Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.391

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Legume Research, volume 31 issue 4 (december 2008) : 286 - 288

EFFECT OF DIFFERENT INTERCROPPING RATIOS ON YIELD AND ECONOMICS OF SESAME (SESAMUM INDICUM) + GROUNDNUT (ARACHIS HYPOGAEA) INTERCROPPING SYSTEM

M.M. Mahale, V.B. Nevase, P.G. Chavan
1Dr. Balasaheb Sawant Konkan Krishi Vidyapeeth, Dapoli Dist. Ratnagiri - 415 712, India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Mahale M.M., Nevase V.B., Chavan P.G. (2024). EFFECT OF DIFFERENT INTERCROPPING RATIOS ON YIELD AND ECONOMICS OF SESAME (SESAMUM INDICUM) + GROUNDNUT (ARACHIS HYPOGAEA) INTERCROPPING SYSTEM. Legume Research. 31(4): 286 - 288. doi: .

ABSTRACT

A field experiment was conducted at the Agronomy Farm, College of Agriculture, Dapoli Dist.
Ratnagiri to study the performance of sesame (Sesamum indicum) + Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea) intercropping system under different levels of sulphur in Lateritic soils of konkan. The results indicated that the treatment T5 (sesame + groundnut in 3:1) and the treatment T7 (i.e. sesame +groundnut in 1:3 ratio) ratio recorded significantly higher grain and dry pod yield of sesame and groundnut respectively, which was at par with the treatment T6 (i.e. sesame + groundnut in 1:2 ratio), whereas the LER, crop equivalent yield and B: C ratio were significantly higher observed in the treatment T6 (i.e. sesame + groundnut in 1:2 ratio)

KEYWORDS

    REFERENCES

    1. Anonymous (2004). The Hindu Survey of Indian Agriculture, pp. 5-6.
    2. Bhilare, R.L. et al., (2001). J. Maharashtra Agric. Univ. 26(1):98-99.
    3. Hari Krishna, M. and Reddy Pratap Kumar, A. (2005). J. Oilseeds Res. 22(1):201-203.
    4. Hedge, D.M. and Kiresur, V. (1999). The Hindu Survey of Indian Agriculture, 1999. pp. 67-70.
    5. Khistaria, M.K. et al., (1997). J. Maharashtra Agric. Univ. 14(2):243-244.
    6. Mandal, B.K. and Mahapatra, S.K. (1990). Agron. J. 82(6):1066-1068.
    7. Mandal, B.K. et al., (1990). Indian J. Agric. Sci. 60(3):209-211.
    8. Nageshwar, Lal et al., (1995). Indian J. Agron. 40(2):333-335.
    9. Sethi, H.N. et al., (1992). Indian J. Agron. 37(3):451-455.
    Reviewed By

    Download Article
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)