Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.391

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Legume Research, volume 38 issue 3 (june 2015) : 358-362

Effect of Fe (iron) and Mo (molybdenum) application on the yield and yield parameters of lentil (Lens culinaris Medic.)

N Togay* Y. Togay, M. Erman, F. Çig
1Yuzuncu Yil University, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Field Crops, Van, Turkey.
Cite article:- Togay Y. Togay* N, Erman M., Çig F. (2024). Effect of Fe (iron) and Mo (molybdenum) application on the yield and yield parameters of lentil (Lens culinaris Medic.). Legume Research. 38(3): 358-362. doi: 10.5958/0976-0571.2015.00120.4.

ABSTRACT

The study was carried out to determine the effect of different levels of iron (0, 5, 10 and 20 kg ha-1) and molybdenum (0, 2, 4 and 6 g kg-1 seed) on the yield and yield components in lentil (Lens culinaris Medic. cv. Sazak-91). The experiments were conducted in a factorial design with three replications during 2006-07 and 2008-09 in Van, Turkey. The highest seed yield was obtained from 20 kg ha-1 iron with 956 kg ha-1 and 6 g kg-1 seed molybdenum levels with 963 kg ha-1 in the first year, while it was obtained from 20 kg ha-1 iron with 1031 kg ha-1 and 6 g kg-1 seed molybdenum with 1010 kg ha-1 in the second year. Seed nutrient contents such as protein rate, phosphorus, manganese, copper and molybdenum significantly increased under the influence of iron and molybdenum treatments over control.

REFERENCES

  1. AOAC (Association of Official Analytical Chemists-International) (1990). Official methods of analysis, 15th ed. AOAC- Int., Arlington, VA.
  2. Aydeniz A (1985). Soil amendment. Ankara Univ. Agricultural Fac. Pub. 928, Practice Guide, p. 263.
  3. Bhanavase, D.B., and P.L. Patil. (1994). Effect of molybdenum on nodulation in gram. J. Maharashtra. Agric. Univ. 19: 127-129.
  4. Brar, J. S. and Sidhu A S. (1992). Effect of Rhizobium Inoculation under Different Levels of Phosphorus and Molybdenum on N, P, and Mo contents of straw and Seeds of Moong (Phaseolus aureus Roxb.).
  5. Ciftçi, C. Y and Sehirali S. (1984). The determination of varies phenotype and genotype differences in dry bean species. Ankara Univ. Institute of Science Publishing No, No:Field Crops 4, Ankara, p. 17.
  6. Erskine, W., Saxena, N. P. and Saxena, M. C. (1993). Iron deficiency in lentil: Yield loss andgeographic distribution in a germplasmcollection. Plant Soil 151: 249-254.
  7. FAO, (2013). Food and Agriculture Organization. http// www.fao.org.
  8. Kacar, B. (1984). Plant nutrition. Ankara Univ. Agricultural Fac. Pub.: 899 Practice Guide: 250.
  9. Kacar, B. and Inal A. (2008). Plant Analysis. Nobel Publications, Pub. No: 1241, Ankara, Turkey, pp: 892. ISBN: 978-605- 395-036-3 (in Turkish).
  10. Katyal, J. and N. S. Randhawa. 1983. Micronutrients. FAO. Fertilizer and Plant Nutrition, Bulletin No. 7. United Nation.
  11. Kaya, Z., Gök, M. and Kaptan, H. (1993). Soil Science (Toprak Bilimi). C.Univ. Agricultural Faculty Publications, Pub. No:73.
  12. Landge, S. K., S. U. Kakade, P. D. Thakare., A. P. Karunakar and D. J. Jiotode. (2002). Response of soybean to nitrogen and phosphorus. Pak. J. Genotypes Sci. 3(3): 653-655.
  13. Lindsay, W.L. and Norwell, W.A. (1969). Development of a DTPA micronutrient soil test. Soil Sci. Am. Proc. 35(1): 600-602.
  14. Maurya, B. R., Kishor K. and Ram P. C. (1993). Effects of iron and molybdenum on urd bean. Maharashtra Agric. Univ., 18(1): 128.
  15. Oguz, F. (2004). Research on the effects of different levels molybdenum application on the yield and some yield components in Chickpea varieties on dry and irrigation conditions. M.Sc. Thesis, Yuzuncu Yýl University Van, Turkey (unpublished).
  16. Rabbani M.G., A.R. Solaiman, K.M. Hossain and T. Hossain. (2005). Effects of Rhizobium Inoculant, nitrogen, phosphorus and molybdenum on nodulation, yield and seed protein in pea. Kor. J. Genotypes Sci. 50(2): 112-119.
  17. Sakal, R., Singh, B.P. and Singh, A.P. (1984) Determination of threshold value of iron in soils and plants for the response of rice and lentil to iron application in calcareous soil. Plant and Soil 82: 141–148.
  18. SAS. (1998). Statistical Analysis Software. Version 6.12. SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA.
  19. Singh, B. P., Sakal R. and Singh A. P. (1985). Response of lentil varieties to iron application on highly calcareous soils of Bihar. Indian Agric.l Sci. 55(1) 56-58.
  20. Srivastava T.K., Ahlawat I.P.S. (1995): Response of pea (Pisum sativum) to phosphorus, molybdenum and biofertilizers. Indian J. Agron., 40: 630–635.
  21. Tahir, M., A. Ali, N. Aabidin, M. Yaseen and H. Rehman. (2011). Effect of molybdenum and seed inoculation on growth, yield and quality of mungbean. Genotypes and Environment. 2(2): 37-40
  22. Togay, Y., Togay N. and Dogan Y. (2008). Research on the effect of phosphorus and molybdenum applications on the yield and yield parameters in lentil (Lens culinaris Medic.) African Biotech 7(9):1256-1260.
  23. TSMS, (2009). Reports of Turkish State Meteorological Service, Ankara, Turkey.
  24. Verma, L.P., P.C. Ram, and B.R. Maurya. (1988). Response of chickpea to phosphorus and molybdenum of eastern Uttar Pradesh, India. Int. Chickpea Newsletter. 18: 31-33.
  25. Vincent, J. M. (1970). A Manual for the Practical Study of Root Nodule Bacteria. Blackwell, oxford, UK.
Reviewed By

Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)