Banner

Chief Editor:
J. S. Sandhu
Vice Chancellor, SKN Agriculture, University, Jobner, VC, NDUAT, Faizabad, Deputy Director General (Crop Science), Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR), New Delhi
Frequency:Monthly
Indexing:
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Go...
Legume Research, volume 29 issue 4 (december 2006) : 291 - 293

COMPONENTS OF GENETIC VARIATION IN BIPARENTAL PROGENIES OF BLACKGRAM {VIGNA MUNGO (L.) HEPPER}

A. Srividhya*, M. Reddy Sekhar, G.L.K. Reddy, K.S. Reddy
1Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, S.v. Agricultural College, Tirupati - 517502, India
  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Srividhya* A., Sekhar Reddy M., Reddy G.L.K., Reddy K.S. (2025). COMPONENTS OF GENETIC VARIATION IN BIPARENTAL PROGENIES OF BLACKGRAM {VIGNA MUNGO (L.) HEPPER}. Legume Research. 29(4): 291 - 293. doi: .
A field experiment was conducted to estimate the components of genetic variance, heritability and genetic advance as per cent of mean for yield and related traits in the cross K-4686 × HPU-7 using North Carolina Design-III. The dominance variance (σD2) was high for plant height, pods/plant, days to maturity and clusters/plant while the same estimates attained a lower value for days to 50% flowering, seed yield, biomass, pods/cluster, 100-seed weight, seeds/pod and pod length indicating the preponderance of additive gene action in their inheritance. The heritability in broad sense was high for pod length followed by clusters/plant.
    1. Bhaliya, V.J. et al. (1986). Indian J. Agric. ScL, 56: 878-880.
    2. Comstock. R.E. and Robinson, H.F. (1948). Biometrics, 4: 254-266
    3. Gill, K.S. et aJ. (1987). Proc. First Symp. Crop Improv. Vol. 1. Crop Improvement Society of India
    4. Kingshlin. M. and Subbaraman. N. (1999). Legume Res., 22: 113-116.
    5. Nanda. G.S. et al. (1990). Indian J. Genet., 50: 210-215.
    6. Pooran Chand (2000). Legume Res., 23: 180-182

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)