Banner

Chief Editor:
J. S. Sandhu
Vice Chancellor, SKN Agriculture, University, Jobner, VC, NDUAT, Faizabad, Deputy Director General (Crop Science), Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR), New Delhi
Frequency:Monthly
Indexing:
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Go...
Legume Research, volume 30 issue 2 (june 2007) : 103-107

ADAPTATION ANALYSIS FOR YIELD AND ITS ATTRIBUTES IN CHICKPEA (CICER ARIETINUM L.)

D:K. Sharmal, Mridula Billore, H.C. SinghaP, , v.P. ~tarial
1Department of Plant Breeding ansi Genetics, College of Agriculture, JNKV\1, Indore - 452 001, India
  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Sharmal D:K., Billore Mridula, SinghaP H.C., ~tarial v.P. (2025). ADAPTATION ANALYSIS FOR YIELD AND ITS ATTRIBUTES IN CHICKPEA (CICER ARIETINUM L.). Legume Research. 30(2): 103-107. doi: .
Fourteen chickpea genotypes were sown at three agro-climatic locations for two years. Pooled analysis of variance and deviations revealed significant differences among genotypes for the characters. Genotype × environment (linear} variance were significant for days-to-maturity, plant height, seeds plant−1 and harvest index. Cultivars JG-74, JG-218 and IG-370 were found suitable for poor-environment, high-yielding environment and wider adaptability over environments, respectively. On per se performance basis, cultivars ICCV-2, JG-412 and IG-226 were found suitable for Indore, Dhar and Jhabua conditions, respectively.
    1. Deshmukh, R.B. et aI. (1998). Indian J. Pulses Res., 11: 79;8l.
    2. Eberhart, SA and Russell, WA (1966). Crop Sci., 6: 36-40.
    3. Patil, J.G. et aI. (1996). Legume Res., 19: 47-5l.
    4. Singh, J.\1. et a/. (1991). Indian J. Genet., 51: 345-348.
    5. Singh, P.K. et aI. (1993). Crop Improv., 20: 59-62.
    6. Sirohi, A. et a/. (2001). Indian J. Agric. Sci., 71: 411-413.
    7. Swarup, \1.P. (1991). Proceeding Intern. Conf., Indian Council of Agril. Res., New Delhi, pp. 112.

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)