Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.67

  • SJR 0.391

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2023)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Legume Research, volume 30 issue 2 (june 2007) : 148-150


R. P. Singh, H. S. Yadava, A. S. Yadava1
1AICRP on Chickpea, Jawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya RAK College of Agriculture, Sehore 466 001 M.P. India
  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Singh P. R., Yadava S. H., Yadava1 S. A. (2023). VARIETAL INDICES FOR SEED YIELD AND DROUGHT TOLERANCE INDEX IN CHICKPEA UNDER DIFFERENT ENVIRONMENTS. Legume Research. 30(2): 148-150. doi: .
An attempt was made to know the genetic merits of chickpea genotypes based on linear combination of yield components tested in six environments, created by adjusting the moisture availability in three subsequent years for seed yield and drought tolerance index. The estimates of varietal indices varied from genotype to genotype in different environments. Pusa 362 and Ieee 4958 in rainfed condition and Pusa 256 and JG 130 in irrigated conditions appeared as promising genotypes for seed yield. Similarly, ICCC 4958, KPG59, Pusa 362 and JG 130 appeared as promising donor for drought tolerance index based on genetic merits of yield factors in chickpea.
    1. Shahi. V. K. et ai. (1984). Indian J. Agric. Res. 18: 155-157.
    2. Singh, R. K. and Choudhary, B. D. (1985). Biometrical Methods in Quantitative Genetic Analysis. Kalyani Publisher, Ludhiana, India.
    3. Smith, H. F. (1936). Ann. Eugenies 7:240-250.
    4. Rajput, R.P. et aJ. (1987). J. Agron. Crop Science. 159: 345 - 348.

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)