Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.391

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Legume Research, volume 28 issue 2 (june 2005) : 87 - 93

DIFFERENTIAL EXPRESSION OF UPOXYGENASE IN GREEN GRAM (VIGNA RADIATA L.)

P. Uma Maheswari Devi*, K. Vijaya Lakshmi, K. Janardhan Reddy·, P. Reddanna2
1Department of Applied Microbiology, Sri Padmavathi Women's University. Tirupati - 517 502. AP.. lndia

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Devi* Maheswari Uma P., Lakshmi Vijaya K., Reddy· Janardhan K., Reddanna2 P. (2024). DIFFERENTIAL EXPRESSION OF UPOXYGENASE IN GREEN GRAM (VIGNA RADIATA L.). Legume Research. 28(2): 87 - 93. doi: .

ABSTRACT

Upoxygenase (LOX) activity was measured in germinating green gram seedlings. The expression of LOX enzyme in different tissues at different stages of development showed a complex pattern of developmental expression with maximum in tissues that are very active metabolically such as young rapidly growing seedlings, flowers and developing seeds. The increased levels of lipoxygenases during seed development suggest that the enzyme may play a physiological role during maturation process.

KEYWORDS

    REFERENCES

    1. Bell and Mullet (1991). Mol. Gen. Genet., 230: 456-462.
    2. Croft, KP.C. et al. (1993). Plant Physiol., 101: 13-24.
    3. Freussner, I. and Kindl, H. (1992). FE.B.5. Lett., 298: 223-225.
    4. Freussner, I. et aJ. (1995). Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., USA, 92: 11849-11853.
    5. Funk, M.O. etal. (1986). Plant Physiol., 82: 1139-11~1.
    6. Grayburn, W.S. et al. (1991). Plant Physiol., 95: 1214-1218.
    7. GUS5, P.L. et al. (1968). Plant Cell PhySiol., 9: 415-422.
    8. Hildebrand, D.F. (1989). Physiol. Plant., 76: 249-253.
    9. Hildebrand, D.E and Hymowitz, T. (1983). Bot. Gaz., 144: 212-216.
    10. Hildebrand, D.F. etal. (1991). Plant Sci., 75: 1-8.
    11. Iwanicki, J.S. (1971). M.S. Thesis, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL. USA
    12. Kato. T et al. (1992). Plant PhysioJ., 98: 324-330.
    13. Kiran Kumar, v.v. (1994). Purification and characterization of Iipoixygenases : effects of selected eicosanoids on
    14. BHK-21 cell line. Ph. D. Thesis, University of Hyderabad, Hyderabad, India.
    15. Lowry. O.H. eta/. (1951). J. BioI. Chern., 193: 265-275.
    16. Mack, AJ. et aJ. (1987). lsozymes: Curro Top. BioI. Med. Res., 13: 127-154.
    17. Matsui, Ketal. (1988). Agri. BioI. Chern., 52: 3219-3221.
    18. Matsui. Ketal. (1992). Plant Sci, 85: 23-32.
    19. Melan, M.A. et a/. (1994). Plant Physiol., 105: 385-393.
    20. Oelze-Karrow, H. et a/. (1970). Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., USA., 65: 51-57.
    21. Ohta, H. et a/. (1986). Plant Cell Physiol., 27: 911-918. Vol. 28, No.2, 2005
    22. Rackis, J.J. eta/. (1972). Cerea/Chem., 49: 586-597.
    23. Reddanna, P. eta/. (1988). Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 157: 1348-1351.
    24. Reddanna, P. eta/. (1990). MethodsEnzymol.,187: 268-277.
    25. Saravitz, D.M. and Siedow, J.N. (1995). Plant Physiol., 107: b35-543.
    26. Siedow. J.N. (1991). Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. BioI., 42: 145-188.
    27. Uma Maheswari Devi, P. et a/. (2000). Euro. J. Plant Patho., 104: 857-865.
    28. Vijayan. P. Shockey eta/. (1998) Prnr N;,t. Ar;ori Sri T/SA qfi· 7~OQ-7214.
    Reviewed By

    Download Article
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)