Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.391

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Legume Research, volume 30 issue 2 (june 2007) : 128-132

IDENTIFICATION OF SUPERIOR DONOR PARENTS FOR DROUGHT TOLERANCE AND YIELD THROUGH COMBINING ABIUTY ANALYSIS IN GROUNDNUT

O. Venkateswarlu, K. Raja Reddy, P.v. Reddy, R.P. Vasanthi-, K. Hari Prasada Reddy, N.P. Eswara Reddy
1Regional Agricultural Research Station,Tirupati-517 502
  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Venkateswarlu O., Reddy Raja K., Reddy P.v., Vasanthi- R.P., Reddy Prasada Hari K., Reddy Eswara N.P. (2024). IDENTIFICATION OF SUPERIOR DONOR PARENTS FOR DROUGHT TOLERANCE AND YIELD THROUGH COMBINING ABIUTY ANALYSIS IN GROUNDNUT. Legume Research. 30(2): 128-132. doi: .
Combining ability analysis of physiological and yield traits was conducted involving eight parents of groundnut in all possible combinations excluding reciprocals. The mean squares for both general combining abUity and specific combining ability were significant for all the characters. This indicated the involvement of both additive and non-additive gene action in the inheritance of characters. In general high magnitude of general combining ability variance depicted the greater importance of additive gene action in the inheritance of traits. Parents, JUG-37, JUG-43 and TIR-46 emerged as desirable general combiners. The crosses, K-134 × JUG-43, K-134 × JL-24 and TIR-46 × JAL-6 were the most desirable specific combinations for pod yield and for other physiological and yield attributes.
    1. Griffing, B. (1956). Aust.'J. BioI. Sci. 9: 463-493.
    2. Labana, K. S. and Mohinder Singh. (1983). Crop Improv .10(1): 15-18.
    3. Makne, V. G. (1992). J. Maharastra Agric.Univ. 17: 153-154.
    4. Mathur, R. K. et aI. (2000). Ann. Agric. Res. 21(1): 65-68.
    5. Nigam, S. N. et aI. (2001). Ann. AppJ. BioI. 139: 301-306.
    6. Rucker, R. S. et aJ. (1995). Peanut Sci. 22: 14-18.
    7. Tyagi, M.K. and Srivastava, C.P. (1999). Legume Res. 22(3) 141-146
    8. Varman, P. V. (2000). Madras Agric. J, 87(6-9): 462-466.
    9. Vasanthi. R.P. et a/. (2004) Abstract. National Symposium On "Enhancing Productivity of Groundnut for Sustaining
    10. Food and Nutritional Security" 11-13 October-2004 at NRCG ,Junagadh, pp. 77-78

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)