Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.391

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2023)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Legume Research, volume 34 issue 3 (september 2011) : 166 - 171


M.M.A. Mondal*, M.A. Rahman1, M.B. Akter, M.S.A. Fakir2
1Crop Physiology Division Bangladesh Institute of Nuclear Agriculture (BINA), Mymensingh, Bangladesh
  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Mondal* M.M.A., Rahman1 M.A., Akter M.B., Fakir2 M.S.A. (2024). EFFECT OF FOLIAR APPLICATION OF NITROGEN AND MICRONUTRIENTS ON GROWTH AND YIELD IN MUNGBEAN. Legume Research. 34(3): 166 - 171. doi: .
Nitrogen (N) in the form of urea (1.5% w/v) was prayed on the canopy of pot grown plants alone and with micronutrients (0.1% w/v of B, Mo, Zn, Ca and Fe) at reproductive stage to investigate their effect on morphological, growth and yield attributes in two mungbean genotypes, one bold (MB-16) and another small seeded (MB-35).  Foliar application of N or N plus micronutrients increased leaf area, specific leaf weight, chlorophyll content, total dry mass, flower number and reproductive efficiency, yield attributes and yield over the control. This increment appeared to be the highest in N plus micronutrients treatment although did not differ from the foliar application of only N. Foliar application of N and N plus micronutrients had no significant influence on harvest index and grain protein content but had significant influence on yield attributes and yield. The effects were much more pronounced in bold seeded genotype, MB-16 compared to small seeded genotype, MB-35. Results suggest that foliar application of N and micronutrients at reproductive stage appears effective in improving mungbean seed yield.
  1. Atkins, C. (1994). In: Mechanisms of Plant Growth and Improved Productivity-Modern Approaches (Basra, A. S. eds). Marcel Dekker Inc., New York. pp. 73-108.
  2. Atkins, C. and Pigeaire, A. (1993). Aust. J. Agric. Res., 44: 1799-1819.
  3. Colvin, T. S. et al. (1995). In: Site-specific Management for Agricultural Systems (Robert, P. C. eds). ASA, CSSA and SSSA, Madison, USA. pp. 3-14.
  4. Crafts-Brandner, S. J. (1992). Crop Sci., 32: 420-424.
  5. Garcia, R. L. and Hanway, J. J. (1976). Agron. J., 68: 653-657.
  6. Hallock, D. L. (1978). Agron. J., 70: 685-688.
  7. Haq, M.U. and Mallarino, A. P. (2000). Agron. J., 92: 16-24.
  8. Imsande, J and Edwards, D. G. (1988). Agron. J., 80: 789-793.
  9. Kumudini, S. et al. (2002). Crop Sci., 42: 141-145.
  10. Maekawa, T. and Kokubun, M. (2005). Plant Prod. Sci., 8: 419-426.
  11. Mitra, R. et al. (1989). Proc. 2nd Intl. Mungbean Symp., Asian Vegetable Research and Development Centre, Taipei, Taiwan. pp. 244-251.
  12. Mondal, M. M. A. (2007). Ph.D Thesis, Dept. Crop Bot., Bangladesh Agric. Univ., Mymensingh.
  13. Nishioka, H. and Okumura, T. (2008). Plant Prod. Sci., 11: 507-513.
  14. Porter, N. G. (1982). Australian J. Agric. Res., 33: 957-965.
  15. Reinbott, T. M. and Blevins, D. G. (1995). J. Plant Nutr., 18: 179-200.
  16. Sconbeck, M. W. et al. (1986). Crop Sci., 26: 783-788.
  17. Sesay, A. and Shibles, R. (1980). Ann. Bot., 45: 47-55.
  18. Shiraiwa, T. and Sinclair, T. R. (1993). Crop Sci., 33: 804-808.
  19. Spaeth, S. C. and Sinclair, T. R. (1983). Field Crop Res., 7: 1-12.
  20. Vasilas, B. L. et al. (1980). Agron. J., 72: 271-275.
  21. Watanabe, I. et al. (1983). Jpn J. Crop Sci., 52: 291-298.
  22. Yoshida, S. et al. (1976). Laboratory Manual for Physiological Studies of Rice. 3rd ed., IRRI, Los Banos, Philippines.

Editorial Board

View all (0)