Chief Editor:

J. S. Sandhu

Vice Chancellor, SKN Agriculture, University, Jobner, VC, NDUAT, Faizabad, Deputy Director General (Crop Science), Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR), New Delhi

Frequency:Monthly

Indexing:

BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Go...

CORRELATION STUDIES IN PARENTS AND SEGREGATING POPULATIONS OF DIFFERENT CROSSES OF FIELD PEA (PISUM SATIVUM. L)

Anjali Shrivastava, R.L. Pandey, Mayuri Sahu

Affiliations

¹Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Indria Gandhi Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, Raipur-492 006, India

Submitted|
First Online |
doi

Cite article:- Shrivastava Anjali, Pandey R.L., Sahu Mayuri (2025). CORRELATION STUDIES IN PARENTS AND SEGREGATING POPULATIONS OF DIFFERENT CROSSES OF FIELD PEA (PISUM SATIVUM. L). Legume Research. 31(3): 157 - 163. doi: .

ABSTRACT

Character association was studied in three segregating populations with parent in field
pea during rabi 2004-05. The results of character association showed differential
relationship among the traits under fixed and non fixed populations. However cluster/
plant,pods/plant,seeds/plant and harvest index in general have shown significant positive
association with seed yield in both type of populations. In addition plant bearing length,
plant height ,seed setting per cent, pod length and 100 seed weight were also positively
associated with seed yield in all the segregating population. Exceptionally parent FC-1
has shown positive association with phenological characters. Based on the present findings
it is suggested that cluster/plant, pods/plant seeds/plant and harvest index must be taken
in to account during the course of selection for higher yield in dry pea. Beside these other
characters like pod bearing length ,plant height, seed setting per cent and 100 seed weight
should also be consider as potential characters.

KEYWORDS

REFERENCES

Bhupendra, et al. (2003). Progr. Agric. 3(2): 141-142.
Gupta, D. et al. (2004). Progr. Agric. 4(1): 81-82
Joshi, et al. (1992). Adv. Plant Sci. 5(2): 614-618.
Makasheva, R-Kh. and Varlakhov, M.K. (1995). Selektsiya-I-semeenovodstvo No. 5: 41-43
Miller, et al. (1958). Agron. J. 50: 126-131.
Partap, et al. (2001). Crop Res., Hisar 5(3): 505-511.
Rathore, P.K. and Gupta, V.P. (1995). Indian J. Pulses Res. 8(2): 178-180.
Vaishnava, P. and Pandey, R.L. (2001). Indian J. Plant Genet. Res., 14: 52-54.

Disclaimer :

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Copyright :

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.