Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu
Print ISSN 0250-5371
Online ISSN 0976-0571
NAAS Rating 6.80
SJR 0.32, CiteScore: 0.906
Impact Factor 0.8 (2024)

Frequency :

Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)

Indexing Services :

BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus

Submit

Legume Research, volume 29 issue 3 (september 2006) : 201 - 204

CORRELATIONS AND PATH COEFFICIENT ANALYSIS IN CHICKPEA

P. Renukadevi1, B. Subbalakshmi

Affiliations

¹Department of Pulses, Centre for Plant Breeding and Genetics, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore - 641 003, India

Submitted|
First Online |
doi

Cite article:- Renukadevi1 P., Subbalakshmi B. (2025). CORRELATIONS AND PATH COEFFICIENT ANALYSIS IN CHICKPEA. Legume Research. 29(3): 201 - 204. doi: .

ABSTRACT

Correlations and path coefficient analysis were worked out for eleven characters including seed yield in fifty chickpea genotypes during rabi 2002. Plant height, number of primary branches, number of pods/plant, 100 seed weight, biological yield/plant and harvest index had positive and significant correlation with seed yield. The positive direct effect onseed yield was revealed by plant height, number of primary branches/plant, number of pods/plant, biological yield/plant, harvest index, days to maturity and soluble protein content. The magnitude of residual effect was very low which indicated that the eleven characters included in the present study contributed most of the portions of the variability in the seed yield. Therefore these traits can be taken into consideration while exercising selection for seed yield in chickpea

KEYWORDS

REFERENCES

Bahl, P.N. and Jain, H.K. (1977). Z. Pflanzenzuchtg, 79: 154-159.
Bhambota, S.K. et al. (1994). Indian J. Genet., 54: 381-388.
Dewey, D.R. and Lu, K.H. (1959). Agron. J., 51: 515-518.
Harisatyanarayana, N. and Reddy, N.S. ( 2002). J. Res. ANGRAU, 30: 29-33.
Jeena, A.S. and Arora, P.P. (2001). Legume Res., 24: 63-64.
Jeena, A.S. and Arora, P.P. (2002). Agric. Sci. Digest, 22: 132-133.
Kumar, S. et al. (2002). Agric. Sci. Digest, 22(2): 134-135.
Khedar, O.P. and Maloo, S.R. (1999). Agric. Sci. Digest, 19: 109-111.
Kumar, S.; Arora, P.P. and Jeena, A.S. (2002). Agric. Sci. Digest, 22: 134-135.
Omar, M. and Singh, K.B. (1997). Intern. Chickpea and Pigeonpea Newsl., 4: 14.
Singh, K.H. et al. (1993). Agric. Sci. Digest, 13: 37- 40.
Singh, N.P. et al. (2001). Ann. Agric. Res. New Series, 22: 564-569.
Singh, L. and Singh, J.D. (2002). Ann. Biol, 18: 129-132.
Tagore, K.R. and Singh, I.S. (1990). Crop Improv., 17: 41- 44.
Webber, C.R. and Moorthy, B.R. (1952). Agron. J., 44: 202-209.

Disclaimer :

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Copyright :

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reviewed By

Share options

Editorial Board

View all (0)

CORRELATIONS AND PATH COEFFICIENT ANALYSIS IN CHICKPEA

ABSTRACT

KEYWORDS

REFERENCES

Reviewed By

In this Article

APC

Publish With US

Become a Reviewer/Member

Open Access

Products and Services

Support and Policies

Editorial Board