Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu
Print ISSN 0250-5371
Online ISSN 0976-0571
NAAS Rating 6.80
SJR 0.391
Impact Factor 0.8 (2024)

Frequency :

Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)

Indexing Services :

BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus

Submit

Legume Research, volume 29 issue 3 (september 2006) : 231 - 232

SOURCES OF RESISTANCE TO FUSARIUM WILT OF CHICKPEA

B.C. Barbate, G.N. Dake, B.C. Game, C.B. Bachkar

Affiliations

¹Department of Plant Pathology and Agricultural Microbiology, Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, Rahuri - 413 722, India

Submitted|
First Online |
doi

Cite article:- Barbate B.C., Dake G.N., Game B.C., Bachkar C.B. (2024). SOURCES OF RESISTANCE TO FUSARIUM WILT OF CHICKPEA. Legume Research. 29(3): 231 - 232. doi: .

ABSTRACT

Chickpea wilt caused by Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. ciceri is most destructive and widely distributed disease in India and cause severe losses in yield. Therefore the present investigations were undertaken to screen different genotypes for their resistance to fusarium wilt. A field screening of chickpea varieties (50 + 1 susceptible check, JG-62) was undertaken in wilt sick plot during rabi season of 1999–2000 and 2000–2001. Of the 50 genotypes tested 39 were found resistant, 9 moderately resistant, 1 moderately susceptible and 1 highly susceptible to fusarium wilt. The genotypes Phule G-97311, Phule G-96325 and Phule G-97315 were completely free from the wilt disease.

KEYWORDS

REFERENCES

Ali, M. (1998). National Symposium on Management of Biotic and Abiotic Stresses in Pulse Crops, held at IIPR, Kanpur on 26-28 June, 1998, Souvenir, pp. 57-64.
Dandnaik, B.P. and Zote, K.K. (1988). Indian Phytopath., 41: 420-423.
Haware, M.P. (1988). Proc. Seminar on Present Status and Future Prospects of Chickpea Crop Production and Improvement. 11-13 July, 1988, Spain.
Haware, M.P. and Nene, Y.L. (1982). Plant Disease, 66: 809-810.
Haware, M.P. et al. (1986a). Tech. Bull. 1. Danish Government Institute of Seed Pathology, Copenhagen, Denmark, 32.
Haware, M.P. et al. (1986b). Proc. Natl. Sem. 8-10 January, 1986, T.N.A.U., Coimbatore, India.
Jani, S.M. et al. (1999). Int. Chickpea and Pigeonpea Newsl., 6: 14.
Kapoor, A.S. et al. (1991). Indian J. Pulses Res., 4: 122-123.
Nene, Y.L. et al. (1996). A World List of Chickpea and Pigeonpea Pathogens. 5th Edn., India. International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-arid Tropics, Patancheru, 27 pp.
Pawar, K.B. et al. (1993). J. Maharashtra Agric. Univ., 18: 327-328.

Disclaimer :

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Copyright :

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reviewed By

Share options

Editorial Board

View all (0)

SOURCES OF RESISTANCE TO FUSARIUM WILT OF CHICKPEA

ABSTRACT

KEYWORDS

REFERENCES

Reviewed By

In this Article

APC

Publish With US

Become a Reviewer/Member

Open Access

Products and Services

Support and Policies

Editorial Board