Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.391

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Legume Research, volume 32 issue 4 (december 2009) : 293-297

EVALUATION OF NEW HERBICIDES FOR WEED MANAGEMENT IN CHICKPEA (CICER ARIETINUM L.)

S.P. Kachhadiya, J.J. Savaliya, V.B. Bhalu, A.G. Pansuriya, S.G. Savaliya
1Department of Agronomy, College of Agriculture, Junagadh Agriculrure University, Junagadh-362 001, India.

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Kachhadiya S.P., Savaliya J.J., Bhalu V.B., Pansuriya A.G., Savaliya S.G. (2024). EVALUATION OF NEW HERBICIDES FOR WEED MANAGEMENT IN CHICKPEA (CICER ARIETINUM L.). Legume Research. 32(4): 293-297. doi: .

ABSTRACT

A field experiment was conducted on medium black soil during the rabi season of 2002-2003.
The experiment comprising of twelve weed management treatments were conducted in a
randomized block design with four replications. The results revealed that the highest mean seed
(2937 kg ha-1) and stover (3215 kg ha-1) yields were recorded under conventional methods involving
manual weeding and interculturing as and when required. The pre- emergence herbicidal treatments
involving fluchloralin (0.675 kg ha-1) or oxyfluorfen (0.120 kg ha-1) supplemented with postemergence
application of imazethapyr (0.050 kg ha-1) at 30-35 DAS were also found equally
effective. Significantly higher values of growth characters and yield attributes viz., plant height,
plant spread, number of branches per plant, number of pods per plant, number of seeds per pod,
number of root nodules per plant and seed weight per plant were recorded in
these treatments. However, test weight was not significantly influenced by various weed
control treatments

REFERENCES

  1. Balayan, R.S. (1987). Farmer and Parliament, 22(1):17-18.
  2. Ramakrishna, A.; et al. (1992). Trop Pest Manag, 38(4):398-399.
  3. Singh, A.; et al. (1986). Indian J. Agron., 31(3):269-272.
  4. Singh, R.C.; et al. (1985). In Abstracts of Papers, Annual Conference of Indian Society of Weed Science (undated) 56-57.
Reviewed By

Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)