Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.391

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Legume Research, volume 36 issue 6 (december 2013) : 563-568

RESISTANCE OF SELECTED PIGEONPEA, CAJANUS CAJAN (L) MILLSP. CULTIVARS TO CALLOSOBRUCHUS MACULATUS FAB. (COLEOPTERA:BRUCHIDAE)

T. Rosemond, A.Khan*
1Department of Life Sciences, University of the West Indies, St. Augustine Trinidad, West Indies

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Rosemond T., A.Khan* (2024). RESISTANCE OF SELECTED PIGEONPEA, CAJANUS CAJAN (L) MILLSP. CULTIVARS TO CALLOSOBRUCHUS MACULATUS FAB. (COLEOPTERA:BRUCHIDAE). Legume Research. 36(6): 563-568. doi: .

ABSTRACT

Experiments were conducted to compare the oviposition preference of Callosobruchus maculatus on 18 pigeonpea, Cajanus cajan cultivars.  Cultivars B9, B35, B26PL2, B52 and B59 appear to be more resistance to attack by C. maculatus than the other cultivars tested.  Duration from adult parent ovipositing to F1 adult emergence was longest in cultivar B35 (33 days) and shortest in cultivars B59 and B200. The highest mean number of eggs oviposited by parent was on cultivar B26PL2 (3.69 eggs/seed) while the highest by F1 was on cultivar B140PL1 (7.36 eggs/seed). Cultivar B9 had the lowest larval penetration (23.74%) among the cultivars tested while cultivar B26 had the highest adult emergence (90.20%). Highest egg to adult survival occurred on cultivar B188 (65.00%) and lowest on cultivar B59 (10.50%). The Dobie index of susceptibility ranged from 4.61 (B35 and B52) to 7.98 (B200) and was correlated to testa thickness and per cent larval penetration.

REFERENCES

  1. Arnason, J.T., Baum B., Gale J., Lambert, J.D.H, Bergvinson, D., Philogene, B.J.R., Serratos, J.A., Mihm, J., Jewell, D.C. (1994). Variation in resistance of Mexican landraces of maize to maize weevil Sitophilus zeamais, in relation to taxonomic and biochemical parameters. Euphytica 74: 227-236.
  2. Asante, S.K., Mensah, G.W.K. (2007). Evaluation of susceptibility of some elite cowpea cultivars to attack by Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) (Coleptera:Bruchidae). Ghana J Agric Sci. 40: 73-80.
  3. Credland, P.F., Dick, K.M., Wright, A.W. (1986). Relationships between larval density, adult size and egg production in the cowpea seed beetle, Callosobruchus maculatus. Ecol. Entomol. 11: 41-50.
  4. Dasbak, M.A., Echezona, B.C., Asiegbu, J.E. (2009). Pigeon pea grain characteristics and resistance to attack by the bruchid storage pest. Int Agrophysics 23: 19-26.
  5. Devereau, A.D., Gudrups, I., Appleby, J.H., Credland, P.F. (2003). Automatic, rapid screening of seed resistance in cowpea, Vigna unguiciulata (L) Walpers, to the seed beetle Callosobruchus maculatus (F) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) using acoustic monitoring. J.Stored Prod Res. 39(1): 117–129.
  6. Dobie P. (1974). The laboratory assessment of the inherent susceptibility of maize varieties to post-harvest infestation by Sitophilus zeamais. J Stored Prod Res. 10:183-197.
  7. Dongre, T.K., Pawar, S.E., Harwalkar, M.R. (1993). Resistance to Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) in pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp) and other Cajanus species. J Stored Prod Res. 29(4): 319-322
  8. Howe, R.W. (1971). A parameter for expressing the suitability of environment for insect development. J Stored Prod Res.7: 63 – 65.
  9. Huignard, J. (1985). Oviposition and development of Bruchidius atrolineatus (Pic) and Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) (Coleoptera:Bruchidae) in Vigna unguiculata (Walp) cultures in Niger. Insect Sci Appl. 6(6): 691-699.
  10. IBPGR (1993). Descriptors for pigeonpea, Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp. International Board for Plant Genetic Resources, Rome, Italy: International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, Patancheru, India. 32pp.
  11. Lale, N.E.S., Efeovbokhan, S.O. (1991). Resistance status of new cowpea cultivars to a storage insect pest, Callosobruchus maculatus. Postharvest Biol Tec. 1(2): 181-186.
  12. Lale, N.E.S., Kolo, A.A. (1998). Susceptibility of eight genetically improved cultivars of cowpea to Callosobruchus maculatus (F) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) in Nigeria. Int J Pest Manage. 44 (1): 25 – 27.
  13. Loomis, R.S., Beck, S.D., Stauffer, J.F. (1957). The European corn borer, Pyrausta nubilalis (Hbn) and its principal host plant. V. A study of host plant resistance. Plant Physiol. 32(5): 279 – 385.
  14. McCabe, W.L., Smith, J.C., Harriott, P. (1986). Unit operations of chemical engineering. McGaw-Hill Book Company, New York.
  15. Mensah, G.W.K. (1986). Infestation potential of Callosobruchus maculatus (F)(Coleoptera:Bruchidae) on cowpea stored under subtropical conditions. Insect Sci Appl. 7(6): 718-784.
  16. Ofuya, T.I., Credland, P.F. (1995). Differences in the susceptibility of seeds of selected varieties of cowpea to Bruchidius atrolineatus (Coleoptera:Bruchidae). Bull Entomol Res. 85(2): 259-265.
  17. Purseglove, J.W. (1974). Tropical Crops: Dicotyledons, Longman Group Ltd. Singapore.
  18. Souza, A.J., Santos, P.O., Pinto, M.S.T, Wermelinger, T.T., Ribeiro, E.S., Souza, S.C., Deus, M.F., Souza, M.C., Filho, J.X., Fernandes, K.V.S., Oliveira, A.E.A. (2011). Natural seed coats provide protection against penetration by Callosobruchus maculatus (Coleoptera:Bruchidae) larvae. Crop Prot. 30: 651-657.
  19. Turaki, J.M. (2012). Simulating infestations and losses in storage from egg and adult Callosobruchus maculatus (Coleoptera:Bruchidae) sources in cowpea (Vigna ungiculata L. Walp.). Int Res J Agri Sci Soil Sci. 2(8):333-340.
Reviewed By

Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)