Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.391

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Legume Research, volume 31 issue 2 (june 2008) : 110 - 113

VARIED RESPONSES OF BLACK GRAM (VIGNA MUNGO) TO CERTAIN FOLIAR APPLIED CHEMICALS AND PLANT GROWTH REGULATORS

P. Jeyakumar*, G. Velu, C. Rajendran, R. Amutha, M.A.J.R. Savery, S. Chidambaram
1Agricultural College and Research Institute (TNAU), Killikulam - 628 252, India.
  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Jeyakumar* P., Velu G., Rajendran C., Amutha R., Savery M.A.J.R., Chidambaram S. (2024). VARIED RESPONSES OF BLACK GRAM (VIGNA MUNGO) TO CERTAIN FOLIAR APPLIED CHEMICALS AND PLANT GROWTH REGULATORS. Legume Research. 31(2): 110 - 113. doi: .
The studies on growth regulation in black gram cv. ADT (Aduthurai) 5 exhibited significant changes in growth, physiology and yield due to chemicals and plant growth regulators. Foliar application of NAA @ 40ppm at pre-flowering stage influenced growth characteristics by showing increased plant height, more number of branches, higher leaf area index and leaf area duration. But, with regard to physiological parameters, the maximum photosynthetic efficiency was observed in brassinolide @ 0.1ppm treated plants as evidenced by the higher specific leaf weight, chlorophyll content, soluble protein and higher nitrate reductase activity. Among the treatments, brassinolide @ 0.1ppm resulted in higher dry matter accumulation, more number of pods and seeds per plant and thereby maximum seed yield. Seed protein content was also found improved due to brassinoliode application.
    1. Awasthi, C.P. et al. (1997). Him.J. Agric. Res., 23(1&2): 70-75.
    2. Balachandar, D. et al. (2003). Legume Res., 26: 53-54.
    3. Chaturvedi, S.K. and Ali, M.(2002).Survey of Indian Agric.,The Hindu, India.pp.62-69.
    4. Jeyakumar, P. (1991). M.Sc (Ag) Thesis. Tamil Nadu Agric. Univ., Coimbatore, India
    5. Kalinch, J.E. et al. (1985). J. Pl. Physiol., 125: 345-354.
    6. Lowry, O.H. et al (1951). J.Biol.Chem., 193:265-275.
    7. Meyyappan, M. (1991).M.Sc (Ag) Thesis, Annamalai University, Annamalai Nagar, India
    8. Misra, S. P. et al. (1980). Z. Pflanxen Zenbta., 85.
    9. Muthuchelian, K. et al. (1994). Photosynthetica, 30: 407-413.
    10. Nicholas, J.C. et al. (1976). Pl.Physiol. 58: 701-735.
    11. Paricha, P.C. et al. (1977). Sci.Cult., 43: 230-231.
    12. Pearce, R.B. et al. (1968). Crop Sci., 6:677-680.
    13. Power, J.E. et al. (1967). Agron. J., 59:231-234.
    14. Prakash, M. et al. (2003). Indian J.Pl. Physiol., 8: 313-315.
    15. Setia, N. et al. (1993). Indian J. Pl. Physiol., 36:47-52.
    16. Senthil, A. et al. (2003). Legume Res., 26: 54-56.
    17. Soleman, N.J. (1988). Intern. B.(Sci. Engg), 49: 265.
    18. Wain , R.L. and Taylor, H.E. (1965). Nature., 207: 167-169.
    19. William, R.E. (1946). Ann.Bot.,10:41-71.
    20. Yoshida, S. et al. (1971).Laboratory Manual for Physiological Studies of Rice. IRRI, Philippines.pp 36-37.

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)