Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu
Print ISSN 0250-5371
Online ISSN 0976-0571
NAAS Rating 6.80
SJR 0.391
Impact Factor 0.8 (2024)

Frequency :

Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)

Indexing Services :

BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus

Submit

Legume Research, volume 30 issue 2 (june 2007) : 92-97

GENErIC DIVERSITY IN GRAIN COWPEA {VIGNA UNGUICULATA (L.) WALP}

Indradeo Pandey

Affiliations

¹Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar - 263 145, India

Submitted|
First Online |
doi

Cite article:- Pandey Indradeo (2024). GENErIC DIVERSITY IN GRAIN COWPEA {VIGNA UNGUICULATA (L.) WALP}. Legume Research. 30(2): 92-97. doi: .

ABSTRACT

Forty four grain cowpea genotypes were evaluated for thirteen characters to quantify the genetic diversity existing among them by using Mahalanobis D2 statistics. The analysis of variance revealed significant differences among the genotypes for each character under study. The genotypes fell into nine clusters. Cluster strength varied from single genotype (Cluster IV to IX) to 31 genotypes (cluster I). Cluster III had minimum days to rust flower opening, days to 50% flowering and stover yield per plant in addition to maximum number of pod per plant and primary branches. Cluster II, V, VII had maximum yield per plant, 100 seed weight; pod length and number of seed per pod respectively. Cluster II had minimum days to maturity while cluster VII showed maximum days to maturity. The genotype from cluster I (EC 517119, EC 517121) and cluster II (EC 517113) with high cluster mean for yield and yield contributing characters and low cluster means for days to 50% flowering and maturity may be utilized in future breeding programme to obtain high yield and extra early desirable recombinant.

KEYWORDS

REFERENCES

Girish, G. et aI. (2000). Indian J. Plant Genetic Resources, 14(3): 358-360.
Mahalanobis, P.C. (1936). Proc. Nail. Acad. Sci. India, 2: 49-55.
Rao, c.R. (1952). Advanced Statistical Methods in Biometrical Research, John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York.
Thiyagarjan, KR. et a/. (1988). Mardras Agric. J., 75: 125-128.
Usha Kumari et a/. (2000). Legume Res., 23: 122-125.

Disclaimer :

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Copyright :

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reviewed By

Share options

Editorial Board

View all (0)

GENErIC DIVERSITY IN GRAIN COWPEA {VIGNA UNGUICULATA (L.) WALP}

ABSTRACT

KEYWORDS

REFERENCES

Reviewed By

In this Article

APC

Publish With US

Become a Reviewer/Member

Open Access

Products and Services

Support and Policies

Editorial Board