilizer under foliar spraying of humic acid on yield and yield components of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata). World Applied Sciences Journal. 13: 1445-1449.
  5. Aziz, M., Mahmood, A., Asif, M. and Ali, A. (2015). Wheat based intercropping: A Review. The Journal of Animal & Plant Sciences. 25: 896-907. 
  6. Bado, B.V., Lompo, F., Bationo, A., Segda, Z., Sedogo, P.M. and Cescas, M.P. (2011). Contribution of cowpea and fallow to soil fertility improvement in the Guinea Savannah of West Africa. Innovations as key to the Green Revolution in Africa: 859-866.
  7. Birteeb, P.T., Addah, W., Jakper, N. and Addo-Kwafo, A. (2011). Effects of intercropping cereal-legume on biomass and grain yield in the savannah zone. Livestock Research for Rural Development. 23 (198).
  8. Blade, S.F., Shetty, S.V.R., Terao, T. and Singh, B.B. (1997). Recent developments in cowpea cropping systems research. In Singh, B.B., Mohan Raj, D.R., Dashiell, K.E., & Jackai, L.E.N. (Eds.) Advances in Cowpea Research. International Institute of Tropical Agriculture and Japan International Research Center for Agricultural Sciences.
  9. Blesh, J. and Drinkwater, L.E. (2013). The impact of nitrogen sources and crop rotation on nitrogen mass balances in Mississippi River Basin. Ecological Application. 23: 1017-1035.
  10. Botha, A.D.P., Snyman, H.G., Hahne, H.C.H., Prinsloo, A.L., Steenkamp, C.J. and Duplessis, D.P. (1968). Eienskappe van die gronde van die navorsings institute vir Tabak. Tegniese Mededeling 74. Rustenburg: Department van Landbou-    Tegniese Dienste.
  11. Chianu, J.N., Huising, J., Danso, S., Okoth, P., Chianu, J.N. and Sanginga, N. (2010). Financial value of nitrogen fixation in soybean in Africa: Increasing benefits for smallholder farmers. Journal of Life Sciences. 4: 50-59.
  12. Egbe, O.M., Alibo, S.E. and Nwueze, I. (2010). Evaluation of some extra-early and early-maturity cowpea varieties for intercropping with maize in Southern Guinea for intercropping with maize in Southern Guinea Savanna of Nigeria. Agricultural and Biology Journal of North America. 1: 845-858.
  13. Gidago, G., Bayene, S. and Worku, W. (2011). The response of haricot bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) to phosphorus application on ultisols at Areka, Southern Ethopia. Journal of Biology, Agriculture and Healthcare. 1: 38-49. 
  14. Gomez, K.A. and Gomez, A.A. (1984). Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. John Wiley and Sons. New York.
  15. Hasan, M.R., Akbar, M.A., Khandaker, Z.A. and Rahman, M.M. (2010). Effect of nitrogen fertilizer on yield contributing character, biomass yield and nutritive value of cowpea forage. Bang. J. Anim. Sci. 39: 83-88.
  16. Ishiyaku, M.F. and Aliyu, H. (2013). Field evaluation of cowpea genotypes for drought tolerance and striga resistance in the dry savannah of the north-west Nigeria. International Journal of Plant Breeding and Genetics. 7: 47-56.
  17. Katsaruware, R.D. and Manyanhaire, I.O. (2009). Maize-cowpea intercropping and weed suppression in leaf stripped and detasselled maize in Zimbabwe. Electronic Journal of Environmental Agriculture and Food Chemistry. 8 : 1218-1226.
  18. Kureh, I., Kamara, A.Y. and Tarfa, B.D. (2006). Influence of cereal-legume rotation on striga control and maize grain yield in farmer fields in the Northern Guinea Savanna of Nigeria. Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development in the Tropics and Subtropics. 107: 41-54. 
  19. Macvicar, C.N., De Villiers, J.M., Loxton, R.F., Verster, E., Lambrechts, J.J.N., Merryweather, F.R., Le Roux, J., Van Rooyen, T.H. and Harmse, H.J. (1977). Soil classification. A binomial system for South Africa. Science Bull. 390, ARC-Institute for Soil Climate and Water, Pretoria.
  20. Martellotto. A. (2010). The impact of long term tillage, crop rotation and N application on soil carbon sequestration. Theses, Dissertations and Student Research in Agronomy and Horticulture. Paper 20.
  21. Mwanarusi, S., Itulya, F.M., Aguyoh, J.N. and Mshenga, P.M. (2010). Yields and profitability of a dual-purpose sole cowpea and cowpea-maize intercrop as influenced by cowpea leaf harvesting frequency. ARPN Journal of Agricultural and Biological Science. 5: 65-71.
  22. Nyasasi, B.T. and Kisetu, E. (2014). Determination of land productivity under maize-cowpea intercropping system in agro-ecological zone of mount Uluguru in Morogoro, Tanzania. Global Journal of Agricultural Science. 2: 147-157.
  23. Nyoki, D. and Ndakidemi, P.A. (2014). Effects of Bradyrhizobium japonicum and phosphorus supplementation on the productivity of legumes. International Journal of Plant & Soil Science. 3: 894-910.
  24. Pule-Meulenberg, F., Belane, A.K., Krasova-Wadet, T. and Dakora, F.D. (2010). Symbiotic functioning and bradyrhizobial biodiversity of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.) in Africa. BMC Microbiology.
  25. Soil Survey Staff. (1999). Keys to soil taxonomy (8th edn.). Poca-hontas Press Inc., Blacksburg. Virginia.
  26. Vesterager, J.M., Nielsen, N.E. and Hogh-Jensen, H. (2007). Nitrogen budgets in a crop sequences with or without phosphorus fertilized cowpea in the maize-based cropping system of semi-arid eastern Africa. African Journal of Agricultural Research. 2: 261-268.
  27. Yusuf, A.A., Iwuafor, E.N.O., Abaidoo, R.C., Olufajo, O.O. and Sanginga, N. (2009). Grain legume rotation benefits to maize in the northern guinea savannah of Nigeria: fixed-nitrogen versus other rotation effects. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosys. 84: 129-139. 

Global Footprints