Article Id: ARCC513 | Page : 78 - 80
Citation :- IDENTIFICATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF GREEN GRAM [Vigna radiata (L.) R. Wilczek.] PHOTOSENSITIVE LINES AND THEIR SIGNIFICANCE.Legume Research-An International Journal.2012.(35):78 - 80
N. Sunil, K.S. Varaprasad1, N. Sivaraj, Babu Abraham and Vinod Kumar2
Address : National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, Regional Station, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad-500 030, India


One hundred and forty four accessions of green gram germplasm collected from middle Eastern Ghats were characterized and evaluated for 22 qualitative and quantitative traits during post rainy season of 2006-07 and rainy season of 2007. Three accessions (IC546478, IC546486 and IC369703) exhibited primitive characters such as photosensitivity, spreading growth habit and slight twining tendency, which differed significantly in comparison with the released varieties. Accession IC369703 was found promising for the quantitative traits viz. plant height (21.2 cm), primary branches (4.2) and pod clusters per plant (10.2) as against released varieties values ranging from 27-31.6cm, 1.4-2.4, 7.8-9.4 respectively. Based on the present study and previously reported archaeological evidences, it is proposed that green gram could have its origin in the cusp region of inner Western Ghats and inner Eastern Ghats.


Green gram Photosensitivity Origin Germplasm.


  1. Arora, R.K. and Nayar, E.R. (1984). The Wild Relatives of Crop Plants in India. National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, New Delhi, India. 90p.
  2. Bailey, L.H. (1970). Manual of Cultivated Plants. (Rev.) MacMillan, New York. 1116p.
  3. Bhupinder, S. and Verma, M.M. (1987). Introduction and genetic improvement of rice bean (Vigna umbellata) as a new pulse crop. In Abstracts. First Symposium on Crop Improvement (Eds. Gill, K.S., Khehra, A.S., Verma, M.M., Bains, K.S.) 23-27 February.
  4. Carberry,P.S, Ranganathan, R. Reddy, L.J. Chauhan, Y.S. and Robertson, M.J. (2001). Predicting growth and development of pigeonpea: flowering response to photoperiod. Field Crops Res. 69:151-162.
  5. Chandel, K.P.S. (1984). Role of wild Vigna species in the evaluation and improvement of mung [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] and urd bean [V. mungo (L.) Hepper]. Annals Agric. Res. 5:99-11.
  6. Fuller, D.Q. and Harvey, E.L. (2006). The archaebotany of Indian pulses: identification, processing and evidence for cultivation. Environ. Archaeol. 11:219-246.
  7. accessed in May, 2010.
  8. Jain, H.K and Mehra, K.L. (1980). Evolution, adaptation, relationships, and uses of the species of Vigna cultivated in India. In Advances in Legume Science, 459-468 (Eds. Summerfield, R.J. and Bunting, A.H.) HMSO London.
  9. Kawalker, T.G. Bisht, I.S. Mahajan, R.K. Patel, D.P Gupta, P.N and Chandel, K.P.S. (1996). Catalogue on Green Gram (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek) NBPGR, New Delhi.130p.
  10. Paroda, R.S. and Arora, R.K. (1991). Plant Genetic Resources: General Perspective - In. Plant Genetic Resources Conservation and Management Concepts and Approaches, (Eds Paroda, R.S and Arora, R.K. http : // www / publications /Web_version /174 / begin.htm#Contens.
  11. Singh, T.P. (1974). Epistatic bias and gene action for protein content in greengram (Phaseolus aureus Roxb.). Euphytica 23:459-465.
  12. Singh, H.B. Joshi, B.S. Chandel, K.P.S. Pant, K.C. and Saxena, R.K. (1974). Genetic diversity in some Asiatic Phaseolus species and its conservation. Indian J. Genet. Plant Breed. 34(A):52-57.
  13. Srivastava, U. Mahajan, R.K. Gangopadhyay, K.K. Singh, M. and Dhillon, B.S. (2001). Minimal descriptors of agri-horticultural crops (part I ). NBPGR, New Delhi, India.
  14. Sunil, N. Sivaraj, N. and Chakrabarty, S.K. (2003). Characterization and evaluation of mungbean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczeck) germplasm from Andhra Pradesh, India. Indian J. Plant Genet. Resour. 16(1):18-22.
  15. Vavilov, N.I. (1926). Studies on the Origin of Cultivated Plants. Leningrad. 248p.
  16. Verma, S.N.P. (1971). Inheritance of photosensitivity in mungbean (Phaseolusaureus Roxb.). Mysore J. Agric. Sci. 5:477-480.

Global Footprints