Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.391

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Legume Research, volume 28 issue 4 (december 2005) : 297 - 299

CORRELATION AND PATH ANALYSIS IN F2 GENERATION OF URDBEAN {VIGNA MUNGO (L.) HEPPER}

A. Srividhya·, M. Reddy Sekhar, G.L.K. Reddy
1Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding. S.v. Agricultural College. Tirupati - 517 502. India
  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Srividhya· A., Sekhar Reddy M., Reddy G.L.K. (2024). CORRELATION AND PATH ANALYSIS IN F2 GENERATION OF URDBEAN {VIGNA MUNGO (L.) HEPPER}. Legume Research. 28(4): 297 - 299. doi: .
Correlation and path analysis of 15 F2 crosses derived from 6 × 6 diallel cross in urdbean revealed that seed yield/plant was positively and significantly associated with pods/plant, clusters/plant, seeds/pod, 100-seed weight and biomass. Pods/plant exerted the highest direct effect on seed yield followed by seeds/pod. The selection criteria based on pods/plant, clusters/plant, seeds/pod, 100-seed weight, days to maturity and plant height will give fruitful results for yield improvement in urdbean.
    1. Dewey. D.R. and Lu. K .H. (1959). Agron. J., 51: 515-518.
    2. Johnson. HW. et a/. (1995). Agron. J.• 47: 477- 483.
    3. Kingshlin. M. and Vanniyarasan. C. (2000). Crop Res., 19: 102-105
    4. Patil. H.S. and Deshmukh. R.B. (1989). J. Maharastra Agric. Universities, 112: 289-292.
    5. Pooranchand (1999). Crop Res.. 18: 78-83.
    6. Rajendrakumar. A. eta/. (1990). Ann. Agric. Res.. 20: 468-471.
    7. Shanmugasundaram. P. and Sreerangaswamy. S.R. (1995). Madras Agric. J .. 82: 125-129.

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)