Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu
Print ISSN 0250-5371
Online ISSN 0976-0571
NAAS Rating 6.80
SJR 0.391
Impact Factor 0.8 (2024)

Frequency :

Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)

Indexing Services :

BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus

Submit

Legume Research, volume 30 issue 4 (december 2007) : 283 - 286

CHARACTER ASSOCIATION AND CAUSE-AND-EFFECT RELATIONSHIP IN F2 GENERATION OF MUNGBEAN (VIGNA RADIATA (L.) WILCZEK)

Anuj Srivastava, G.R. Lavanya*, Pavan K. Gupta, G. Suresh Babu

Affiliations

¹Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Allahabad Agricultural Institute -Deemed University, Allahabad - 211 007, India

Submitted|
First Online |
doi

Cite article:- Srivastava Anuj, Lavanya* G.R., Gupta K. Pavan, Babu Suresh G. (2024). CHARACTER ASSOCIATION AND CAUSE-AND-EFFECT RELATIONSHIP IN F2 GENERATION OF MUNGBEAN (VIGNA RADIATA (L.) WILCZEK). Legume Research. 30(4): 283 - 286. doi: .

ABSTRACT

The present experiment was conducted to study cause-and-effect interrelationship in three crosses namely, cross 1 (Pusa 9072 × MH-309), cross 2 (LAM M2 × MH-309) and cross 3 (ML-5 × MH-309) of F2 generation of mungbean for six characters during kharif, 2004. Significant differences were observed between the crosses and between progenies of crosses. This study revealed that numbers of pods/plant and number of clusters/plant were the major component characters with moderate to high heritability coupled with high genetic advance asper cent of mean contributing to seed yield, thus suggesting that these characters may be given priority while formulating the cross specific selection strategy for isolation of desirable genotypes for yield improvement in mungbean.

KEYWORDS

REFERENCES

Al-Jibouri, H.A. et al. (1958). Agron. J. 50: 633-37.
Dewey, D.R. and Lu K.N. (1959). Agron. J. 51: 515-18.
Johnson, H.W. et al. (1955). Agron. J. 74: 477-83.
Natarajan, C. and Rathinasamy, R. (1999). Madras Agric. J. 86(4-6): 228-31.
Rajan, R.E.B., et al. (2000). Madras Agric. J. 87(10-12): 590-93.
Sharma, R.N. (1999). J. Interacademica, 3(1): 6-10.
Singh, I.S. et al. (1995). Legume Res. 18: 137-42.
Vikas et al. (1999). Ann. Agric. Res. 20: 411-17.

Disclaimer :

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Copyright :

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reviewed By

Share options

Editorial Board

View all (0)

CHARACTER ASSOCIATION AND CAUSE-AND-EFFECT RELATIONSHIP IN F2 GENERATION OF MUNGBEAN (VIGNA RADIATA (L.) WILCZEK)

ABSTRACT

KEYWORDS

REFERENCES

Reviewed By

In this Article

APC

Publish With US

Become a Reviewer/Member

Open Access

Products and Services

Support and Policies

Editorial Board