Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.391

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Legume Research, volume 35 issue 4 (december 2012) : 332 - 336

SEED YIELD OF MUNGBEAN UNDER LATE SEEDING: EFFECT OF PHENOLOGICAL DAYS AND DRY MATTER DISTRIBUTION.

Vijaylaxmi
1Division of Physiology, Biochemistry and Microbiology Indian Institute of Pulses Research Kanpur – 208 024, India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Vijaylaxmi (2024). SEED YIELD OF MUNGBEAN UNDER LATE SEEDING: EFFECT OF PHENOLOGICAL DAYS AND DRY MATTER DISTRIBUTION.. Legume Research. 35(4): 332 - 336. doi: .

ABSTRACT

In order to ascertain the effect of phenology and dry matter distribution in different plant parts on seed yield of mungbean under late seeding condition, sixteen mungbean genotypes were planted  during 2nd week of September and phemology dry matter buildup and its distribution amongst plant parts were studied. With correlation and path analysis it was concluded that mungbean yield under late seeding condition is highly influenced by seed filling period and dry matter allocation in leaves during flowering as well at maturity.

REFERENCES

  1. Berhe, A. (1998). On-farm evaluation of some agronomic factors affecting productivity of faba bean in Selalie zone. FABIS Newsletter, 41: 13-17.
  2. Bhattacharya, A. (1996). Influence of dry matter accumulation and their rates during pre and post flowering phases in various plant parts on mungbean seed yield. Legume Research, 19 (3): 179-184.
  3. Bhattacharya, A. (2000). Urdbean seed yield: Effect of physiological traits at different growth stages. Indian Journal of Pulses Research, 13 (2): 50-55.
  4. Bhattacharya, A. and Sharma, D.K. (2001). Flower drop in pigeonpea: Effect of physiological traits under normal and late seeding. Legume Research, 24 : 231-237.
  5. Board, J.E. and Harville, B.G. (1998). Late planted soybean yield response to reproductive source/sink stress. Crop Science, 38: 763-771.
  6. Deey, D.R. and Lu, K.H. (1959). A correlation and path coefficient analysis of components of crested wheat grass seed production. Agronomy Journal, 51: 515-519.
  7. Ganguly, S.B. and Bhattacharya, A. (2001). Effect of physiological traits on chickpea yield under normal and late seeding. Legume Research, 24 : 6 – 10.
  8. Hoeft, R.G., Nafziger, E.D. Johnson, R.R and Aldrich, S.R. (2000). Modern corn and soybean production. Edit. L.J., Champaign, MCSP Publication.
  9. Kantolic, A.G. and Slafer, G.A. ((2001). Photoperiod sensitivity after flowering and seed number determination in indeterminate soybean cultivars. Field Crop Research, 72: 109-118.
  10. Khalil, S.A., Wahab, A., Rehman, A., Muhammad, F., Wahab, S., Khan, A.Z., Zubair, M., Shah, M.K. and Amin, R. (2010). Density and planting date influence phonological development assimilate partitioning and dry matter production of faba bean. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 42 (6): 3831-3838.
  11. Kurmawanshi, S.M., Kewat, M.L., Ramgiri, S.R. and Sharma, R.S. (1994). Evaluation of some agronomic practices for successful cultivation of faba bean (Vicia faba L.). Indian Journal of Agronomy, 39 (4): 588-591.
  12. McDonald, G.K., Adisarwanto, T. and Knight, R. (1994). Effect of time of sowing on flowering in faba bean (Vicia faba L.). Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 46: 1465-1472.
  13. Naeve, S.L., Potter, B.D., Quiring, S.R., O’Neil, T.A. and Kurle, J.E. (2004). Influence of soybean plant population and row spacing on development and yield across planting dates in Minnesota. Available at www.soybean.umn.edu/pdfs/2004asposter_1_spacing_planting_screen.odf. Univ. of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
  14. Panwar, G. and Sharma, B.B. (2004). Effect of planting date, seed rate and row spacing on yield and yield attributes of bold seeded mungbean during spring/summer season.
  15. Indian Journal of Pulses Research, 17 (1): 45-46.
  16. Rajender, K., Singh, R.C. and Kumar, R. (1993). Effect of sowing time and planting density on growth and productivity of faba bean (Vicia faba L.) genotypes. Haryana Agricultural University Journal of Research. 23 (1): 43-46.
  17. Ravi, C. K. (1984). Physiological studies on flower and pod development in greengram (Vigna radiate (L.) Wilczek). M. Sc. (Agri) Thesis, University of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore.
  18. Sinha, S.K. amd Khanna, R. (1975). Physiological, biochemical and genetically basis of heterosis. Advances in Agronomy, 27: 123-174.
  19. Sliman, Z.T. (1993). Response of faba bean (Vicia faba L.) to seeding dates in central region of Saudi Arabia. J. of King Saud University, Agricultural Sciences, 5 : 219-226.
  20. Snedecor,G.W. and Cocharan, W.G. (1978). In “Statistical Methods”, Oxford and IBH Publishing Co. Calcutta, 6th Edition.
  21. Summerfield, R.J.S., Minchin, F.R., Roberts, E.H. and Hadley, P. (1980). Effect of photoperiod and air temperature on growth and yield of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). In “Proceedings of International Workshop on Chickpea Improvement, 1979” International Crop Research Institute for Semi Arid Tropics, pp. 121-149.
  22. Vijay laxmi and Bhattacharya, A. (2006). Mungbean seed yield: I Effect of dry matter distribution and temperature at different crop growth stages. Indian Journal of Agriculture Research, 41 : 23-28.
  23. Zhang, Q.Y., Gao, Q., Herbert, S.J., Li, Y.S. and Hashemi, A.M. (2010). Influence of sowing date on phonological stages, seed growth and marketable yield of four vegetable soybean cultivars in North-eastern USA. African J. Agricu. Res. 5 : 2556-2562.
Reviewed By

Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)