Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.391

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Legume Research, volume 34 issue 4 (december 2011) : 288 - 291

GENOTYPE X ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION FOR GRAIN YIELD AND ITS COMPONENTS IN REDGRAM [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp]

D. Kodanda Rami Reddy, O. Venkateswarlu, M.C. Obaiah, G.L. Siva Jyothi
1Agricultural Research Station, Podalakuru - 524 345, India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Reddy Rami Kodanda D., Venkateswarlu O., Obaiah M.C., Jyothi Siva G.L. (2024). GENOTYPE X ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION FOR GRAIN YIELD AND ITS COMPONENTS IN REDGRAM [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp]. Legume Research. 34(4): 288 - 291. doi: .

ABSTRACT

Ten redgram genotypes were evaluated for their yield performance during three years (2007-2010) under rainfed conditions. The experiment was laidout in randomized block design with three replications.  Significant genotypic differences for yield and yield components characters were observed.  Significant genotype-environment interaction indicated differential responses of the genotypes to the environmental changes. The stability analysis was carried out, which showed significant linear component of variation for all the traits including yield.  The genotype LRG 41 was most stable which showed higher grain yield, number of pods/plant and 100-seed weight, whereas PRG 158 was found stable for number of branches/plant and ICPL 85063 for plant height.

REFERENCES

  1. Eberhart, S. A. and Russel, W. A. (1966). Stability parameters for comparing
  2. varieties. Crop Sci., 6: 36 – 40.
  3. Kachanur, P. H.; Tembhurne, B. V. and Amaregouda Patil. (2008). Stability analysis
  4. for yield and yield contributing traits in early pigeonpea under irrigated
  5. condition. Legume Res. 31:4 276 - 279.
  6. Mahto, R. N.; Yadava, M. S. and Mohan, K. M.(2005). G x E interaction in pigeonpea
  7. under rainfed condition. Indian J. Dryland Agric. Res. and Development. 20 : 2 110 - 113.
  8. Patel, M.P.; Tikka, S.B.S.; Prajapati, B.H. and Patel, G.S.(2005). Stability analysis for seed yield of pigeonpea parents and their hybrids. Indian J. Pulses Res. 18 : 2 158 – 160.
  9. Patel, P.T.; Chauhan, R. M.; Parmar ,L.D. and Tikka, S.B.S. (2009). Phenotypic
  10. stability of yield related traits in pigeonpea. Legume Res. 32 : 4 235 – 239.
  11. Phad, D. S.; Madrap, I. A. and Dalvi, V. A. (2005). Studies on G x E interaction and
  12. stability in pigeonpea. Indian J. Pulses Res. 18 : 2 156 – 167.
  13. Rao, Y. K.; Reddy, M. V. and Rao, C. M.(2007). Stability for seed yield in pigeonpea.
  14. J. Food Legume. 20 : 2 207 - 208.
  15. Thanki, H. P.; Pithia, M. S. and Mehta, D. R.(2007). Stability analysis for seed yield
  16. and its components in pigeonpea. National J. Pl. Imp. 9 : 2 103 – 105.
Reviewed By

Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)