Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.391

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Legume Research, volume 37 issue 1 (february 2014) : 11-18

EVALUATION OF WILD SPECIES OF LENTIL FOR AGRO-MORPHOLOGICAL TRAITS

Aditya Pratap*, Jitendra Kumar, Shiv Kumar1
1Crop Improvement Division, Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur-208 024, India
Cite article:- Pratap* Aditya, Kumar Jitendra, Kumar1 Shiv (2024). EVALUATION OF WILD SPECIES OF LENTIL FOR AGRO-MORPHOLOGICAL TRAITS. Legume Research. 37(1): 11-18. doi: 10.5958/j.0976-0571.37.1.002.

ABSTRACT

Most of the existing varieties of lentil (Lens culinaris  ssp. culinaris) have been developed mainly through intraspecific hybridization and pureline selection  leading to a narrow genetic base in cultivated populations. This makes them vulnerable to a number of biotic and abiotic stresses besides reducing their genetic potential due to lesser hidden variability. Distant hybridization involving wild accessions increases genetic variability and also helps in introgression of desirable genes rendering cultivated species more usable. Keeping this in view, wild accessions of lentil procured from ICARDA, Aleppo, Syria were established and evaluated under local conditions at IIPR, Kanpur. These comprised 88 accessions from Lens  nigricans, L. culinaris  ssp. odemensis, L. culinaris  ssp. orientalis, L. culinaris ssp. tomentosus, L. ervoides, L. lamottei and unknown Lens spp. The results showed significant genetic variation among the wild accessions for all characters except cotyledon colour. PCA analysis of the morphological data resulted in clustering of 88 wild accessions into three groups and distinct position of each genotype was observed within each group. The first three most informative components in PCA analysis individually accounted for 89.35, 4.38 and 2.3% of total variation, respectively and collectively these explained about 95% of the total variability.  While more traits and multilocation data need to be considered for getting more reliable results, in general L. ervoides was observed to possess useful traits like plant height, internode length and pods/cluster and therefore could be utilized for genetic improvement of cultivated lentil.

REFERENCES

  1. Ahmad, M., McNeil, D. L. and Sedcole, J. R. (1997) Phylogenetic relationships in Lens species and their interspecific hybrids as measured by morphological characters. Euphytica 94: 101–111.
  2. Bayaa, B., Erskine, W. and Hamdi, A. (1995) Evaluation of a wild lentil collection for resistance to vascular wilt. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 42: 231–235.
  3. Dixit, G.P., Katiyar, P.K. and Singh, B.B. (2011) Characterization of lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.) varieties based on morphological traits. J. Food Legumes 24: 194-197.
  4. Erskine, W. and Saxena, M.C. (1993) Problems and prospects of stress resistance breeding in lentil. Breeding for Stress Tolerance in Cool Season Food Legumes. pp. 51-62. In: Singh K B and Saxena M C . (eds.) ICARDA/Wiley, Chichester, UK.
  5. Erskine, W., Chandra, S., Chaudhary, M., Malik, I.A., Sarker, A., Sharma, B., Tufail, M. and Tyagi, M.C. (1998). A bottleneck in lentil: widening its genetic base in South Asia. Euphytica 101: 207-211.
  6. Esmail, A.M., Mohamed, A.A., Hamdi, A.and Rabie, E.M. (1994). Analysis of yield variation in lentil (Lens culinaris Medik). Ann. Agric. Sci. Moshtohor. 32: 1073-1087.
  7. FAO (2013) FAOSTAT. Available at http://faostat.fao.org/site/567/DesktopDefault.aspx?PageID=567#ancor (last accessed on October 11, 2013)
  8. Ferguson, M.E. and Robertson, L.D. (1999) Morphological and phenological variation in the wild relatives of lentil. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 46: 3-12.
  9. Fiala, J.V., Tullu, A., Banniza, S., Séguin-Swartz, G. and Vandenberg, A. (2009) Interspecies transfer of resistance to anthracnose in lentil Lens culinaris Medic. Crop Sci. 49: 825-8305.
  10. Gupta, D., and Sharma, S. K. (2006) Evaluation of wild Lens taxa for agro-morphological traits, fungal diseases and moisture stress in northwestern Indian hills. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 53:1233-1241.
  11. Hajjar, R., and Hodgkin, T. (2007) The use of wild relatives in crop improvement, A survey of developments over the last 20 years. Euphytica 156:1-13.
  12. Hamdi, A. and Erskine, W. (1996) Reaction of wild species of the genus Lens to drought. Euphytica 91: 173–179.
  13. Hamdi, A., Kusmenoglu, I. and Erskine, W. (1996) Sources of winter hardiness in wild lentil. Gen. Res. Crop Evol. 43:63–67.
  14. Jaccard, P. (1908) Nouvelles recherches sur la distribution florale. Bul. Soc. Vaudoise Sci. Nat. 44: 223–270.
  15. Kumar, J., Pratap, A., Solanki, R.K., Chaturvedi, S.K., Kumar, S. and Nadarajan N. (2012) Genomic Resources for Improving Food Legume crops. J. Agric. Sci. 150: 289-318.
  16. Kumar, S., Gupta, S., Chandra, S. and Singh, B.B. (2004) How wide is the genetic base of pulse crops? Pulses in New Perspective. pp. 211-221.In: Ali M, Singh BB, Kumar S and Dhar V (eds.). Indian Society of Pulses Research and Development, Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur, India.
  17. Kumar, S., Mohammad, I., Gupta, S. and Pratap, A. (2011) Distant Hybridization and alien gene introgression. Biology and Breeding of Food Legumes. pp.: 81-110. In: Aditya Pratap and Jitendra Kumar (eds.) CABI, Oxfordshire, UK.
  18. Ladizinsky, G., Pickersgill, B. and Yamamoto, K. (1988) Exploitation of wild relatives of the food legumes. In World Crops, Cool Season Food Legumes, ed. R. J. Summerfield, pp. 967-987. Dordrecht, The Netherland: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  19. Muehlbauer, F.J. and McPhee, K.E. (2005) Lentil (lens culinaris Medik). Genetic Resources, Chromosome Engineering and Crop Improvement, Grain Legumes. pp 219–230.In: Singh, R.J. and Jauhar, P.P. (eds) Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, USA.
  20. Pandey, A., Singh, D.P. and Singh, B.B. (1992) Interrelationship of yield and yield components in lentil (Lens culinaris Medik) germplasm. Indian. J. Pulses Res. 5: 142-144.
  21. Pratap, A., Kumar, J., Solanki, R.K., Singh, I.P. and Chaturvedi, S.K. (2009). Evaluation of wild accessions of lentil for qualitative and quantitative traits. Proceedings of National Symposium on Achieving millennium development goals: Problems and Prospects. pp. 126-127. October 25-26, 2009, Bundelkhand University, Jhansi (UP).
  22. Rahman, M.M., Sarker, A., Kumar, S., Ali, A., Yadav, N.K., and Rahman, L. (2009) Breeding for short season environments. The lentil: Botany, production and uses. p. 121–136. In: Erskine W, Muehlbauer F, Sarker A, and Sharma B (ed.) CAB Int., Wallingford, UK.
  23. Rolf, F.J. (1998) NTSys-pc: Numerical Taxonomy and Multivariate Analysis System. Version 2.02, New York, Ererter Software.
  24. Singh, D.P. and Singh, B.B. (1991) Evaluation of exotic germplasm in lentil. Narendra Dev J. Agric. Res. 6: 304-306.
  25. Tanksley, S.D. and McCouch, S.R. (1997) Seed banks and Molecular maps, unlocking genetic potential from the wild. Science 277: 1063-1066.
  26. Tullu, A., Banniza, S., Bett K., and Vandenberg A. (2011) A walk on the wild side: Exploiting wild species for improving cultivated lentil. Grain Legumes 56:13-14.
  27. Tullu, A., Buchwaldt, L., Lulsdorf, M., Banniza, S., Barlow, B., Slinkard, A.E., Sarker, A., Tar’an, T.D., Warkentin, T.D. and Vandenberg, A. (2006) Sources of resistance to anthracnose (Colletotrichum truncatum) in wild Lens species. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 53: 111-119.
Reviewed By

Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)