Banner

Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.32, CiteScore: 0.906

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Legume Research, volume 28 issue 1 (march 2005) : 7 - 11

GENE ACfION AND COMBINING ABILITY ANALYSIS IN SOYBEAN {GLYCINEMAX (L.) MERRILL}

A.P. Agrawal·, P.M. Salimath, S.A. Patil
1Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, University of Agricultural Sciences, DhalWad - 580 005. India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Agrawal· A.P., Salimath P.M., Patil S.A. (2025). GENE ACfION AND COMBINING ABILITY ANALYSIS IN SOYBEAN {GLYCINEMAX (L.) MERRILL}. Legume Research. 28(1): 7 - 11. doi: .

ABSTRACT

Gene action and combining ability analysis was carried out using 5 x 5 diallel set of soybean crosses aloag with the parents. Analysis of six plant and four yield attributing characters revealed that most of plant characters might be governed by additive gene effects, whereas the non-additive and complex of additive and non-additive gene effects played an important role in the expression of yield attributing characters. Bragg and JS-335 were good combiner for desirable plant and yield attributing characters.

KEYWORDS

    REFERENCES

    1. Arunachalam, V. et a/. (1984). Euphytica, 33: 33-39.
    2. Bernard, R.L. (1972). Crop Sci., 12: 235-239.
    3. Chauhan, V.S. (1983). Crop Improv., 10: 40-44.
    4. Cinsoy, A.S. (1992). Anado/u, 2(2): 14'30.
    5. Comstock, R.E. (1960). In: Biometrical Genetics, (Kempthorne, O. ed.) Pergamon Press, London, 234p.
    6. Gadag, R.N. (1985). M.Sc.(Agri.) Thesis, UAS, Bangalore.
    7. Griffing. B. (1956). Aust. J. BioI. Sci., 9: 463-493.
    8. Halvankar, G.B. and Pati!, VP. (1993). J. Maharashtra Agric. Univ., 18: 46-49.
    9. Harer, P.N. and Deshmukh, R.B. (1991). J. Oilseeds Res., 8: 220-225.
    10. Kaw, R.N. and Menon, P.M. (1980). Indian J. Genet., 40: 305-309.
    11. Kaw, R.N. and Menon, P.M. (1981). IndianJ. Genet., 41: 303-308.
    12. Paschal. E.H. and Wilcox, J.R. (1975). Crop Sci.. 15: 344-349.
    13. Sharma, S.K. and Sharma, N. (1988). Indian J. Genet., 48: 355-358.
    14. Sharma, S.R. (1999). J. ai/seeds Res., 16: 22-26.
    15. Sharma, S.R. and Phul, P.S. (1994). Indian J. Genet., 54: 281-286.
    16. Singh, J.P. etal. (1974). IndianJ. Genet., 34: 427-432.
    17. Singh, R.P. (1983). Madras Agric. J., 70: 215-218.
    18. Sood, V.K. et a/. (1996). J. Hill Res., 9: 139-142.
    19. Sprague, G.F. and Tatum. L.A. (1942). J. Am. Soc. Agron., 34: 923-932.
    20. Srivastava, R.L. etal. (1978). IndianJ.Agric. Sci., 48: 148-155.
    21. Tawar, M.L. eta/. (1989). IndianJ. Hered., 21: 10-16.
    22. Tawar. M.L. et al. (1987). J. Oi/seeds Res., 4: 252-256.
    23. Thompson, J.A. etal. (1997). Crop Sci., 31: 751-762.
    24. Ting. C.L. (1946). J. Am. Soc. Agron., 38: 381-393
    Reviewed By

    Download Article
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)