Banner
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive

volume 30 issue 4 (december 2007) : 283 - 286

CHARACTER ASSOCIATION AND CAUSE-AND-EFFECT RELATIONSHIP IN F2 GENERATION OF MUNGBEAN (VIGNA RADIATA (L.) WILCZEK)

A
Anuj Srivastava
G
G.R. Lavanya*
P
Pavan K. Gupta
G
G. Suresh Babu
1Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Allahabad Agricultural Institute -Deemed University, Allahabad - 211 007, India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Srivastava Anuj, Lavanya* G.R., Gupta K. Pavan, Babu Suresh G. (2025). CHARACTER ASSOCIATION AND CAUSE-AND-EFFECT RELATIONSHIP IN F2 GENERATION OF MUNGBEAN (VIGNA RADIATA (L.) WILCZEK). Legume Research. 30(4): 283 - 286. doi: .

ABSTRACT

The present experiment was conducted to study cause-and-effect interrelationship in three crosses namely, cross 1 (Pusa 9072 × MH-309), cross 2 (LAM M2 × MH-309) and cross 3 (ML-5 × MH-309) of F2 generation of mungbean for six characters during kharif, 2004. Significant differences were observed between the crosses and between progenies of crosses. This study revealed that numbers of pods/plant and number of clusters/plant were the major component characters with moderate to high heritability coupled with high genetic advance asper cent of mean contributing to seed yield, thus suggesting that these characters may be given priority while formulating the cross specific selection strategy for isolation of desirable genotypes for yield improvement in mungbean.

KEYWORDS

    REFERENCES

    1. Al-Jibouri, H.A. et al. (1958). Agron. J. 50: 633-37.
    2. Dewey, D.R. and Lu K.N. (1959). Agron. J. 51: 515-18.
    3. Johnson, H.W. et al. (1955). Agron. J. 74: 477-83.
    4. Natarajan, C. and Rathinasamy, R. (1999). Madras Agric. J. 86(4-6): 228-31.
    5. Rajan, R.E.B., et al. (2000). Madras Agric. J. 87(10-12): 590-93.
    6. Sharma, R.N. (1999). J. Interacademica, 3(1): 6-10.
    7. Singh, I.S. et al. (1995). Legume Res. 18: 137-42.
    8. Vikas et al. (1999). Ann. Agric. Res. 20: 411-17.
    Published In
    Legume Research
    Article Metrics
    Metrics Icon
    0
    Views
    0
    Citations
    Reviewed By
    Share Article
    Download Article
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us

      volume 30 issue 4 (december 2007) : 283 - 286

      CHARACTER ASSOCIATION AND CAUSE-AND-EFFECT RELATIONSHIP IN F2 GENERATION OF MUNGBEAN (VIGNA RADIATA (L.) WILCZEK)

      A
      Anuj Srivastava
      G
      G.R. Lavanya*
      P
      Pavan K. Gupta
      G
      G. Suresh Babu
      1Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Allahabad Agricultural Institute -Deemed University, Allahabad - 211 007, India

      • Submitted|

      • First Online |

      • doi

      Cite article:- Srivastava Anuj, Lavanya* G.R., Gupta K. Pavan, Babu Suresh G. (2025). CHARACTER ASSOCIATION AND CAUSE-AND-EFFECT RELATIONSHIP IN F2 GENERATION OF MUNGBEAN (VIGNA RADIATA (L.) WILCZEK). Legume Research. 30(4): 283 - 286. doi: .

      ABSTRACT

      The present experiment was conducted to study cause-and-effect interrelationship in three crosses namely, cross 1 (Pusa 9072 × MH-309), cross 2 (LAM M2 × MH-309) and cross 3 (ML-5 × MH-309) of F2 generation of mungbean for six characters during kharif, 2004. Significant differences were observed between the crosses and between progenies of crosses. This study revealed that numbers of pods/plant and number of clusters/plant were the major component characters with moderate to high heritability coupled with high genetic advance asper cent of mean contributing to seed yield, thus suggesting that these characters may be given priority while formulating the cross specific selection strategy for isolation of desirable genotypes for yield improvement in mungbean.

      KEYWORDS

        REFERENCES

        1. Al-Jibouri, H.A. et al. (1958). Agron. J. 50: 633-37.
        2. Dewey, D.R. and Lu K.N. (1959). Agron. J. 51: 515-18.
        3. Johnson, H.W. et al. (1955). Agron. J. 74: 477-83.
        4. Natarajan, C. and Rathinasamy, R. (1999). Madras Agric. J. 86(4-6): 228-31.
        5. Rajan, R.E.B., et al. (2000). Madras Agric. J. 87(10-12): 590-93.
        6. Sharma, R.N. (1999). J. Interacademica, 3(1): 6-10.
        7. Singh, I.S. et al. (1995). Legume Res. 18: 137-42.
        8. Vikas et al. (1999). Ann. Agric. Res. 20: 411-17.
        In this Article
          Contact us
          Follow us
          Published In
          Legume Research

          Editorial Board

          View all (0)