Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.391

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Legume Research, volume 35 issue 1 (march 2012) : 1 - 7

GENETIC VARIABILITY FOR CHICKPEA (Cicer arietinum L.) UNDER LATE SOWN SEASON

Anita Babbar, Vijay Prakash, Prakash Tiwari, M.A. Iquebal*
1Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, J.N. Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, Jabalpur-482 004, India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Babbar Anita, Prakash Vijay, Tiwari Prakash, Iquebal* M.A. (2024). GENETIC VARIABILITY FOR CHICKPEA (Cicer arietinum L.) UNDER LATE SOWN SEASON. Legume Research. 35(1): 1 - 7. doi: .

ABSTRACT

Forty four promising lines of chickpea were grown in RBD with three replications under late sown season. The maximum genotypic coefficient of variation was noticed for damaged pod percentage, total number of seeds per plant and total number of pods per plant. Days to 50% flowering, days to maturity, plant height, 100 seed weight and seed yield per plant showing high heritability coupled with medium genetic advance as percentage of mean, whereas, damage pod percentage, number of seeds per plant and number of pods per plant showing medium heritability and high genetic advance as percentage of mean. Seed yield per plant showed high significant positive correlation with total number of seeds per plant , total number of pods per plant, biological yield, plant height and 100 seed weight, whereas, significant negative correlation with days to 50% flowering and damaged pod percentage. Based on D2 cluster analysis, the forty four genotypes were grouped into nine clusters, depending upon the genetic constitution of the genotypes. The maximum intra cluster distance was found in cluster IV followed by cluster I, cluster VI and cluster VIII. Inter cluster values varied from 2.75 to 9.02. Total pods per plant, 100 seed weight, days to maturity, biological yield and seed yield per plant considered as selection criteria, while selecting superior genotypes under late condition. High yielding advanced breeding lines viz. JG 14, JSC 56, AKG 70, JG 9602974, BG 3005, PG 03110, Phule G 00108 were found suitable under late sown condition.

REFERENCES

  1. Ali, Q., Ahsan, M., Khaliq, I., Elahi, M., Shahbaz, M., Ahmed, W. and Naees, M. (2011). Estimation of genetic association of yield and quality traits in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Int. Res. J. Plant Sci., 2(6):166-169.
  2. Alwani H., Moulla, M. and Chouhan, W. (2010). Genotype environment interaction and genetic parameter in Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Landraces. J. Agril. Sci., 2(1):153-157.
  3. Arora, P.P. and Jeena, A.S. (2001). Genetic variability studies in chickpea. Legume Res., 24(2):137-138.
  4. Babbar, A. and Patel, S.K. (2005). Correlation and path analysis in desi chickpea under Kymore Plateau Zone of Madhya Pradesh. J.N.K.V.V. Res. J., 39(1):47-51.
  5. Bicer, B.T. (2009). The effect of seed size on the yield and yield components of chickpea and lentil. Afr. J. Biotechnol., 8(8):1482-1487.
  6. Dwivedi, K.K. and Gaibriyal, M.L. (2009). Assessment of genetic diversity of cultivated chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Asian J. Agril. Sci., 1(1):7-8.
  7. Hahid S., Malik R., Bakhsh A., Asif M. A., Iqbal U. and Iqbal S.M. (2010). Assessment of genetic variability and interrelationship among some agronomic traits in chickpea. Int. J. Agril boil., 12(1):81-85.
  8. Jeena A.S., Arora P.P. and Ojha O.P. (2005). Variability and correlation studies for yield and its components in chickpea. Legume Res., 28(2):146-148.
  9. Jeena, A.S. and Arora, P.P. (2001). Role of variability for improvement in chickpea. Legume Res., 24(2):135-136.
  10. Kumar, S., Arora, P.P. and Jeena, A.S. (2001). Genetic variability studies for quantitative traits in chickpea. Agril. Sci. Dig., 21(4):263-264.
  11. Meena H.S., Kumar, J. and Deshmukh, P.S. (2006). Genetic variability and correlation studies for traits related to drought tolerance in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Indian J. Genet. Pl. Br., 66(2):140.
  12. Pratap, A., Basandrai, D. and Sood, B.C. (2004). Variability and heritability studies in early maturating chickpea genotypes. Indian J. Pul. Res., 17(2):177-1788.
  13. Sandhu, J.S., Singh, P. and Singh, A. (2006). Genetic divergence in chickpea in different environments. Trop. Sci., 46(1):23-30.
  14. Sial, P., Mishra, P.K., Pathak, R.K. and Sial, M. (2003). Character association in chickpea. Environ. Ecol.,
  15. 21(3):675-679.
  16. Singh, L. and Singh, J.D. (2002). Contribution of different characters towards seed yield in chickpea. Ann. Biol., 18(2):129-132.
  17. Singh, N.P., Ram, K. and Kumar, R. (2001). An assay of effects of different traits on chickpea grain yield. Ann. Agri. Res., 22(4):564-569.
  18. Sreelakshmi D., Shivani C.V. and Kumar S. (2010). Genetic divergence variability and character association studies in bengal gram (Cicer arietinum L.). Electronic J. Pl. Br., 1(5):1339-1343.
  19. Talebi, R, Fayaz, F and Jelodar N.A.B. (2007). Correlation and path coefficient analysis of yield and yield components of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under dry land condition in the west of Iran. Asian J. Pl. Sci., 6(7):1151-1154.
  20. Yadav, N.P. and Haquae, M.F. (2001). Correlation and regression study of seed yield and its components in chickpea. J. Res. B. Agril. Uni., 11(4):211-215.
Reviewed By

Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)