Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.391

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Legume Research, volume 37 issue 6 (december 2014) : 607-613

PERFORMANCE OF LENTIL [Lens culinaris (Medic.)] AS INFLUENCED BY SULPHUR AND PHOSPHORUS FERTILIZATION

Necat Togay*, Dursun Parsak1
1Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Field Crops, Yuzuncu Yil University, Van, Turkey
Cite article:- Togay* Necat, Parsak1 Dursun (2024). PERFORMANCE OF LENTIL [Lens culinaris (Medic.)] AS INFLUENCED BY SULPHUR AND PHOSPHORUS FERTILIZATION. Legume Research. 37(6): 607-613. doi: 10.5958/0976-0571.2014.00684.5.

ABSTRACT

A field experiment in a factorial randomized block design with three replications were conducted to study the effect of three levels of phosphorus (0, 40 and 80 kg ha-1) and four levels of sulphur (0, 30, 60 and 90 kg ha-1) on yield and yield components of Sazak -91 cultivar of lentil in a calcareous alkaline soils in Yuzuncu Yil University campus during 2003 to 2005. The study showed that the lentil seed yield is 1750 kg ha-1 under the treatment of 40 kg ha-1 phosphorus and 90 kg ha-1 as compared to other treatments under study. Information gained from this study will be utilized to develop more efficient sulphur and phosphorus fertilization levels in winter lentil.

REFERENCES

  1. Aktas, M. (1994). Plant nutrition and soil productivity. Ankara Univ. Agricultural Fac. Pub.:1361, Practice Guide:395.
  2. Aydeniz, A. (1985). Soil Amendment. Ankara Univ. Agricultural Fac. Pub.:928, Practice Guide, 263.
  3. Bremner, J.M. (1965). Methods of Soil Analysis, Part: 2, American Society of Agronomy Inc., Publisher Medison, Wiconsin, USA.
  4. Bouyoucos, G.S. (1951). Recalibration of the hydrometer methods for making mechanical analysis of soil. Agronomy J. 43 (1): 434-438.
  5. Cimrin, K.M. Togay, Y., Togay, N. and Sönmez, F. (2008). Effect of different sulphur and pyrite levels on yield, yield components and nutrients uptake of lentil (Lens culinaris Medic.). Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 78 (6):543-7.
  6. Ciftci, C.Y. and Sehirali, S. (1984). The determination of varies phenotype and genotype differences in dry bean species. Ankara Univ. Institute of Science Publishing No, No:Field Crops 4, Ankara pp: 17.
  7. Dwivedi, A. K., Nayak, G. S. and Patel, K. S. (2000). Interaction effects of sulphur and phosphorus fertilizer on yield and nutrient composition of lentil grown on a vertisol. Journal of Soil Sci. & Crops, 2: 203-205.
  8. Eyuboglu, F. (1999). Productivity stage of Turkey’s soils. Republic of Turkey. Ministry of Village Affairs. Soil and Fertilizer Research Institute Pub. General Pub. No:220. Technical Pub. No: T-67.
  9. FAO, (2012). Food and Agriculture Organization. http// www.fao.org.
  10. Jackson, M.L. (1962). Soil Chemical Analysis. Engle Wood Cliff-New Jersey, Prentice Hall Inc.
  11. Kacar, B. (1984). Plant Nutrition. Ankara Univ. Agricultural Fac. Pub.: 899 Practice Guide:250.
  12. Kadýoglu, A. (2004). Plant Physiology. Practice Guide. Trabzon, Turkey.
  13. Kumar, P., Agarwal, J. P. and Chandra, S. (1993). Effect of inoculation, nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization on growth and yield of lentil. Lens Newsletter, 20 (1), 57-59.
  14. Matar A, Tarrent J, Ryan J (1992). Soil and fertilizer phosphorus and crop responses in the dry land Mediterranean zone. Advances in Soil Sci.18 (81):146.
  15. SAS (1998). Statistical Analysis Software. Version 6.12. SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA.
  16. Sekhon, H. S., Kaul, J. N. and Sandhu, T. S., (1998). Effect of sulphur fertilization on growth and yield of lentil. Lens Newsletter, 25 (1/2): 30-32.
  17. Sepetoðlu, H. (2002). Grain legumes. Departmant of Field Crops, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Ege Publication: 24/4, Ýzmir, Turkey.
  18. Shivakumar, B. G., (2001). Perfomance of chickpea (Cicer arientinum) varieties as influenced by sulphur with and without phosphorus. Indian Journal of Argonomy. 46(2): 273- 276.
  19. Singh, B. P. and Singh, B. (1990). Response of french bean to phosphorus and boron in acid alfisols in Meghalaya. Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science, 38 (4): 769-771.Singh, S., Singh, K. P., Sarkar, A. K. and Singh, S. (1998). Effect of sulphur on yield, protein content and S uptake by lentil in acid soil. Journal of Research. 10(2): 131-134;8 ref
  20. Singh, S. P. and Sing C. D. (2002). Response of lentil (Lens culinaris) cultivars to sources and levels of sulphur. Indian Journal of Agronomy 47(1): 94-97.
  21. Togay, Y. (2002). The effect of different zinc and phosphorus levels on the yield and yield components in lentil (Lens culinaris Medic.). Unpublished PhD Thesis Yuzuncu Yýl University, Van, Turkey.
  22. Togay, Y. Togay, N. and Dogan, Y. (2008 a). Research on the effect of phosphorus and molybdenum applications on the yield and yield parameters in lentil (Lens culinaris Medic.) African Journal of Biotechnology 7 (9): 1256-1260
  23. Togay, Y., Togay, N. Erman, M. and Dogan, Y. (2008 b). Performance of dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) as influenced by phosphorus and sulphur fertilization. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 78 (4): 299-303.
  24. Venkateswarlu, U. and Ahlawat I. P. S. (1993). Effect of soil-moisture regime, seed rate and phosphorus fertilizer on growth and yield attributes and yield of late –sown lentil (Lens culinaris). Indian J. Agron. 38 (2): 236-243.
  25. TSMS, (2007). Reports of Turkish State Meteorological Service, Ankara, Turkey.
  26. Usta, S. (1995). Soil chemistry. Agricultural Fac.Pub.No:1387 Practice Guide: 401.
Reviewed By

Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)