Banner

Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.32, CiteScore: 0.906

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Legume Research, volume 35 issue 1 (march 2012) : 56-58

GENOTYPE X ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION AND STABILITY ANALYSIS FOR GRAIN YIELD IN BLACKGRAM (VIGNA MUNGO L.)

S.B. Revanappa*, P.Y. Kamannavar, A.G. Vijaykumar, M. Ganajaxi, D.K. Gajanan, B. Arunkumar, P.M. Salimath
1AICRP on MULLaRP, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad-580 005, India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Revanappa* S.B., Kamannavar P.Y., Vijaykumar A.G., Ganajaxi M., Gajanan D.K., Arunkumar B., Salimath P.M. (2025). GENOTYPE X ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION AND STABILITY ANALYSIS FOR GRAIN YIELD IN BLACKGRAM (VIGNA MUNGO L.). Legume Research. 35(1): 56-58. doi: .

ABSTRACT

Eleven genotypes of blackgram were tested at three locations viz. Dharwad, Bidar and Gulbarga that represented different agro-climatic conditions of North-Karnataka during kharif 2009 to study their yield stability. Pooled analysis of variance and stability analysis were performed. The genotype (G) x environment (E) interaction and both variance due to genotypes and environments were significant. The partitioning of G x E interaction into linear and non-linear components indicated that both predictable and unpredictable components shared the interaction. On the basis of stability parameters, the top yielding genotypes, K-7-7 (1050 kg/ha) and DU-1 (1024 kg/ha) exhibited the stable performance over the locations. Results also revealed that the genotypes; BDU-3-3, T-9 and DU-3 also gave higher yield. But their performance was unpredictable due to high deviation from regression.

REFERENCES

  1. Armugam, P.M. Anandhi, K., & Selvi, B. (2010). Stability analysis of yield in blackgram. Legume Res. 33:70-71.
  2. Campbell, B.T., and Jones, M.A. (2005). Assessment of genotype x environment interactions for yield and fibre quality in cotton performance trials. Euphytica. 144:69-78.
  3. Eberhart, S.A. and Russell, W.A. (1966). Stability parameter for comparing varieties. Crop Sci. 6:36-40.
  4. Finlay, K.W. and G.N. Wilkinson. (1963). The analysis of adaptation in a plant breeding programme. Australian J. Agric. Res. 14:742-754.
  5. Manivannan, N. Ramasamy, A and Natarajan, N. (1998). Phenotypic stability analysis in greengram. Indian J. Agric. Sci. 68:31-32.
  6. Natarajan, C. (2001). Stability of yield and its components in blackgram. Madras Agric. J. 88:409-413.
  7. Patela, J.D. Naika, M.R. Chaudhari, S.B. Vaghelaa, K.O. and Kodappully, V.C. (2009). Stability analysis for seed yield in greengram (Vigna radiate L. Wilczek). Agric. Sci. Digest. 29:24-27.
  8. Rao, S.K. and Suryawanshi. (1988). Genotype x Environment interaction in the genetic diversity of urad germplasm collections. Legume Res. 11:15-20.
  9. Singh, B., Patra, G.J. and Samalo, B.N. (1994). Genotype X environment interaction in blackgram (Phaseolus mungo L.). Indian J. Agric. Sci. 64:1870-1871.
  10. Westerman, J.M. (1971). Genotype x environment interaction and developmental regulation in Arabidopsis thaliana II. Inbred lines analysis. Heredity. 26:93-106.
Reviewed By

Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)