Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.391

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Legume Research, volume 35 issue 4 (december 2012) : 327 - 331

STABILITY ANALYSIS FOR SEED YIELD AND THEIR COMPONENT TRAITS IN BREEDING LINES OF GUAR (CYAMOPSIS TETRAGONOLOBA L.)

S.K. Jain*, P.R. Patel1
1Sorghum Research Station, S. D. Agricultural University, Deesa, Banaskanta, – 385 535, india

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Jain* S.K., Patel1 P.R. (2024). STABILITY ANALYSIS FOR SEED YIELD AND THEIR COMPONENT TRAITS IN BREEDING LINES OF GUAR (CYAMOPSIS TETRAGONOLOBA L.). Legume Research. 35(4): 327 - 331. doi: .

ABSTRACT

Seed yield performances and stability indices were calculated for thirteen genotypes of cluster bean evaluated for two years (2008-09 and 2009-10) at two locations in North Gujarat to identify phenotypically stable genotypes for seed yield and its component traits. Pooled analysis of variance for stability in the performance of different genotypes of guar were highly significant for all the characters viz., days to 50%  flowering, days to 75% maturity, pods per plant, plant height, and seed yield except  pod length and  seeds per pod. The G X E interaction for all the characters were significant and the significant mean square due to environment (linear) indicated the existence of the real genotypic differences in the characters for regression over the environmental mean. The genotypes namely GAUG-0309, GAUG-0416, GAUG-0513 and GAUG-0522 were found stable for earliness and they can be directly used for breeding for earliness. For improvement of seed yield, the genotypes viz., GAUG-0309 and GAUG-0511 were the most stable under rainfed situation.

REFERENCES

  1. Dalmeida A. and Tikka S. B. S. (2003). Stability of yield and quality traits in guar. In: Advances in Arid Legumes Research, (Henry, A., Kumar, D. and Singh, N. B. Eds), Scientific Publisher, India, PP 367-371.
  2. Eberhart S. and Russel W. A. (1966). Stability Parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Sci., 6: 36- 40.
  3. Raje R. S. and Rao S. K. (2004). Stability analysis for seed yield in mungbean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek). Legume Res., 27: 11-18.
  4. Saleem M., Sadiq M. S., Sarwar G. and Abbas G. (2002). Performance of elite mungbean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek) germplasm in multilocational experiments. Biologia, 48: 9-13.
  5. Singh K. B. and Bejiga G. (1990). Analysis of stability for some characters in kabuli chickpea. Euphytica, 49: 223-227.
  6. Singh J. V., Paroda R. S., Arora R. N. and Saini M. L. (1991). Stability analysis for green and dry fodder yield in clusterbean. Indian J. Genet., 51: 213-217.
  7. Stafford R. E. (1982). Yield Stability of Guar Breeding Lines and Cultivars. Crop Sci., 22: 1009-1011.
  8. Swamy A. A. and Reddy G. L. K. (2004). Stability analysis of yield in mungbean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek). Legume Res., 27: 107-110.
  9. Vaughan J. G. and Geissler C. A. (1998). Food Plants. Oxford University Press. Great Claredon Street, Oxford, New york, PP 1-550.
Reviewed By

Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)