Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.391

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Legume Research, volume 30 issue 3 (september 2007) : 166 - 172

STABILITY ANALYSIS FOR YIELD AND ITS COMPONENTS IN FRENCH BEAN (PHASEOLUS VULGARIS LAM.)

Anjani Kumar Singh, A K Tomer1*, Kuldeep Tyagi1, P P Singh
11Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Raja Balwant Singh College, Bichpuri, Agra - 283105, India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Singh Kumar Anjani, Tomer1* K A, Tyagi1 Kuldeep, Singh P P (2024). STABILITY ANALYSIS FOR YIELD AND ITS COMPONENTS IN FRENCH BEAN (PHASEOLUS VULGARIS LAM.). Legume Research. 30(3): 166 - 172. doi: .

ABSTRACT

Four cultivars of chickpea, two salt tolerant (CSG 8962 and CSG 9651) and two salt susceptible (BG 267 and DCP 92-3) were subjected to salt stress (0.0, 4.0, 6.0 and 8.0 dSm−1) and were investigated for germination index, growth rate, leaf chlorophyll and N-assimilation. Salinity markedly decreased germination and growth rate in all the cultivars but to alesser extent in cultivar CSG 9651 (kabuli). The leaf chlorophyll was more affected in DCP92-3 (desi). The tolerant cultivars had higher nitrate reductase activity, which ultimately resulted in increased activity of ammonia assimilating enzymes GS, GDH, and GOGAT in the leaves of CSG 8962 and CSG 9651. Breeding of kabuli cultivars in saline soils has been suggested in the present study.

KEYWORDS

    REFERENCES

    1. Beaver, J. S., et al. (1985). Crop. Sci. 25: 923-926.
    2. Cambell, L. G. and Lafever, H. N. (1980). Crop. Sci. 20: 23-28.
    3. Eberhart, S.A. and Russell, W.A. (1996). Crop. Sci., 6: 36-40.
    4. Hill, J. (1975). J. Agric. Sci. 85: 477-493.
    5. Joshi, B.D. and Mehra, K.L. (1983). Pro. Horti. 15: 109-111.
    6. Panse, B.S. and Sukhatme, P.V. (1960). Statistical Methods for Agricultural Workers. 2nd Ed. ICAR, New Delhi.
    7. Saeed, M. and Francis, C. A. (1983). Crop Sci. 23: 683-687.
    8. Santos, J. B. et al. (1982). Revista Brasileira de Genetica. 5: 761-772.
    9. Shridhar and Ram, H. H. (1999). Veg. Sci., 26: 6-11.
    10. Vaid, K. et al. (1985). Crop Improv. 12: 28-31.
    11. Vaid, K. and Singh, R. M. (1986). Research and Develop. Rep. 3: 55-58.
    Reviewed By

    Download Article
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)