Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.391

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2023)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Legume Research, volume 32 issue 3 (september 2009) : 180-185

CORRELATION AND PATH COEFFICIENT STUDIES FOR YIELD AND ITS COMPONENTS IN MUNGBEAN (VIGNA RADIATA (L.) WILCZEK)

S.K. Singh*, I.P. Singh**, B.B. Singh**, Onkar Singh***
1Sri Durga Ji Post Graduate College Chandeshwar, Azamgarh-276 128, India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Singh* S.K., Singh** I.P., Singh** B.B., Singh*** Onkar (2024). CORRELATION AND PATH COEFFICIENT STUDIES FOR YIELD AND ITS COMPONENTS IN MUNGBEAN (VIGNA RADIATA (L.) WILCZEK). Legume Research. 32(3): 180-185. doi: .

ABSTRACT

The present investigation was undertaken to estimate the correlation coefficients among
twelve quantitative characters and to study the direct and indirect effects of yield components
on seed yield by path-coefficient analysis in eighty mungbean germplasm lines in three
environments. Analysis of data revealed that primary branches/plant, clusters/plant, pods/cluster
and pods/plant were found to be positively associated at genotypic, phenotypic and environmental
level barring non-significant correlation between primary branches/plant at environmental level.
Positive association at phenotypic and genotypic level was also recorded between pods/cluster
and seeds/pod and between pods per plant and harvest index. Path analysis using phenotypic
and genotypic correlations identified biological yield per plant, clusters per plant and seeds per
pods as most important direct and indirect yield component across three environments.

REFERENCES

  1. Byregowda, M. et al. (1997). Crop Res., 13(2):361-368.
  2. Dewey, D.R. and Lu, K.H. (1959). Agron. J., 51:515-518.
  3. Kumar, S.S. et al. (1995). Madras Agric. J. 82(3):160-162.
  4. Lakshmaiah, K. et al. (1989). J. Res. APAU., 17(4):387-389.
  5. Naidu, N.V. et al. (1994). Indian J. Agric. Res., 28(1):74-78.
  6. Natarajan, M. and Palanisamy, S. (1988). Indian J. Pulses Res., 1(1):23-26.
  7. Patil, H.S. and Deshmukh, R.B. (1988 J. Maharashtra Agric. Univ., 13(2):183-185.
  8. Pundir, S.R. et al. (1992). HAU J. Res., 22(4):256-258.
  9. Satyan, B.A. et al. (1989). Current Res., 18(12):170-172.
  10. Searle, S.R. (1961). Biometrics, 17:474-480.
  11. Sharma, J.D. and Gupta, V.P. (1994). Indian J. Pulses Res., 7(2):174-176.
  12. Sharma, R.N. and Talukdar, P. (1996). Ann. Agric. Res., 17(1):38-41.
  13. Singh, R.P. and Pathak, M.M. (1993). Indian J. Pulses Res., 6(1):35-37.
Reviewed By

Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)