Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu
Print ISSN 0250-5371
Online ISSN 0976-0571
NAAS Rating 6.80
SJR 0.391
Impact Factor 0.8 (2024)

Frequency :

Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)

Indexing Services :

BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus

Submit

Legume Research, volume 28 issue 2 (june 2005) : 122 - 124

RESPONSE OF WEED MANAGEMENT PRACfICES ON THE GROWTH AND YIELD OF URDBEAN {VIGNA MUNGO L. HEPPER}

R. Raman, G. Kuppuswamy, R. Krishnamoorthy

Affiliations

¹Department of Agronomy, Annamalai University, Annamalainagar - 608 002, India

Submitted|
First Online |
doi

Cite article:- Raman R., Kuppuswamy G., Krishnamoorthy R. (2024). RESPONSE OF WEED MANAGEMENT PRACfICES ON THE GROWTH AND YIELD OF URDBEAN {VIGNA MUNGO L. HEPPER}. Legume Research. 28(2): 122 - 124. doi: .

ABSTRACT

A field Investigation was carried out to evaluate the effect of hand weedings and herbicides on the weed flora, growth and yield of urdbean (Vigna mungo). The experiment was conducted in a randomised block design replicated four times with seven treatments viz., weedy check, one hand weeding on 20 DAS, two hand weedings on 20 and 40 DAS, f1uchloralin and pendimethalin each @ 0.5 and 1.0 kg/ha. All the weed control treatments significantly increased the growth and yield components and final yield of urdbean, attributable to reduced weed competition for nutrients, moisture, light and space. In respect of weed biomass and weed count, weedy check treatment recorded the highest value and twice hand weeding on 20 and 40 DAS gave the least value, followed by pendimethalin @ 1.0 kg/ha.

KEYWORDS

REFERENCES

Bayan, H.C. and Gogoi, S. (1998). Ann. Agric. BioI. Res., 3: 167-171.
Gupta, Y.K. et al. (1990). Indian J. Weed Sci., 22(3 and 4): 38-42.
Misra, A. and Tosh, G.C. ( 1979). J. Res. Orissa Univ. Agric. Tech., 10: 1-6.
Mohamed Ali, A. and Durai, R. (1987). Indian J. Weed Sci., 19: 52-56,
Panwar, R.S. et al. (1985). Annual ConI. Indian Soc. Weed Sci. held at Varanasi, p-53.
Ramanathan, S.P. and Chandrashekharan, B. (1998). Indian J. Agron., 43: 318-320.
Vats, D.P. and Sidhu, M.S. (1976). Indian J. Weed Sci., 8: 64-69.
Yadav, S.K. et al. (1985). Weed Abstr., 34: 836.

Disclaimer :

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Copyright :

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reviewed By

Share options

Editorial Board

View all (0)

RESPONSE OF WEED MANAGEMENT PRACfICES ON THE GROWTH AND YIELD OF URDBEAN {VIGNA MUNGO L. HEPPER}

ABSTRACT

KEYWORDS

REFERENCES

Reviewed By

In this Article

APC

Publish With US

Become a Reviewer/Member

Open Access

Products and Services

Support and Policies

Editorial Board