Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.391

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Legume Research, volume 28 issue 1 (march 2005) : 38 - 41

EFFECT' OF RHIZOBIUMINOCULATION AND VARIOUS SOURCE..') OF NITROGEN ON GROwrn AND YIELD OF COWPEA [VIGNA UNGUICULATA (L.) WALP.]

R.D. Yadav·, C.V.S. Malik
1Department of Agronomy C.C.s., Haryana Agricultural University. Hisa~ - 125004, India
  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Yadav· R.D., Malik C.V.S. (2024). EFFECT' OF RHIZOBIUMINOCULATION AND VARIOUS SOURCE..') OF NITROGEN ON GROwrn AND YIELD OF COWPEA [VIGNA UNGUICULATA (L.) WALP.]. Legume Research. 28(1): 38 - 41. doi: .
Application of organic/inorganic sources of nitrogen @ 20 kg N ha−1 + seed inoculation with Rhizobiwn significantly increased plant height, dry matter accumulation, yield attributes viz. branches per plant, seeds per pod, pods per plant, yield per plant and ultimately seed, stover and total biomass yields per ha over control. Combined application 6f organic/inorganic sources of N + seed inoculation further induced significant increase in all these above mentioned parameters of plant over their individual application. Vermicompost x inoculation produced significantly highest whereas, urea x inoculatipn produced lowest number and dry weight of nodales per plant. Application of vermicompost @ 20 kg N ha−1 was found superior in respect of most of the growth and yield attributes than FYM.
    1. Loepes. A.J. et a/. (1996). Revista-Brasi/eira-de-ciencia-do- 50/0.. 20: 55-62.
    2. Mathur, K. (2000). M.Sc. Thesis, CCSHAU, Hisar.
    3. Mba. C.C. (1996). Resour. Conserv. Recycling., 17: 219-226.
    4. Mishra, S.K. (1999). Ann. Agric. Res., 20: 308-312.
    5. Mishra. S.K. and Baboo, R. (1999). Indian 1. Agron., 44: 373-376.
    6. Rajput, A.L. (1994). Indian J. Agron.. 39: 584-587.
    7. Reddy, R. et a/. (1998). Legume Res., 21: 57-60.
    8. Routray. T.K. et a/. (1996). Madras Agric. J.. 83: 354-356.
    9. Vadavia, AT et a/. (1991). Indian 1. Agron., 36: 263-264.

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)