Banner
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First Articles
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First Articles
Legume Research
Print ISSN: 0250-5371
Online ISSN: 0976-0571
NASS Rating
6.80
SJR
0.32
CiteScore
0.906

Chief Editor:
J. S. Sandhu
Vice Chancellor, SKN Agriculture, University, Jobner, VC, NDUAT, Faizabad, Deputy Director General (Crop Science), Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR), New Delhi
Frequency:Monthly
Indexing:
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Go...

Legume Research, volume 31 issue 4 (december 2008) : 243 - 248

INDUCED MACROMUTATION IN BLACKGRAM VIGNA MUNGO (L.) HEPPER

N. Senapati*, R.C. Misra, K.C. Muduli
1Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Orissa University of Agriculture and Technology, Bhubaneswar - 751003, India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Senapati* N., Misra R.C., Muduli K.C. (2025). INDUCED MACROMUTATION IN BLACKGRAM VIGNA MUNGO (L.) HEPPER. Legume Research. 31(4): 243 - 248. doi: .

ABSTRACT

Seed samples of two varieties of blackgram namely, Basant Bahar and Sarala were treated with
three doses each of Gamma-rays, ethyl methane sulphonate, nitrosoguanidine and maleic hydrazide. In M1 generation, the mutagenic treatments showed reduction in mean values of all characters studied and magnitude of reduction was directly related to dose / concentration of mutagen. Such adverse effects in M1 parameters were more pronounced in MH, NG and Gamma-rays + MH combination treatment. The varieties also showed differential response to mutagenic treatments. In M2 generation the mutagenic treatments were effective in inducing various types of chlorophyll and morphological macromutants and few of those affecting flowering, maturity and plant height were of some breeding value. The frequency of chlorophyll mutations were generally higher in moderate and higher doses of mutagens whereas morphological mutations were higher in middle doses of all mutagens and combined treatments. On an average, the frequency of morphological mutations were higher on NG and EMS treatments of Basant Bahar and combined treatments in case of Sarala.

KEYWORDS

    REFERENCES

    1. Darlington,C.C. and Mc Leish (1951). Nature, 167:407-408.
    2. Gustafsson, A. (1940). Lunds.Univ. Arskr, 36:1-40.
    3. Graf, G.E. (1957). J. Heredity, 48:155-159.
    4. Gautam, A.S. and Mittal, R.K. (1998). Crop Res. Hisar, 16:344-348.
    5. Ignacimuthu, S. and Babu, C.R. (1988). Indian J. Genet, 48:331-342.
    6. Iqbal, M and Khan, A. (1989). Proc. 76th Indian Sci. Cong. III (VI) : 190.
    7. John, S.A. (1995). Madras Agric. J. 82:417-419.
    8. Khan, M.N. (1999). Adv. Plant Sc., 12:203-205.
    9. Kumar, A. et al. (2005). Abst. IFLRC- IV, Oct, 2005, New Delhi, India.
    10. Lewis, K.R. and John, B. (1963). Chromosome Marker, Churchill, London.
    11. Misra, R.C. (1992). Ph.D. Thsis, Orissa University of Agriculture and Technology, Bhubaneswar.
    12. Manapure, P. et al. (1997). J. Soils Crops, 7:208-209.
    13. Rohatagi, N. and Khan, A.H. (1991). Golden Jubilee Symposium on Genetic Research and Education : Current
    14. Trendsin the Next Fifty Years. 12-15, Vol. III, 718 p.
    15. Rakshit, S. et al. (2001). Indian J. Pulses Res., 14:12-115.
    16. Swaminathan, M.S. et al. (1968). In : Mutations in Plant Breeding II, IAEA Vienna, 233-248 pp.
    17. Sahoo, S. (1971). M.Sc. (Ag) Thesis, Orissa University of Agriculture and Technology, Bhubaneswar.
    18. Shaikh, M.A.Q. (1990). Mut. Br. Newsletter, 19:11.
    19. Singh, B.R. and Mohapatra, B.K. (1997). Indian J. Genet., 57:475-477.
    20. Singh, B.R. et al. (1997) Environ. Ecology, 15:352-354.
    21. Singh, V.P. et al. (1999) Indian J. Genet., 58:203-210.
    22. Sharma, A.K. et al. (2005) Abst. IFLRC-IV, Oct, 2005, New Delhi, India.
    23. Singh, V.P. et al. (2005) Abst. IFLRC-IV, Oct. 2005, New Delhi, India
    Reviewed By

    Download Article
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)