Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.391

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Legume Research, volume 36 issue 3 (june 2013) : 191-199

EVALUATION OF F4 PROGENIES EMANATED FROM AN INTERSPECIFIC HYBRIDIZATION OF MUNGBEAN AND BLACKGRAM

H.K. Sharma*, D.P. Singh, Arvind Kumar, P.K. Shrotria
1Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, G. B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, -263 145,India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Sharma* H.K., Singh D.P., Kumar Arvind, Shrotria P.K. (2024). EVALUATION OF F4 PROGENIES EMANATED FROM AN INTERSPECIFIC HYBRIDIZATION OF MUNGBEAN AND BLACKGRAM. Legume Research. 36(3): 191-199. doi: .

ABSTRACT

A total of 100 F4 progenies (87 mungbean type and 13 blackgram type) of a wide cross between mungbean (cv BDYR-1) and blackgram (cv DPU 88-1) were evaluated in augmented block design. A wide spectrum of variability was observed for all the characters except for days to first flower. Progeny No.70 was significantly superior over best check for days to first flower, pods/cluster, pod length and seeds/pod. Character association unveiled highly significant and positive association of grain yield with pods/cluster and pods/plant. Metroglyph and index score analysis broadly divided 100 progenies into nine groups across pods/plant and grain yield/plant. Maximum numbers of progenies (60) and maximum variability for different yield contributing characters were found in fifth group. Based on SDS –PAGE analysis dendrogram divided 33 genotypes (31progenies and two parents) into eleven clusters at 85% similarity and the Jaccard’s similarity coefficients ranged from 0.26 to 0.96.

REFERENCES

  1. Abbas, G.; Asghar, M.J.; Shah, T.M. and Atta, B.M. (2010). Genetic diversity in mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] germplasm. Pak. J. Bot., 42(5): 3485-3495.
  2. Anderson, E. (1957). A semigraphical method for the analysis of complex problems. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences, USA Washington, 43: 923-927.
  3. Custodio, H.M., Engle, L.M. and Laude, R.P. (1994). Genetic diversity of seed proteins in populations of mungbean, Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek from the Philippines. Philippines J. Crop Sci., 19(1): 2.
  4. Dadlani, M. and Varier, A. (1993). Electrophoresis for variety identification. Technical Bulletin, Division of Seed Science and Technology, IARI, New Delhi.
  5. Dikshit, H.K., Sharma, T.R., Singh, B.B. and Jyoti, K. (2009). Molecular and morphological characterization of ûxed lines from diverse cross in mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek]. J. Genetics. 88(3). 341-344.
  6. Federer, W.T. (1956). Augmented design. Hawaiian Planters, Record, 55: 191-208.
  7. Federer, W.T. (1961). Augmented design, with one way elimination of heterogeneity. Biometrics, 17: 447-473.
  8. Federer, W.T. and Raghavarao, D. (1975). On augmented design. Biometrics, 31: 29-35.
  9. Ghafoor, A., Ahmad, Z. and Afzal, M. (2005). Use of SDS-PAGE markers for determining quantitative traits loci in blackgram [Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper] germplasm. Pakistan J. Bot., 37: 263-269.
  10. Ghafoor, A., Ahmad, Z., Qureshi, A.S. and Bashir, M. (2002). Genetic relationship in Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper and V. radiata (L.) R. Wilczek based on morphological traits and SDS-PAGE. Euphytica, 123: 367-378.
  11. Haritha, S. and Sekhar, M.R. 2003. Comparison of cluster formation by Mahalanobis D2 and metroglyph analysis in mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek]. Leg. Res., 26 : 100-104.
  12. Hedge, V.S., Parameshwarappa, R. and Goud, J.V. (1996). Association analysis in F2 populations of inter-varietal crosses in mungbean. Legume Res., 19: 107-110.
  13. Katna, G. and Verma, S. (2001). Selection criteria for breeding blackgram for hilly conditions of Himachal Pradesh. Himachal J. Agric. Res., 27: 1-6.
  14. Muthiah, A.R., Sivasubramanian, V. (1981). Genotypic correlations and path coefficient analysis in blackgram [Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper]. Madras Agric. J., 68: 105-109.
  15. Pal, S.S., Sandhu, J.S. and Singh, I. (2005). Exploitation of genetic variability in interspecific cross between Vigna mungo x V. umbellata. Indian J. Pulses Res., 18 : 9-11.
  16. Peterson, R.G. (1985). Augmented design for preliminary yield trials (revised). RACHIS, 4: 27-32.
  17. Rahman, M.A., Islam, O., Rahman, M.M. and Sarker, A. (1993). Genetic variability in segregating populations of mungbean. Thailand J. Agric. Sci., 26 : 223-227.
  18. Rajan, R.E.B., Wilson, D. and Vijayaraghava, K. (2001). Correlation and path analysis in the F­2 generation of greengram [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek]. Madras Agric. J., 87: 590-593.
  19. Reddy, V.L.N., Reddisekhar, M., Reddy, K.R. and Reddy, K.H. (2003). Genetic variability for yield and its components in mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek]. Leg. Res., 26 : 300-302.
  20. Reddy, K.R. and Singh, D.P. (1990). The variation and transgressive segregation in wide and varietal crosses of mungbean. Madras Agric. J., 77 : 12-14.
  21. Renganayaki, K., Balasaraswathi, R. and Rangasamy, S.R.S. (1993). Study of moong and urdbeans using salt soluble protein. Madras Agric. J., 80 : 415-416.
  22. Rohlf, F.J. (1993). NT-SYS-pc: Numerical Taxonomy and Multivariate Analysis System. Version 2.11W. Exter Software: Setauket, NY.
  23. Satyan, B.A., Siddaraju, I.G. and Amarnath, K.C.N. (1991). Genetic divergence in greengram [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek]. Mysore J. Agric. Sci., 25 : 18-25.
  24. Searle, N.Z. (1961). Phenotypic, genotypic and environmental correlations. Biometrics, 17: 474-480.
  25. Shafique, S., Khan, M.R., Nisar, M and Rehman, S.U. (2011). Investigation of genetic diversity in blackgram [Vigna Mungo (L.) Hepper]. Pak. J. Bot., 43 : 1223-1232.
  26. Sharma, B.L., Singh, D.P. and Ram, H.H. (1996). Genetic divergence in greengram (P. radiata) germplasm through use of non-hierarchical Eclidean cluster analysis. Indian J. Agric. Sci., 66 : 193-196.
  27. Sharma, B.L., Singh, D.P. and Singh, K.H. (2000). Evaluation of diverse germplasm lines/cultivars for yield and yield components in blackgram (Phaseolus mungo). Indian J. Agric. Sci., 70 : 154-157.
  28. Sharma, J.D. and Gupta, V.P. (1994). Selection parameters in interspecific derivatives of urdbean x mungbean. Indian J. Pulses Res., 7 : 174-176.
  29. Singh, D.P. (1990). Distant hybridization in genus Vigna – A Review. Indian J. Genet. Pl. Breed., 50 : 268-276.
  30. Singh, S.B. and Singh, S.P. (2000). Study of correlation in segregating and non-segregating populations of mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek]. Appl. Biol. Res., 2:111-113.
  31. Snedecor, G.W. and Cochran, W.C. (1967). Statistical Method, Oxford and IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd. New Delhi:381-480.
  32. Sreedevi and Sekhar, M.R. (2004). Character association and path analysis of morphological attributes in greengram [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek]. Ann. Agric. Res., 25 : 149-152.
  33. Thakare, R.G., Gadgil, J.D., Mitra, R., Shanmugasundaram, S. and McLean, B.T. (1988). Origin and evolution of seed protein genes in Vigna mungo and V. radiata. In: Proc. of the Second International Symposium held at Bangkok, Thailand, 16-20 November (1987), pp 47-52.
  34. Vaithiyalingan, M. (2004). Genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance in blackgram (Vigna mungo). J. Ecobiology, 16 : 389-391.
  35. Veermani, Venkatesan, N.M., Thangavel, P. and Ganesan, J. (2005). Genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance analysis in segregating generations of blackgram [Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper]. Leg. Res., 28 : 49-51.
Reviewed By

Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)