Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu
Print ISSN 0250-5371
Online ISSN 0976-0571
NAAS Rating 6.80
SJR 0.391
Impact Factor 0.8 (2024)

Frequency :

Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)

Indexing Services :

BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus

Submit

Legume Research, volume 28 issue 2 (june 2005) : 115 - 118

COMPARISON OF MORPHOGENIC ABIUfY OF CALLUS TYPES INDUCED FROM DIFFERENT EXPLANTS OF SOYBEAN (GLYCINE MAXL. MERRILL)

S. Tiwari, M.K. Tripathi

Affiliations

¹Plant Biotechnology Laboratory, Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, J. N. Agricultural University Jabal;'Ur - 482 004, India

Submitted|
First Online |
doi

Cite article:- Tiwari S., Tripathi M.K. (2024). COMPARISON OF MORPHOGENIC ABIUfY OF CALLUS TYPES INDUCED FROM DIFFERENT EXPLANTS OF SOYBEAN (GLYCINE MAXL. MERRILL). Legume Research. 28(2): 115 - 118. doi: .

ABSTRACT

The separate experments were conducted for immature embryonic axes, inunature cotyledon, mature cotyledon, hypocotyl and leaf disc cultures with eleven soybean genotypes. For each explant culture, at least three different fortifications of basal MS medium were used. Various cultured explants initiated mainly four types of calli: a Undifferentiated callus cultures which were cream in colour and soft friable in texture; b. Compact dark green in colour with few or many bead like structures; c. Compact dark green with few or many dark green bead like structures and some times partially covered with a thin layer of white loose callus, and d. Mixture of creamy white and light green calli which was dense and glossy in texture. Culture media played an imperative role in the formation of embryogenic calli. Hypocotyl followed by mature cotyledon proved to be the superior explants for somatic embryogenesis and rpature cotyledons for plantlet regeneration.

KEYWORDS

REFERENCES

Ancelet, M. et a/. (1988). Plant Physiol. Biochem. France, 22: 212.
Gai, J. and Guo, Z. (1996). Soybean. Genet. News/., 23: 58-61.
Henshaw, G.C. et a/. (1982). In: Differentiation in vitro. (Yeoman, M.M. and Truman, D.E.S. eds.). University Press, Cambridge. pp. 231-251.
Murashige, T. and Skoog, F. (1962). Physiol. Plant, 15: 473-497.
Nawracala J. and Konieczny C. (1996). Regeneration of Soybean Plants via Somatic EmbFyogenesis Biuletyn Instytutu Hodowlii Aklimatyzaciji, Roslin. No.19B: 21-29.
Yeh, M.S. (1989). J. Agric. For., 38: 139-149.

Disclaimer :

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Copyright :

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reviewed By

Share options

Editorial Board

View all (0)

COMPARISON OF MORPHOGENIC ABIUfY OF CALLUS TYPES INDUCED FROM DIFFERENT EXPLANTS OF SOYBEAN (GLYCINE MAXL. MERRILL)

ABSTRACT

KEYWORDS

REFERENCES

Reviewed By

In this Article

APC

Publish With US

Become a Reviewer/Member

Open Access

Products and Services

Support and Policies

Editorial Board