Banner
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive

volume 31 issue 1 (march 2008) : 8 - 13

GENETIC VARIATION AND INTER RELATIONSHIP OF YIELD AND ITS COMPONENT TRAITS IN LENTIL (LENS CULINARIS MEDIK.)

S
Sanjeev Kumar*
S
S.B.L. Srivastava
I
I.P.S. Malik
1Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding C.S. Azad University of Agriculture and Technology, Kanpur-208 002, India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Kumar* Sanjeev, Srivastava S.B.L., Malik I.P.S. (2025). GENETIC VARIATION AND INTER RELATIONSHIP OF YIELD AND ITS COMPONENT TRAITS IN LENTIL (LENS CULINARIS MEDIK.). Legume Research. 31(1): 8 - 13. doi: .

ABSTRACT

Genetic variation and interrelationship among twelve characters were studied in lentil
(Lens culinaris Medik.) by taking 23 genetically diverse genotypes. The PCV was generally higher
that the GCV for all the characters but in many cases, the two values differed only slightly. The
lowest values were shown by days to maturity, number of seeds per pod and protein content and the
highest values were shown by harvest index followed by grain yield per plant and 1000 seed
weight. The heritability estimates ranged from 56 % for number of seeds per pod to 95 % for 1000
seed weight. The expected genetic advance expressed as a percentage of mean, varied from 5.36
for number of seeds per pod to 57.09 for harvest index. The grain yield per plant showed strong and
positive association with seed weight, number of pods per plant and harvest index at the both
genotypic and phenotypic levels. The highest positive direct effect belonged to the number of
clusters per plant, followed by seed weight, and number of pods per clusters. However, the positive
direct effect on number of clusters per plant on grain yield was partially counter balanced by its
negative indirect effect via 1000 seed weight

KEYWORDS

    REFERENCES

    1. Aristarkhova, M. L. and Volunzneva, T. A. (1985). Shornik Nauchnykh Trudov po Prikladnoi Botanike, Genetike i
    2. Selektsii., 91 : 37-43.
    3. Baidya, B.N. et al. (1988). Environ. Eco., 6 : 694-697.
    4. Balyan, H. S. and Singh, S. (1986). Lens Newsl., 13 : 1-3.
    5. Burton, G.W. and De Vane, E.H. (1953). Agron. J., 45 : 478-481.
    6. Dewey, D.R. and Lu K.H. (1959). Agron. J., 51 : 515-518.
    7. Dixit, P. and Dubey, D.K. (1985). Indian J. Genet., 45 : 520-524.
    8. Erskine, W. et al. (1985). Field Crops Res., 12 : 153-161.
    9. Johnson, H.W. et al. (1955). Agron. J. 47 : 314-318.
    10. Joshi, N. et al. (2005). Indian J. Pulses Res., 18 : 144-146.
    11. Mia, M. W. et al. (1986). Lens Newsl., 13 : 12-13.
    12. Pandey, B.P. et al. (1980). LENS, 7 : 32-33.
    13. Rajput, M. A. and Sarwar, G. (1989). Lens Newsl., 16 : 5-8.
    14. Sarwar, D. M. et al. (1984). Indian J. Genet., 44 : 201-205.
    15. Searle, S.R. (1961). Biometrics, 17 : 475-480
    Published In
    Legume Research
    Article Metrics
    Metrics Icon
    0
    Views
    0
    Citations
    Reviewed By
    Share Article
    Download Article
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us

      volume 31 issue 1 (march 2008) : 8 - 13

      GENETIC VARIATION AND INTER RELATIONSHIP OF YIELD AND ITS COMPONENT TRAITS IN LENTIL (LENS CULINARIS MEDIK.)

      S
      Sanjeev Kumar*
      S
      S.B.L. Srivastava
      I
      I.P.S. Malik
      1Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding C.S. Azad University of Agriculture and Technology, Kanpur-208 002, India

      • Submitted|

      • First Online |

      • doi

      Cite article:- Kumar* Sanjeev, Srivastava S.B.L., Malik I.P.S. (2025). GENETIC VARIATION AND INTER RELATIONSHIP OF YIELD AND ITS COMPONENT TRAITS IN LENTIL (LENS CULINARIS MEDIK.). Legume Research. 31(1): 8 - 13. doi: .

      ABSTRACT

      Genetic variation and interrelationship among twelve characters were studied in lentil
      (Lens culinaris Medik.) by taking 23 genetically diverse genotypes. The PCV was generally higher
      that the GCV for all the characters but in many cases, the two values differed only slightly. The
      lowest values were shown by days to maturity, number of seeds per pod and protein content and the
      highest values were shown by harvest index followed by grain yield per plant and 1000 seed
      weight. The heritability estimates ranged from 56 % for number of seeds per pod to 95 % for 1000
      seed weight. The expected genetic advance expressed as a percentage of mean, varied from 5.36
      for number of seeds per pod to 57.09 for harvest index. The grain yield per plant showed strong and
      positive association with seed weight, number of pods per plant and harvest index at the both
      genotypic and phenotypic levels. The highest positive direct effect belonged to the number of
      clusters per plant, followed by seed weight, and number of pods per clusters. However, the positive
      direct effect on number of clusters per plant on grain yield was partially counter balanced by its
      negative indirect effect via 1000 seed weight

      KEYWORDS

        REFERENCES

        1. Aristarkhova, M. L. and Volunzneva, T. A. (1985). Shornik Nauchnykh Trudov po Prikladnoi Botanike, Genetike i
        2. Selektsii., 91 : 37-43.
        3. Baidya, B.N. et al. (1988). Environ. Eco., 6 : 694-697.
        4. Balyan, H. S. and Singh, S. (1986). Lens Newsl., 13 : 1-3.
        5. Burton, G.W. and De Vane, E.H. (1953). Agron. J., 45 : 478-481.
        6. Dewey, D.R. and Lu K.H. (1959). Agron. J., 51 : 515-518.
        7. Dixit, P. and Dubey, D.K. (1985). Indian J. Genet., 45 : 520-524.
        8. Erskine, W. et al. (1985). Field Crops Res., 12 : 153-161.
        9. Johnson, H.W. et al. (1955). Agron. J. 47 : 314-318.
        10. Joshi, N. et al. (2005). Indian J. Pulses Res., 18 : 144-146.
        11. Mia, M. W. et al. (1986). Lens Newsl., 13 : 12-13.
        12. Pandey, B.P. et al. (1980). LENS, 7 : 32-33.
        13. Rajput, M. A. and Sarwar, G. (1989). Lens Newsl., 16 : 5-8.
        14. Sarwar, D. M. et al. (1984). Indian J. Genet., 44 : 201-205.
        15. Searle, S.R. (1961). Biometrics, 17 : 475-480
        In this Article
          Contact us
          Follow us
          Published In
          Legume Research

          Editorial Board

          View all (0)