Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.391

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Legume Research, volume 36 issue 5 (october 2013) : 396-405

LOW Ca2+/Na+ RATIO AND EFFICIENCY OF MOBILIZATION OF Ca2+ FROM SHOOT TISSUES TO KERNEL DETERMINE SALINITY TOLERANCE IN GROUNDNUT (ARACHIS HYPOGAEA L.)

M.A.K Azad*, M. S. Alam1, M.A. Hamid, M.A. Hossain2
1Plant Breeding Division, Bangladesh Institute of Nuclear Agriculture, Bangladesh Agricultural University Campus, Mymensingh-2202, Bangladesh
  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Azad* M.A.K, Alam1 S. M., Hamid M.A., Hossain2 M.A. (2024). LOW Ca2+/Na+ RATIO AND EFFICIENCY OF MOBILIZATION OF Ca2+ FROM SHOOT TISSUES TO KERNEL DETERMINE SALINITY TOLERANCE IN GROUNDNUT (ARACHIS HYPOGAEA L.). Legume Research. 36(5): 396-405. doi: .
Variety, salinity level and growth stage showed highly significant (Ppod filling>flowering stage. The tolerance of a variety based on economic yield was conferred by its low Ca2+/Na+ ratio in the shoot tissues. Moreover, the variety that could mobilize Ca2+ more at flowering stage from shoot tissues to reproductive organs particularly kernel under salinity stress attained more tolerance. The excess Na+ in shoot tissues of salinity stressed groundnut does not move to flower rather a portion to the kernel. In contrast, K+ and Ca2+ move from shoot tissues to all reproductive organs including flower with being the highest to the kernel.
  1. Azad, M. A. K. (2006). Effect of salt stress on growth and some biochemical attributes in two groundnut genotypes. MS thesis, Dept. of Crop Botany, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, 56p.
  2. Azad, M. A. K. (2008). Genetics of salt tolerance in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Ph.D. disserttation, Dept. of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, 148p.
  3. Azad, M.A.K., Haque, M.M. Hamid, M.A., Yasmine, F. and Golder, M.A.W. (2012). Tolerance to salinity stress in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) through osmotic adjustment and undamaged choloroplast. Legume Res. 35(4):271-284
  4. Azad, M.A.K., Alam, M.S. and Hamid, M.A. (2013). Modification of salt tolerance level in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) Through induced mutation. Legume Res. 36(3): 224-232
  5. BARC, (2005). Fertilizer Recommendation Guide-2005, Bangladesh Agricultural Research Council, Dhaka.
  6. Flowers, T.J, and Yeo, A.R. (1986). Ion relations of plants under drought and salinity. Aust. J. Plant. Physiol.13: 75-91.
  7. Garg, B.K., Kathju, S., Vyas, S.P. and Lahiri, A.N. (1997). Sensitivity of clusterbean to salt stress at various growth stages. Indian J. Plant Physiol. 2(1):49-53.
  8. Gomez, K. A. and Gomez, A. A.(1984). Statistical Procedure for Agricultural Research. Second Edition. A Willey Inter- Science Publication, John Wiley and Sons, New York. p. 680.
  9. Halliwell, B. and Gutteridge, J.M.C. (1985). Free Radicals in Biology and Medicine. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
  10. James, R.A., Rivelli, A.R., Munns, R. and von Caemmerer, S. (2002). Factors affecting CO2 assimilation, leaf injury and growth in salt-stressed durum wheat. Func. Plant. Biol. 29: 1393-1403.
  11. Jeschke, W.D., Aslam, Z. and Green way, H. (1986). Effect of NaCl on ion relations and carbohydrate status of roots and on osmotic regulation of roots and shoots of Atriplex amnicola. Plant Cell Environ. 9: 559-569.
  12. Johnson, C.M. and Ulrich, A. (1959). Analytical method for use in plant analysis. Callifornia Agricultural Experimental Station Bulletin 766: 26-77.
  13. Joshi, Y.C., Ravindra, V., Nautiyal, P.C. and Zala, P.V. (1990). Screening for salt tolerance in groundnut. Groundnut News 2 (1): 4.
  14. Krishnamurty, L., Reddy, B.V.S. and Serraj, R. (2003a). Screening pearl millet germplasm for tolerance to salinity. International Sorghum and Millets Newsletter 44: 90-92.
  15. Krishnamurty, L., Rai, K.N., Hash, C.T. and Serraj, R. (2003b). Screening sorghum germplasm for tolerance to salinity. International Sorghum and Millets Newsletter 44: 155-157.
  16. Maliwal, G.L.(1997). Response of wheat varieties to chloride and sulphate dominant salinity. Indian J.Plant Physiol. 2(3): 225-228.
  17. Munns, R. James, R.A. and Lauchli, A. (2006). Approach to increasing the salt tolerance of wheat and other cereals. J. Exp. Bot. 57: 1025-1030.
  18. Shalhevet, J., Reiniger, P. and Shimsi, D. (1969). Peanut response to uniform and non-uniform soil salinity. Agronomy Journal 61:384-387.
  19. Sibole, J.V, Cabot, C., Poschenrieder, C. and Barcelo, J. (2003). Efficient leaf ion partitioning, an overriding condition for abscisic acid-controlled stomatal and leaf growth responses to NaCl salinization in two legumes. J. Exp. Bot. 54:2111-2119.
  20. Vadez, V., Srivastava N., Krishnamurthy, L. Aruna, R, and Nigam, S. N. (2005). Standardization of a protocol to screen for salinity tolerance in groundnut. IAN, 25:42-47.
  21. Very, A.A., Robinson, M.F., Mansfield, T.A. and Sanders, A. (1998). Guard cells cation channels are involved in Na+- induced stomatal closure in halophyte. Plant J. 14: 509-521.
  22. Yamme, K., Rahman, M.S. Kawasaki, M. Taniguchi, M. and Miyaqke, H. (2004). Pretreatment with antioxidants decreases the effects of salt stress on chloroplast ultra structure in rice leaf segments (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Prod. Sci. 7: 292-300.
  23. Zhu, J.K. (2003). Regulation of ion homeostasis under salt stress. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 6:441–445.

Editorial Board

View all (0)